New directions in New Zealand's urban planning and research?

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 341-354

  Miller, Caroline ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Sustainable development; Urban planning; Urban research

Indexed keywords

EID: 65949112233     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08111140600876950     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderton, J., 2002. “ Sustainability, New Zealand, Auckland and the future, Opening Address to the Sustainable Auckland Congress ”. In Proceedings of the Sustainable Auckland Congress, Auckland Edited by: Daly, M., 34–36.
2. Auckland City Council. 2000. Growing Our City through Liveable Communities 2050, Auckland: Auckland City Council.
3. Austin, P., 2000. “ Affordable housing and urban planning ”. In Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand, Edited by: Memon, A., and Perkins, H., 274–283. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
4. Baragwanath, L., 2003. “ Globalisation and the knowledge economy: rhetoric and practice New Zealand ”. In Proceedings of the 22nd New Zealand Geographical Society Conference, 121–125. Auckland: New Zealand Geographical Society.
5. Bell, C., 1996. Inventing New Zealand: Everyday Myths of Pakeha Identity, Auckland: Penguin.
6. Briese, R., 2001. Sustaining Sydney: the ‘green Olympics’ from a global perspective. Urban Policy and Research, 19 (1): 25–42.
7. Buhrs, T., 2002. New Zealand's capacity for green planning: a political–institutional assessment and analysis. Political Science, 54 (1): 27–46.
8. Bush, G., 1995. Local Government and Politics in New Zealand, Auckland: Auckland University Press.
9. Bush, G., and Scott, C., eds. 1977. Auckland at Full Stretch: Issues of the Seventies, Auckland: Auckland City Council Board of Urban Studies, University of Auckland.
10. Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet. 2003. Sustainable Development: Programme of Action, Wellington: Government Printer.
11. Dixon, J., 2004. What does performance-based research funding mean for the built environment professions?. Urban Policy and Research, 22 (2): 133–135.
12. Dixon, J., and Dupuis, A., 2003. Urban intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: a challenge for new urbanism. Housing Studies, 18 (3): 353–368.
13. Dixon, J., Dupuis, A., and Lysner, P., 2001. Issues in medium density housing: the experience of Ambrico Place, Waitakere City. Planning Quarterly, 141: 9–11.
14. Dobson, J., and Mees, P., 2003. Realistic sustainability?: urban transport planning in Wellington, New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 59 (2): 27–34.
15. Douglas, M., and Memon, A., 2002. “ Reflections on 50 years of regional planning, Canterbury, New Zealand ”. In Southern Crossings Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Urban History/Planning History Conference, 185–216. Auckland: University of Auckland.
16. Dupuis, A., and Dixon, J., 2002. Intensification in Auckland: issues and policy implications. Urban Policy and Research, 20 (4): 415–428.
17. Fookes, T., 2000. “ Auckland's urban growth management ”. In Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand, Edited by: Memon, A., and Perkins, H., 263–273. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
18. Frieder, J., 1998. “ Approaching Sustainability: Integrated Environmental Management & New Zealand's Resource Management Act ”. Ian Axford NZ Fellowship in Public Policy, Wellington, New Zealand
19. FRST (Foundation for Research, Science & Technology). 2002a. Request for Proposals; Sustainable Development, Wellington: FRST.
20. FRST. 2002b. Recommendations that Influence the Nature of the Sustainable Development Investment Process: Sustainable Development Information Paper 2, FRST: Wellington.
21. FRST (2002d) Strategic portfolio outline: sustainable cities and settlements. Available at www.frst.govt.nz (http://www.frst.govt.nz) (accessed 20 November 2003).
22. FRST (2003a) Registrations of interest: sustainable cities and settlements. Available at www.frst.govt.nz (http://www.frst.govt.nz) (accessed 15 January 2003).
23. FRST (2003b) Investment structures to be simplified. Foundation: The Newsletter of Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, 48(December), p. 2.
24. Gleeson, B., Darbas, T., and Lawson, S., 2004. Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies: a socio-theoretical analysis. Urban Policy and Research, 22 (4): 345–366.
25. Gow, L., 2000. Curbing the Sprawl: Urban Growth Management in the United States—Lessons for New Zealand, Wellington: MFE.
