Oophorectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: feasibility study in dogs

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 69, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1321-1332

  Freeman, Lynetta J ^a   Rahmani, Emad Y ^a   Sherman, Stuart ^a   Chiorean, Michael V ^a   Selzer, Don J ^a   Constable, Peter D ^a   Snyder, Paul W ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

C REACTIVE PROTEIN; GLUCOSE; HYDROCORTISONE; INTERLEUKIN 6;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CAUTERIZATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GASTROTOMY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NOCICEPTION; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; OVARIECTOMY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RELIABILITY; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAFETY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL STRESS; SURGICAL WOUND; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; DOGS; ENDOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MODELS, ANIMAL; OVARIECTOMY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; STOMACH; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 66049127232     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Basse L., Jakobsen D.H., Bardram L., et al. Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 416-423
2. Li P., Xu Q., Ji Z., et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 40 (2005) 1279-1283
3. Wilmore D.W. Metabolic response to severe surgical illness: overview. World J Surg 24 (2000) 705-711
4. Matsumoto E.D., Margulis V., Tunc L., et al. Cytokine response to surgical stress: comparison of pure laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. J Endourol 19 (2005) 1140-1145
5. Kehlet H. Surgical stress response: does endoscopic surgery confer an advantage?. World J Surg 23 (1999) 801-807
6. Wilmore D.W. Homeostasis: bodily changes in trauma and surgery. In: Sabiston Jr. D.C. (Ed). Textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 15th edition (1997), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 55-67
7. Martini L., Lorenzini R., Cinotti S., et al. Evaluation of pain and stress levels of animals used in experimental research. J Surg Res 88 (2000) 114-119
8. Conzemius M.G., Hill C.M., Sammarco J.L., et al. Correlation between subjective and objective measures used to determine severity of postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 210 (1997) 1619-1622
9. Firth A.M., and Haldane S.L. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 214 (1999) 651-659
10. Ko J.C., Mandsager R.E., Lange D.N., et al. Cardiorespiratory responses and plasma cortisol concentrations in dogs treated with medetomidine before undergoing ovariohysterectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 217 (2000) 509-514
11. Morton C.M., Reid J., Scott E.M., et al. Application of a scaling model to establish and validate an interval level pain scale for assessment of acute pain in dogs. Am J Vet Res 66 (2005) 2154-2166
12. Marcovich R., Williams A.L., Seifman B.D., et al. A canine model to assess the biochemical stress response to laparoscopic and open surgery. J Endourol 15 (2001) 1005-1008
13. Davidson E.B., Moll H.D., and Payton M.E. Comparison of laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy and ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet Surg 33 (2004) 62-69
14. Devitt C.M., Cox R.E., and Hailey J.J. Duration, complications, stress, and pain of open ovariohysterectomy versus a simple method of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 227 (2005) 921-927
15. Hancock R.B., Lanz O.I., Waldron D.R., et al. Comparison of postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy by harmonic scalpel assisted laparoscopy compared with median celiotomy and ligation in dogs. Vet Surg 34 (2005) 273-282
16. Naitoh T., Garcia-Ruiz A., Vladisavljevic A., et al. Gastrointestinal transit and stress response after laparoscopic vs conventional distal pancreatectomy in the canine model. Surg Endosc 16 (2002) 1627-1630
17. Fritscher-Ravens A., Mosse C.A., Mukherjee D., et al. Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 585-591
18. Kalloo A.N., Singh V.K., Jagannath S.B., et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60 (2004) 114-117
19. Jagannath S.B., Kantsevoy S.V., Vaughn C.A., et al. Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 449-453
20. Wagh M.S., Merrifield B.F., and Thompson C.C. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 (2005) 892-896
21. Kantsevoy S.V., Jagannath S.B., Niiyama H., et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 287-292
22. Giday S.A., Kantsevoy S.V., and Kalloo A.N. Principle and history of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15 (2006) 373-377
23. Lamade W., and Hochberger J. Transgastric surgery: avoiding pitfalls in the development of a new technique. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 698-700
24. Merrifield B.F., Wagh M.S., and Thompson C.C. Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 693-697
25. Ponsky J.L. Endoluminal surgery: past, present and future. Surg Endosc 20 2 Suppl (2006) S500-S502
26. Rattner D., and Hawes R.H. NOTES: Gathering momentum. Surg Endosc 20 (2006) 711-712
27. Rattner D., and Kalloo A. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Surgeons/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Working Group. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20 (2006) 329-3
28. Sclabas G.M., Swain P., and Swanstrom L.L. Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13 (2006) 23-30
29. Seaman D.L., Gostout C.J., de la Mora Levy J.G., et al. Tissue anchors for transmural gut-wall apposition. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 577-581
30. Sumiyama K., Gostout C.J., Rajan E., et al. Pilot study of the porcine uterine horn as an in vivo appendicitis model for development of endoscopic transgastric appendectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 808-812
31. Wagh M.S., Merrifield B.F., and Thompson C.C. Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 473-478
32. Kantsevoy S.V., Jagannath S.B., Niiyama H., et al. A novel safe approach to the peritoneal cavity for per-oral transgastric endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 497-500
33. Zorron R., Maggioni L.C., Pombo L., et al. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22 (2008) 542-547
34. Ohzato H., Yoshizaki K., Nishimoto N., et al. Interleukin-6 as a new indicator of inflammatory status: detection of serum levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein after surgery. Surgery 111 (1992) 201-209
35. Dabrowski R., Wawron W., and Kostro K. Changes in CRP, SAA and haptoglobin produced in response to ovariohysterectomy in healthy bitches and those with pyometra. Theriogenology 67 (2007) 321-327
36. Burton S.A., Honor D.J., Mackenzie A.L., et al. C-reactive protein concentrations in dogs with inflammatory leukograms. Am J Vet Res 55 (1994) 613-618
37. Luk J.M., Tung P.H., Wong K.F., et al. Laparoscopic surgery induced interleukin-6 levels in serum and gut mucosa: implications of peritoneum integrity and gas factors. Surg Endosc (2008 Apr 29) [Epub ahead of print]
38. McGee M.F., Schomisch S.J., Marks J.M., et al. Late phase TNF-alpha depression in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy. Surgery 143 (2008) 318-328
39. Narula V.K., Hazey J.W., Renton D.B., et al. Transgastric instrumentation and bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity. Surg Endosc 22 (2008) 605-611
40. Glickman L.T., and Domanski L.M. An alternative to laboratory animal experimentation for human health risk assessment: epidemiological studies of pet animals. Altern Lab Anim 13 (1986) 267-285
41. Felsburg P.J. Overview of immune system development in the dog: comparison with humans. Hum Exp Toxicol 21 (2002) 487-492
42. Blecha F. Immunology. In: Pond W.G., and Mersmann H.J. (Eds). Biology of the domestic pig (2001), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 688-711
43. In: Tizard I.R. (Ed). Veterinary immunology: an introduction. 8th edition (2009), WB Saunders, St Louis 112-127
44. Vittimberga F.J., Foley D.P., Meyers W.C., et al. Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227 (1998) 326-334
45. Cruickshank A.M., Fraser W.D., Burns H.J.G., et al. Response of serum interleukin-6 in patients undergoing elective surgery of varying severity. Clin Sci (Lond) 79 (1990) 161-165