Generalizations of Egghe's g-index

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1267-1273

  Woeginger, Gerhard J ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AXIOMATIC CHARACTERIZATION;

EID: 66149148294     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21061     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
2. Ball, P. (2005). Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature, 436, 900.
3. Cronin, B., & Meho, L.T. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1275-1278.
4. Deineko, V.G., & Woeginger, G.J. (in press). A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices. Scientometrics.
5. Egghe, L. (2006a). An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2, 8-9.
6. Egghe, L. (2006b). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131-152.
7. Glanzel, W. (2006). On the h-index: A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67, 315-321.
8. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16569-16572.
9. Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2, 4-6.
10. Liu, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2007). Hirsch-type indices and library management: The case of Tongji University Library. In D. Torres-Salinas & H.F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2007), 514-522. Madrid, Spain: Centre for Scientific Information and Documentation of the Spanish Research Council.
11. Marchant, T. (in press). An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors. Scientometrics.
12. Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of cooperative decision making. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 297-301.
14. Ruane, F., & Tol, R.S.J. (2008). Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics, 75, 395-405.
15. Schreiber, M. (2007). The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe's g-index. Scientometrics, 76, 187-200.
16. Schreiber, M. (2008). An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1513-1522.
17. Tol, R.S.J. (2008). A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 149-155.
18. van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2008). Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 263-271.
19. van Raan, A.F.J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67, 491-502.
20. Woeginger, G.J. (2008a). An axiomatic analysis of Egghe's g-index. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 364-368.
21. Woeginger, G.J. (2008b). An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. Mathematical Social Sciences, 56, 224-232.
22. Wu, Q. (2008). The w-index: A significant improvement of the h-index. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0805/0805. 4650.pdf