Utility of biomarkers in fish for environmental monitoring

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 180-181

  Hanson, Niklas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISH; METABOLISM; TIME; WATER POLLUTANT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISHES; TIME FACTORS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 66149100149     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/1551-3793-5.1.180     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Forbes VE, Palmqvist A, Bach L. 2006. The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:272-280.
2. Hanson N, Förlin L, Larsson Å. 2009. Evaluation of long term biomarker data from perch (Perca fluviatilis) in the Baltic Sea suggest increasing exposure to environmental pollutants. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:364-373.
3. Larsson DGJ, Adolfsson-Erici M, Parkkonen J, Pettersson M, Berg AH, Olsson P-E, Förlin L. 1999. Ethinyloestradiol-An undesired fish contraceptive? Aquat Toxicol 45:91-97.
4. Munkittrick KR, Vanderkraak GJ, McMaster, ME, Portt CB, Vandenheuvel MR, Servos MR. 1994. Survey of receiving-water environmental impacts associated with discharges from pulp-mills, 2: Gonad size, liver size, hepatic EROD activity and plasma sex steroid-levels in white sucker. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1089-1101.
5. Oikari A. 2006. Caging techniques for field exposures of fish to chemical contaminants. Aquat Toxicol 78:370-381.
6. Sandström O, Larsson Å, Andersson J, Appelberg M, Bignert A, Ek H, Förlin L, Olsson M. 2005. Three decades of Swedish experience stresses the need for integrated long-term monitoring in marine coastal areas. Water Qual Res J Can 40:233-250.