Reliability of the five-point test

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 501-509

  Fernandez, Alberto Luis ^a,b   Moroni, Matias A ^b   Carranza, Juan Manuel ^b   Fabbro, Nicolas ^b   Lebowitz, Brian K ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Figural fluency; Five Point Test; Reliability; Split half reliability; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNAL VALIDITY; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; SPLIT HALF CORRELATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THE FIVE POINT TEST; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVALUATION; FRONTAL LOBE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66149144340     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: 17444144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13854040802279675     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1998). Tests Psicológicos [Psychological testing]. Mé xico: Prentice-Hall.
2. Basso, M. R., Bornstein, R. A., & Lang, J. M. (1999). Practice effects on commonly used measures of executive function across twelve months. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(3), 283-292.
3. Burguess, P. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive functions and research. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive functions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
4. Charter, R. A (1996). Revisiting the standard errors of measurement, estimate, and prediction and their application to test scores. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1139-1144.
5. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instrument in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
6. Heaton, R. K., Temkin, N., Dikmen, S., Avitable, N., Taylor, M. J., Marcotte, T. D., et al. (2001). Detecting change: A comparison of three neuropsychological methods, using normal and clinical samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 75-91.
7. Lee, G. P., Strauss, E., Loring, D. W., Mc Closkey, L., Haworth, J. M., & Lehman, R. (1997). Sensitivity of figural fluency on the Five-Point Test to focal neurological dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11(1), 59-68.
8. Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Martínez Arias, R. (1995). Psicometría. Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos [Psychometrics. Theory of psychological and educational tests]. Madrid: Síntesis.
10. Regard, M., Strauss, E., & Knapp, P. (1982). Children's production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 839-844.
11. Ruff, R. M. (1988). Ruff Figural Fluency Test professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
12. Santa-Maria, M. P., Martin, J. A., Morrow, C. M., & Gouvier, W. D. (2001). On the duration of spatial fluency measures. International Journal of Neuroscience, 106(3-4), 125-130.
13. Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Zhu, J., Tulsky, D. S., Price, L., & Chen, H.-Y. (2001). WAIS-III reliability data for clinical groups. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 862-866.