Superb fairy-wren males aggregate into hidden leks to solicit extragroup fertilizations before dawn

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 501-510

  Cockburn, Andrew ^a   Dalziell, Anastasia H ^a   Blackmore, Caroline J ^a   Double, Michael C ^a,b   Kokko, Hanna ^a,c   Osmond, Helen L ^a   Beck, Nadeena R ^a   Head, Megan L ^a,d   Wells, Konstans ^a,e  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC DIVISION   (Australia)

^d QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cooperative breeding; Dawn chorus; Extrapair copulation; Hidden lek; Malurus; Polyandry; Song dialect

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; BREEDING SEASON; COOPERATIVE BREEDING; EXTRA-PAIR COPULATION; LEK; MATE CHOICE; PERCHING BEHAVIOR; POLYANDRY; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONGBIRD; TERRITORIALITY;

AVES; MALURUS; MALURUS CYANEUS; TROGLODYTINAE;

EID: 66149139255     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp024     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alexander RD. 1975. Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimentel D, editor. Insects, science and society: proceedings of a symposium on insects, science and society. New York: Academic Press. p. 35-77.
2. Beehler BM, Foster MS. 1988. Hotshots, hotspots and female preferences in the organization of lek mating systems. Am Nat. 131:229-238.
3. Bradbury JH. 1981. The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW, editors. Natural selection and social behaviour. New York: Chiron. p. 138-169.
4. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM, Tsai IM. 1986. Hotspots and the dispersion of leks. Anim Behav. 34:1694-1709.
5. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson RM. 1985. Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Greewood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M, editors. Evolution: essays in honour of John Maynard Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 301-314.
6. Clutton-Brock TH, Price OF, MacColl ADC. 1992. Mate retention, harassment, and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol. 3:234-242.
7. Cockburn A, Osmond HL, Double MC. 2008. Swingin' in the rain: condition dependence and sexual selection in a capricious world. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci. 275:605-612.
8. Cockburn A, Osmond HL, Mulder RA, Double MC, Green DJ. 2008. Demography of male reproductive queues in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus. J Anim Ecol. 77:297-304.
9. Cockburn A, Osmond HL, Mulder RA, Green DJ, Double MC. 2003. Divorce, dispersal and incest avoidance in the cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. J Anim Ecol. 72:189-202.
10. Cockburn A, Sims RA, Osmond HL, Green DJ, Double MC, Mulder RA. 2008. Can we measure the benefits of help in cooperatively breeding birds: the case of the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus? J Anim Ecol. 77:430-438.
11. Cooney R, Cockburn A. 1995. Territorial defense is the major function of female song in the superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus. Anim Behav. 49:1635-1647.
12. Dalziell AH, Cockburn A. 2008. Dawn song in superb fairy-wrens: a bird that seeks extra-pair copulations during the dawn chorus. Anim Behav. 75:489-500.
13. Double M, Cockburn A. 2000. Pre-dawn infidelity: females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 267:465-470.
14. Double MC, Cockburn A. 2003. Subordinate superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) parasitize the reproductive success of attractive dominant males. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 270: 379-384.
15. Double MC, Cockburn A, Barry SC, Smouse PE. 1997. Exclusion probabilities for single-locus paternity analysis when related males compete for matings. Mol Ecol. 6:1155-1166.
16. Double MC, Dawson D, Burke T, Cockburn A. 1997. Finding the fathers in the least faithful bird: a microsatellite-based genotyping system for the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus. Mol Ecol. 6:691-693.
17. Duncan WJ, Bednekoff PA. 2006. Singing in the shade: song and song posts of northern cardinals near nesting Cooper's hawks. Can J Zool. 84:916-919.
18. Dunn PO, Cockburn A. 1996. Evolution ofmale parental care in a bird with almost complete cuckoldry. Evolution. 50:2542-2548.
19. Dunn PO, Cockburn A. 1999. Extrapair mate choice and honest signaling in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens. Evolution. 53:938-946.
20. Fletcher RJ. 2007. Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. J Anim Ecol. 76:598-606.
21. Fletcher RJ, Miller CW. 2006. On the evolution ofhidden leks and the implications for reproductive and habitat selection behaviours. Anim Behav. 71:1247-1251.
22. Formica VA, Gonser RA, Ramsay S, Tuttle EM. 2004. Spatial dynamics of alternative reproductive strategies: the role of neighbors. Ecology. 85:1125-1136.
23. Gibson RM. 1992. Lek formation in sage grouse: the effect of female choice on male territory settlement. Anim Behav. 43:443-450.
24. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 1991. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behav Ecol. 2:165-180.
25. Gibson RM, Hoglund J. 1992. Copying and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol. 7:229-232.
26. Gonzalez C, Ornelas JF. 2005. Song structure and microgeographic song variation in wedge-tailed sabrewings (Campylopterus curvipen-nis) in Veracruz, Mexico. Auk. 122:593-607.
27. Green DJ, Osmond HL, Double MC, Cockburn A. 2000. Display rate by male fairy-wrens ( Malurus cyaneus) during the fertile period of females has little influence on extra-pair mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 48:438-446.
28. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol. 11:2195-2212.
29. Hoglund J, Alatalo RV. 1995. Leks. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
30. Hoi H, Hoi-Leitner M. 1997. An alternative route to coloniality in the bearded tit: females pursue extra-pair fertilizations. Behav Ecol. 8:113-119.
31. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 2000. "Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Cambridge Phil Soc. 75:21-64.
32. Johnstone RA, Earn DJD. 1999. Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 45:277-281.
33. Jukema J, Piersma T. 2006. Permanent female mimics in a lekking shorebird. Biol Lett. 2:161-164.
34. Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37:43-66.
35. Krams I. 2001. Perch selection by singing chaffinches: a better view of surroundings and the risk of predation. Behav Ecol. 12:295-300.
36. Kroodsma DE. 2005. The singing life of birds: the art and science of listening to birdsong. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin.
37. Langmore NE, Mulder RA. 1992. A novel context for bird song: predator calls prompt male singing in the kleptogamous superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus. Ethology. 90:143-153.
38. Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Ohtonen A, Bailey S, Burke T. 2002. High frequency of polyandry in a lek mating system. Behav Ecol. 13:209-215.
39. Möller AP. 1991. Why mated songbirds sing so much: mate guarding and male announcement of mate fertility status. Am Nat. 138:994-1014.
40. Möller AP. 1992. Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. Am Nat. 139:1089-1101.
41. Möller AP, Nielsen JT, Garamszegi LZ. 2006. Song post exposure, song features, and predation risk. Behav Ecol. 17:155-163.
42. Mulder RA. 1997. Extra-group courtship displays and other reproductive tactics of superb fairy-wrens. Aust J Zool. 45:131-143.
43. Mulder RA, Cockburn A. 1993. Sperm competition and the reproductive anatomy of male superb fairy-Wrens. Auk. 110:588-593.
44. Mulder RA, Dunn PO, Cockburn A, Lazenby-Cohen KA, Howell MJ. 1994. Helpers liberate female fairy-wrens from constraints on extrapair mate choice. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 255:223-229.
45. Oring LW. 1982. Avian mating systems. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC, editors. Avian biology. New York: Academic Press. p. 1-92.
46. Parker GA. 1978. Searching for mates. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, editors. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Cambridge University Press. p. 214-244.
47. Parker TH, Tillin H. 2006. Male blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus choose early-leafing tree species during spring dawn chorus. Bird Stud. 53:253-257.
48. Payne RB. 1981. Population structure and social behaviour: models for testing the ecological significance of song dialects in birds. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW, editors. Natural selection and social behavior: recent research and new theory. New York: Chiron. p. 108-120.
49. Peters A. 2000. Testosterone treatment is immunosuppressive in superb fairy-wrens, yet free-living males with high testosterone are more immunocompetent. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 267:883-889.
50. Peters A, Astheimer LB, Boland CRJ, Cockburn A. 2000. Testosterone is involved in acquisition and maintenance of sexually selected male plumage in superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 47:438-445.
51. Peters A, Astheimer LB, Cockburn A. 2001. The annual testosterone profile in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus, reflects their extreme infidelity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 50:519-527.
52. Podos J, Warren PS. 2007. The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong. Adv Stud Behav. 37:403-458.
53. Ramsay SM, Otter K, Ratcliffe LM. 1999. Nest-site selection by female Black-capped Chickadees: settlement based on conspecific attraction? Auk. 116:604-617.
54. Reichard M, Le Comber SC, Smith C. 2007. Sneaking from a female perspective. Anim Behav. 74:679-688.
55. Safran RJ. 2004. Adaptive site selection rules and variation in group size of barn swallows: individual decisions predict population patterns. Am Nat. 164:121-131.
56. Safran RJ. 2007. Settlement patterns of female barn swallows Hirundo rustica across different group sizes: access to colorful males or favored nests? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 61:1359-1368.
57. Saranathan V, Hamilton D, Powell GVN, Kroodsma DE, Prum RO. 2007. Genetic evidence supports song learning in the three-wattled bellbird Procnias tricarunculata (Cotingidae). Mol Ecol. 16: 3689-3702.
58. Simmons LW. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:125-146.
59. Snow DW. 1968. The singing assemblies of little hermits. Living Bird. 7:47-55.
60. Stillman RA, Clutton-Brock TH, Sutherland WJ. 1993. Black holes, mate retention, and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol. 4:1-6.
61. Tarof SA, Ratcliffe LM, Kasumovic MM, Boag PT. 2005. Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks? Behav Ecol. 16:207-217.
62. Wagner RA. 1998. Hidden leks: sexual selection and the clustering of avian territories. In: Parker PG, Burley NT, editors. Avian reproductive tactics: female and male perspectives Ornithological Monographs No 49. Lawrence (KS): Allen Press. p. 123-145.
63. Wagner RH. 1993. The pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds: a new hypothesis of colony formation. J Theor Biol. 163: 333-346.
64. Westcott DA. 1994. Leks of leks: a role for hotspots in lek evolution? Proc R Soc Lond B. 258:281-286.
65. Westneat DF, Sherman PW. 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 41:205-215.
66. Westneat DF, Stewart IRK. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 34:365-396.
67. Westneat DF, Walters A, McCarthy TM, Hatch MI, Hein WK. 2000. Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. Anim Behav. 59:467-476.
68. Wiley JH. 1991. Lekking in birds and mammals: behavioral and evolutionary issues. Adv Stud Behav. 20:201-291.
69. Wiley RH. 1971. Song groups in a singing assembly of little hermits. Condor. 73:28-35.