May god help you: Faith leaders’ perspectives of intimate partner violence within their communities

Journal of Religion and Abuse

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 55-81

  Knickmeyer, Nicole ^a   Levitt, Heidi M ^a   Bayer, Gary ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Intervention in intimate partner violence and religious leadership; Ministry and domestic violence; Prevention in intimate partner violence and religious leadership; Seminary training and domestic violence

Indexed keywords

EID: 66049091502     PISSN: 15211037     EISSN: 15239179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J154v05n02_04     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aguilar, R. J. and Nightingale, N. N. 1994. The impact of specific battering experiences on the self-esteem of abused women. Journal of Family Violence, 9: 35 – 45.
2. Beaman-Hall, L. and Nason-Clark, N. 1997. Partners or protagonists? The transition house movement and conservative churches. Affilia, 12 2: 176 – 186.
3. Brinkerhoff, M. B., Gradnin, E. and Lupri, E. 1992. Religious involvement and spousal violence The Canadian Case. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31 1: 15 – 31.
4. Burnett, M. N. 1996. Suffering or sanctification: The religious context of battered women's syndrome. Pastoral Psychology, 44 3: 145 – 149.
5. Burt, M. R. 1980. Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38: 217 – 230.
6. Busch, N. B. and Valentine, D. 2000. Empowerment practice A focus on battered women. Affilia, 15 1: 82 – 95.
7. Caiazza, A., ed. 2002. The status of women in the states 2002. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
8. Dunn, M. and DeBonis, N. J. 1979. Teachers' and counselors' guide to accompany a Marriage Role Expectations Inventory. Saluda, NC: Family Life Publications.
9. Ellison, C. G., Bartkowsi, J. P. and Anderson, K. L. 1999. Are there religious variations in intimate partner violence?. Journal of Family Issues, 20 1: 87 – 113.
10. Fortune, M. 1987. Keeping the faith: Guidance for Christian women facing abuse. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
11. Frisch, M. B. and Mackenzie, C. J. 1991. A comparison of formerly and chronically battered women on cognitive and situational dimensions. Psychotherapy, 28: 339 – 344.
12. Garrison, M. 1991. Good intentions gone awry: The impact of New York's equitable distribution law on divorce outcomes. Brooklyn Law Review, 57: 621 – 754.
13. Giesbrecht, N. and Sevick, I. 2000. The process of recovery and rebuilding among abused women in conservative evangelical subculture. Journal of Family Violence, 15 3: 229 – 248.
14. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. 1967. “ 2 ”. In The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter, NY Chapter 3-Theoritcal Sampling and Generating Theory.
15. Haj-Yahia, M. M. 1998. A patriarchal perspective of beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian men from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Journal of Family Issues, 19 5: 595 – 621.
16. Hotaling, G. T. and Sugarman, D. B. 1990. A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives. Journal of Family Violence, 5: 1 – 13.
17. Jones, Y. 2002. Domestic Violence Scars Memphis. The Commercial Appeal, December 23 A1, A2.
18. Knickmeyer, N., Levitt, H. M., Horne, S. G. and Bayer, G. 2003. Responding to Mixed Messages and Double Binds: Religious Oriented Coping Strategies of Christian Battered Women. Journal of Religion Abuse, 5 2: 29 – 53.
19. Nason-Clark, N. and Neitz, M. J. 2001. Feminist Narratives and the Sociology of Religion Vol. 5, New York: Alta Mira Press. 2.
20. Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd Edition Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Rennie, D. L. 2000. Grounded theory methodology as methodological hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory and Psychology, 10 4: 481 – 502.
22. Roy, M., ed. 1977. Battered women: A psychosociological study of intimate partner violence. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
23. Shupe, A., Stacey, W. A. and Hazelwood, L. 1987. Violent men, violent couples: The dynamics of intimate partner violence. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
24. Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Thompson, M. P., Crosby, A. E., Shelley, G. and Sacks, J. J. 2001. Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Violence and Victims, 16 2: 115 – 122.
25. Smith, M. D. 1990. Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5 4: 257 – 273.
26. Spence, J. T. and Helmreich, R. 1978. Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
27. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J. and Steinmetz, S. K. 1980. Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
28. Straus, M. A. and Gelles, R. J. 1990. Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
29. Telch, C. F. and Lindquist, C. U. 1984. Violent versus nonviolent couples: A comparison of patterns. Psychotherapy, 2: 242 – 248.
30. Tjaden, P. and Thoennes, N. 2000. Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence Findings from the Notions Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
31. Walker, L. E. 1988. “ Spouse abuse: A basic profile. ”. In Abuse and religion Edited by: Horton, A. L. and Williamson, J. A. 13 – 20. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
32. Whipple, V. 1987. Counseling bettered women from fundamentalists churches. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13 3: 251 – 258.