Long-term growth and movement in relation to food supply and social status in a stream fish

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 616-623

  Hansen, Eric A ^a   Closs, Gerard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Distribution; Dominance; Giant kokopu; Growth; Movement; Social hierarchies

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOMASS; DOMINANCE; FOOD SUPPLY; GROWTH RATE; MACROINVERTEBRATE; MOVEMENT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SIZE EFFECT; STREAM; TELEOST;

GALAXIAS ARGENTEUS;

EID: 66149131138     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp039     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akaike H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest (Hungary): Akademiai Kiado. p. 267-281.
2. Alanara A, Burns MD, Metcalfe NB. 2001. Intraspecific resource partitioning in brown trout: the temporal distribution of foraging is determined by social rank. J Anim Ecol. 70:980-986.
3. AndersonDR,BurnhamKP,ThompsonWL.2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J Wildl Manage. 65:912-923.
4. Bachman RA. 1984. Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Trans Am Fish Soc. 113:1-32.
5. Beukema JJ, Essink K, Michaelis H, Zwarts L. 1993. Year to year variability in the biomass of macrobenthic animals on tidal flats of the Wadden Sea: how predictable is their food source for birds? Neth J Sea Res. 31:319-330.
6. BurnhamKP, Anderson DR. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer-Verlag. David BO, Closs GP. 2003. Seasonal variation in diel activity and microhabitat use of an endemic New Zealand stream-dwelling galaxiid fish. Freshw Biol. 48:1765-1781.
7. David BO, Closs GP, Arbuckle CJ. 2002. Distribution of fish in tributaries of the lower Taieri/Waipori Rivers, South Island, New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 36:79-808.
8. David BO, Closs GP, Crow SK, Hansen EA. 2007. Is diel activity determined by social rank in a drift-feeding stream fish dominance hierarchy? Anim Behav. 74:259-263.
9. David BO, Stoffels RJ. 2003. Spatial organization and behavioural interaction of giant kokopu (Galaxias argenteus) in two stream pools differing in fish density. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res. 37:315-322.
10. Gowan C, Fausch KD. 2002. Why do foraging stream salmonids move during summer? Environ Biol Fishes. 64:139-153.
11. Hansen EA, Closs GP. 2005. Diel activity and home range size in relation to food supply in a drift feeding stream fish. Behav Ecol. 16:640-648.
12. Hansen EA, Closs GP. 2007. Temporal consistency in the long-term spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate drift along a stream reach. Hydrobiologia. 575:361-371.
13. Harwood AJ, Armstrong JD, Metcalfe NB, Griffiths SW. 2003. Does dominance status correlate with growth in wild stream-dwelling Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)? Behav Ecol. 14:902-908.
14. Kahler TH, Roni P, Quinn TP. 2001. Summer movement and growth of juvenile anadromous salmonids in small western Washington streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 58:1947-1956.
15. Krivan V. 2003. Ideal free distributions when resources undergo population dynamics. Theor Popul Biol. 64:25-38.
16. Magoulick DD. 2004. Effects of predation risk on habitat selection by water column fish, benthic fish and crayfish in stream pools. Hydrobiologia. 527:209-221.
17. Matthews WJ. 1998. Patterns in freshwater fish ecology. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Montgomery WI, Wilson WL, Hamilton R, McCartney P. 1991. Dispersion in the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus-variable resources in time and space. J Anim Ecol. 60:179-192.
19. Moody AL, Houston AI, McNamara JM. 1996. Ideal free distributions under predation risk. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 38:131-143.
20. Morris DW. 1991. Fitness and patch selection by white footed mice. Am Nat. 138:702-716.
21. Nakano S. 1995. Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. J Anim Ecol. 64: 75-84.
22. Nakano S, Furukawa-Tanaka T. 1994. Intra- and interspecific dominance hierarchies and variation in foraging tactics of two species of stream-dwelling chars. Ecol Res. 9:9-20.
23. Parker GA, Sutherland WJ. 1986. Ideal free distribution when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav. 34:1222-1242.
24. Petty T, Grossman GD. 2004. Restricted movement by mottled sculpin (Pisces: cottidae) in a southern Appalachian stream. Freshw Biol. 49:631-645.
25. Railsback SF, Harvey BC, Hayes JW, LaGory KE. 2005. Tests of theory for diel variation in salmonid feeding activity and habitat use. Ecology. 86:947-959.
26. Railsback SF, Lamberson RH, Harvey BC, Duffy WE. 1999. Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecol Modell. 123:73-89.
27. Sullivan KA. 1989. Predation and starvation: age specific mortality in juvenile juncos (Junco phaenotus). J Anim Ecol. 58:275-286.
28. Sutherland WJ. 1996. From individual behavior to population ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Tregenza T. 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv Ecol Res. 26:253-307.
30. Tyler JA, Rose KA. 1994. Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 4:91-123.
31. Ward AJW, Webster MM, Hart PJB. 2006. Intraspecific food competition in fishes. Fish Fish. 7:231-261.
32. Whitehead AL, David BO, Closs GP. 2002. Ontogenetic shift in nocturnal microhabitat selection by giant kokopu in a New Zealand stream. J Fish Biol. 61:1373-1385.
33. Winterbourn MJ, Gregson KLD, Dolphin CH. 2000. Guide to the aquatic insects of New Zealand. Bull Entomol Soc N Z. 9:1-96.