Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: An experimental study in dogs

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1089-1094

  Lee, Sang Hwa ^b   Yoon, Hyun Joong ^b   Park, Min Kyu ^a   Kim, You Sung ^a  

^a Catholic University of Korea ^*

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Alkaline phosphatase; Autogenous drilling dust; Dehiscence; Osteocalcin

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; COLORING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCENT DYE; OSTEOCALCIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; BONE DENSITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOCYTE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TISSUE REGENERATION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TRANSPLANTATION; WOUND DEHISCENCE; XENOGRAFT;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL COUNT; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; COLORING AGENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; FLUORESCENT DYES; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MANDIBLE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOCYTES; OSTEOGENESIS; SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;

EID: 66149149074     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Blanco J, Alonso A, Sanz M. Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: A 5-year case series prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:294-301.
2. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Clinical classification of bone defects concerning the placement of dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:147-155.
3. Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: A comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:210-219.
4. Casati MZ, Sallum EA, Nociti FH Jr, Caffesse RG, Sallum AW. Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2002;73: 789-796.
5. De Boever AL, De Boever JA. Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: A prospective long-term clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:549-556.
6. Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Single stage surgery combining trans- mucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 9-18.
7. Slotte C, Lundgren D, Burgos PM. Placement of autogeneic bone chips or bovine bone mineral in guided bone augmentation: A rabbit skull study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:795-806
8. Gruber R, Baron M, Busenlechner D, Kandler B, Fuerst G, Watzek G. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of cells from cortical bone cylinders, bone particles from mill, and drilling dust.J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:238-243.
9. Springer NLTerheyden H,Geiss S, Härle F, Hedderich J, Acil Y. Particulated bone grafts-Effectiveness of bone cell supply. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:205-212.