26. Harding, W. (2002) Response to questions from Wendy Harding BUILD Editor, BRANZ Ltd. Available at http://www.beehive.govt.nz-ministerial media statements (accessed 17 January 2003).
27. Haughton, G., 1999. Searching for the sustainable city: competing philosophical rationales and processes of ideological capture in Adelaide, South Australia. Urban Studies, 36 (11): 1891–1906.
28. Hobbs, M. (2003) Auckland Mayoral Forum—Sustainable Development. Available at http://www.beehive.govt.nz/viewdocument.cfm/documentid=15945 (accessed 18 January 2005).
29. Johnston, J., 1984. The state of social science research in New Zealand. Pacific Viewpoint, 25 (2): 227–235.
30. LGNZ (Local Government New Zealand). 2002. Briefing Paper to the Hon. Marion Hobbs: Minister of Urban Affairs, Wellington: LGNZ.
31. Marsden Fund Update. 2004, October. Recipients of 2004 Marsden Fund Grants. Marsden Fund Update,: 2–3.
32. Miller, C. L., 1998. “ Regional planning in New Zealand 1929–1946: an exercise in frustration ”. In 8th International Planning History Conference on the Twentieth Century Urban Planning Experience, Sydney: University of New South Wales.
33. Miller, C. L., 2002. The origins of town planning in New Zealand 1900–1926: a divergent path?. Planning Perspectives, 17 (3): 209–225.
34. Miller, C. L., 2004. Theory poorly practiced: the garden suburb in New Zealand. Planning Perspectives, 19 (1): 37–55.
35. Milne, J., 2005. Aucklanders' plea; end the jams. New Zealand Herald on Sunday,: 10–11. 31 July
36. MFE (Ministry for the Environment). 2002a. People+Places+Spaces: A Design Guide for Urban New Zealand, Wellington: MFE.
37. MFE. 2002b. Live+Work+Play: Liveable Urban Environment: Process, Strategy, Action, Wellington: MFE.
38. MFE. 2003. Urban Sustainability Worldwide: An Information Resource for Urban Practitioners, Wellington: MFE.
39. MFE/FRST. 2002. Innovation for Sustainability & Eco-Efficiency Workshop, Wellington: MFE.
40. Ministry of Education/Transition Tertiary Education Committee. 2002. Investing in Excellence: The Report of the Performance-Based Research Fund Working Group, Wellington: TEC.
41. Moriarty, P., 2002. Environmental sustainability of large Australian cities. Urban Policy and Research, 20 (3): 233–244.
42. NZ Census. 2001. Statistics New Zealand Website www.stats.govt.nz
43. Oram, R., 2003. Ambition essential if New Zealand to thrive. Sunday Star Times, 13 April
44. PCE (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment). 2000. Ageing Pipes and Murky Waters: Urban Water System Issues for the 21st Century, Wellington: PCE.
45. PCE. 2001. Beyond Ageing Pipes: Urban Water System Issues for the 21st Century, Wellington: PCE.
46. PCE. 2002. Creating Our Future: Sustainable Development for New Zealand, Wellington: PCE.
47. Perkins, H., and Thorns, D., 1998. “ Urban planning in New Zealand: the influences of the Resource Management Act and the Local Government Act, in: Royal Society/UNESCO ”. In Urban Sustainability in New Zealand 17–21. Miscellaneous Series 53.
48. Perkins, H., and Thorns, D., 1998. “ Urban sustainability—the basis for a renewed urban planning and management project? ”. In Royal Society/UNESCO, Urban Sustainability in New Zealand 3–7. Miscellaneous Series 53.
49. Perkins, H., and Thorns, D., 2001. A decade on: reflections on the Resource Management Act 1991 and the practice of urban planning in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (5): 639–654.
50. Prince, R., 2003. “ Catching the knowledge wave: New Zealand and the global economy ”. In Proceedings of the 22nd New Zealand Geographical Society Conference, 155–159. Auckland: New Zealand Geographical Society.
51. Roche, M., 1993. Public Good Science Fund: Crown Research Institutes and the restructuring of state science research in New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 49 (1): 42–45.
52. Stilwell, F., 2000. Towards sustainable cities. Urban Policy and Research, 18 (2): 205–217.
53. Skelton, P., and Memon, A., 2002. Adopting sustainability as an overarching environmental management policy: a review of section 5 of the RMA. Resource Management Journal, 10 (1): 1–10.
54. Sustainable Cities Trust (2001) Approaches & Networks for Progress: SPO: Sustainable Cities and Settlements, Report for FRST. Available at www.frst.govt.nz (http://www.frst.govt.nz) (accessed 15 January 2003).
55. Whitelaw, J., ed. 1967. Auckland in Ferment, Auckland: New Zealand Geographical Society.
56. www.clerk.parliament.govt.nz/yourmp/listmps (http://www.clerk.parliament.govt.nz/yourmp/listmps) (accessed 18 January 2005).
57. Zöllner, H., 2004. Urban policy in New Zealand's new initiatives and familiar barriers. Urban Policy and Research, 22 (2): 221–230.