A mechanical model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings including the influence of axial load

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-180

  Yamamoto, Sachie ^a   Kikuchi, Masaru ^a   Ueda, Masaiki ^a   Aiken, Ian D ^b  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Seismic Isolation Engineering Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial force; Elastomeric isolation bearing; Large deformation; Nonlinear hysteresis model; Seismic isolation; Seismic response analysis

Indexed keywords

AXIAL FLOW; BEARINGS (MACHINE PARTS); BRIDGE BEARINGS; DEFORMATION; HYSTERESIS; PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL BEAMS AND GIRDERS;

AXIAL FORCE; ELASTOMERIC ISOLATION BEARING; LARGE DEFORMATION; NONLINEAR HYSTERESIS MODEL; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS;

MODEL BUILDINGS;

BUILDING; CYCLIC LOADING; DISPLACEMENT; HYSTERESIS; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHEAR; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 66149148745     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.847     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Koh CG, Kelly JM. A simple mechanical model for elastomeric bearings used in base isolation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 1988; 30:933-943.
2. Koh CG, Balendra T. Seismic response of base isolated buildings including P - effects of isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1989; 18:461-473.
3. Kelly JM. Earthquake-resistant Design with Rubber. (2nd edn). Springer: London, 1997.
4. Iizuka M. A macroscopic model for predicting large-deformation behaviors of laminated rubber bearings. Engineering Structures 2000; 22:323-334.
5. Ryan KL, Kelly JM, Chopra AK. Experimental observation of axial load effects in isolation bearings. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004; Paper No. 1707.
6. Ryan KL, Kelly JM, Chopra AK. Nonlinear model for lead-rubber bearings including axial-load effects. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2005; 131(12):1270-1278.
7. Ryan KL, Chopra AK. Estimating the seismic response of base-isolated buildings including torsion, rocking and axial-load effects. Report No. UCB/EERC-2005/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
8. Kikuchi M, Yamamoto S, Aiken ID. An analytical model for lead-rubber bearings under large deformations. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Singapore, 2007; PaperID 222.
9. Hwang JS, Hsu TY. Experimental study of isolated building under triaxial ground excitations. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000; 126(8):879-886.
10. Buckle IG, Liu H. Stability of elastomeric isolation systems for buildings. International Workshop on Recent Developments in Base-Isolation Techniques for Buildings, Tokyo, 1992; 153-169.
11. Kikuchi M, Aiken ID. An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26:215-231.
12. Ikenaga M, Suzuki A, Miyazaki M. Examples which applied anti-seismic devices to existing buildings and the new approval system for seismic isolator in Japan. Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Assisi, Italy, 2001.
13. Gent AN, Lindley PB. The compression of bonded rubber blocks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1959; 173:111-122.
14. ISO 22762-3. Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators part 3: applications for buildings-specifications. Reference Number ISO 22762-3:2005(E), 2005.
15. Higashino M, Okamoto S. Response Control and Seismic Isolation of Buildings. Taylor & Francis: London, 2006.