Reflections today prevent failures tomorrow

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 140-144

  Brock, Gary W ^a   McManus, Denise J ^b   Hale, Joanne E ^b  

^a U S ARMY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFTER ACTION REVIEW; BUSINESS LEADERS; INTEGRAL PART; PERFORMANCE STANDARDS; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS;

STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 66149120083     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1506409.1506443     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baird L., Holland, P., Deacon, S. Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, Spring 1999, 19-22
2. Basili, V., Caldiera, Q., McQarry, F., Pagerski, R., Page, Q. and Waligora, S. The software engineering labortatory - An operational software experience factory. Technical Report, 1992, ACM.
3. Brooks, F The Mythical Man-Month, Addison Wesley, Reading, PA, 1975.
4. Curtis, B., Krasner, H., Iscoe, N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Comm. of the ACM 31, 11 (Nov. 1988), 1268
5. Darling, M., Parry, C., Moore, J.Learning in the thick of it. Harvard Business Review, July-Aug. 2005, 84-92.
6. FM 22-100, Army Leadership Be, Know, Do. Headquarters, Department of the Army, 31 Aug. 1999.
7. Haley, T Software process improvement at Raytheon. IEEE Software, 33-41
8. Kellner, M., Briandt, L., and Over, J, A method for designing, defining, and evolving software processes. IEEE, 1996, 37-48.
9. McFeeley, B. IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement (CMU/SEI- 96-HB-001). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
10. Sommerville, I. Software Engineering, 7th edition, Pearson Education, 2004.
11. TC 25-120, A Leader's Guide to After Action Reviews, Headquarters, Department of the Army, Sept. 30, 1993.