Size and shape of saturn's moon titan

Science

Volumn 324, Issue 5929, 2009, Pages 921-923

  Zebker, Howard A ^a   Stiles, Bryan ^b   Hensley, Scott ^b   Lorenz, Ralph ^a,c   Kirk, Randolph L ^d   Lunine, Jonathan ^e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

IMAGING METHOD; MOON; SATURN;

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; IMAGING SYSTEM; LATITUDE; LONGITUDE; MOON; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY; MICROCLIMATE;

EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; HYDROCARBONS; SATURN;

EID: 66149093118     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1168905     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. H. A. Zebker et al., Icarus 200, 240 (2009).
2. B. W. Stiles et al., Icarus, 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.032 (2009).
3. C. Elachi et al., Science 308, 970 (2005).
4. D. R. Rhodes, Introduction to Monopulse (McGraw Hill, New York, 1959; reprinted byArtech House, Norwood, MA, 1980).
5. R. K. Moore, J. P. Claassen, Y. H. Lin, IEEE Trans. Aero. Elec. Sys. AES-17, 410 (1981).
6. C. Elachi et al., Proc. IEEE 79, 867 (1991).
7. See SOM on Science Online.
8. P. G. Antreasian et al., American Astronomical Society (AAS) paper 2008-6747, presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, HI, 18 to 21 August 2008.
9. The ephemeris we used was the JPL Cassini orbit solution as of October 2008.
10. The errors on each measurement are well known and range from tens of meters for the altimetry measurements to hundreds of meters for the SAR monopulse data (1, 8, 9) (SOM). The correlations in time for the spacecraft pointing and attitude knowledge errors, which dominate all of our observations, are less well known. We conservatively assumed that these errors are perfectly correlated along each pass (a constant attitude error) and uncorrelated between passes.Wecalculatedformalerrorsusingadiagonal approximation to the covariance matrix, subject to the assumption of correlated pointing errors for each acquisition.
11. The planetary radii given in Table 1 and elsewhere in the text are the distances from the specified location to the barycenter of Titan. The radii do not equal the corresponding ellipsoid axes if the best-fit ellipsoid is offset from the barycenter.
12. S. F. Dermott, Icarus 37, 310 (1979).
13. A. D. Fortes et al., Icarus 188, 139 (2007).
14. G. Tobie, J. I. Lunine, C. Sotin, Nature 440, 61 (2006).
15. J. C. Castillo-Rogez et al., Icarus 190, 179 (2007).
16. K. Tsiganis et al., Nature 435, 459 (2005).
17. G. Mitri et al., Icarus 186, 385 (2007).
18. J. W. Barnes et al., Icarus 195, 400 (2008).
19. G. W. Ojakangas, D. J. Stevenson, Icarus 81, 220 (1989).
20. S. Albers, map of Titan derived from images at the Cassini Project Web site http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov, available at http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/sos/ sos.html.
21. C. C. Porco et al., Nature 434, 159 (2005).
22. E. R. Stofan et al., Nature 445, 61 (2007).
23. S. F. Dermott, Icarus 73, 25 (1988).
24. We thank the Cassini Radar Team for detailed planning of these observations. This work was supported by the Cassini Project and by NASA as part of the Cassini Data Analysis Program. We also thank the reviewers for many constructive comments on our error analysis and data interpretation. The Cassini Project is a joint endeavor of NASA, the European Space Agency, and the Italian Space Agency. Cassini is managed by JPL, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA.