Collaborative, participative and interactive enterprise modeling

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 24 LNBIP, Issue , 2009, Pages 651-662

  Barjis, Joseph ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Business process modeling; Business process simulation; Collaborative modeling; CPI modeling; DEMO methodology; Enterprise modeling; Enterprise simulation; Interactive modeling; Language action perspective; Participative modeling; Petri net

Indexed keywords

GRAPH THEORY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS; PETRI NETS; SIMULATORS;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; BUSINESS PROCESS SIMULATION; COLLABORATIVE MODELING; CPI MODELING; DEMO METHODOLOGY; ENTERPRISE MODELING; ENTERPRISE SIMULATION; INTERACTIVE MODELING; LANGUAGE-ACTION PERSPECTIVE; PARTICIPATIVE MODELING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION LANGUAGES;

EID: 65949107857     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01347-8_54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Three Good Reasons for Using a Petri-net-based Workflow Management System. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Information and Process Integration in Enterprises (1996)
2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.): Business Process Management: Models, Techniques and Empirical Studies. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
3. Aris, R.: Mathematical Modelling Techniques, New York (1994)
4. Arnowitz, J., Arent, M., Berger, N.: Effective Prototyping for Software Makers. Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier, Inc. (2007)
5. Barjis, J.: The Importance of Business Process Modeling in Software Systems Design. Journal of The Science of Computer Programming 71(1), 73-87 (2008)
6. Bollojy, N., Leung, S.S.K.: Assisting Novice Analysts in Developing Quality Conceptual Models with UML. Communications of the ACM 49(7) (July 2006)
7. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
8. Dehnert, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Bridging the Gap Between Business Models and Workflow Specifications. Int. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13(3), 289-332 (2004)
9. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology -Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Dobing, B., Parsons, J.: How UML is used. Communications of the ACM 49(5) (May 2006)
11. van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Verification of EPCs: Using Reduction Rules and Petri Nets. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (2005)
12. Eichner, C., Fleischhack, H., Meyer, R., Schrimpf, U., Stehno, C.: Compositional Semantics for UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams Using Petri Nets. In: SDL Forum 2005, pp. 133-148 (2005)
13. Eshuis, R.: Symbolic Model Checking of UML Activity Diagram. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 15(1) (January 2006)
14. Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M.: On Ontologies and Enterprise Modelling. In: International Conference on Enterprise Integration Modelling Technology 1997 (1997)
15. Gershenfeld, N.: The Nature of Mathematical Modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
16. IDEF, Family of Methods web page (2003), http://www.idef.com
17. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley Longman (1998)
18. Koehler, J., Hauser, R., Küster, J., Ryndina, K., Vanhatalo, J., Wahler, M.: The role of visual modeling and model transformation in business-driven development. ENTCS, vol. V, p. 211 (2008)
19. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65-100 (1987)
20. Lindland, O., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42-49 (1994)
21. Mayer, R.J., Painter, M., deWitte, P.: IDEF Family of Methods for Concurrent Engineering and Business Re-engineering Applications. Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (1992)
22. Persson, A.: Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach, PhD dissertation, Stockholm University (2001)
23. Prakash, N.: Bringing Enterprise Business Processes into Information System Products. In: Stirna, J., Persson, A. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 15 (2008)
24. Siau, K., Cao, Q.: Unified Modeling Language (UML) - a complexity analysis. Journal of Database Management 12(1), 26-34 (2001)
25. Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546-560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
26. Torchiano, M., Bruno, G.: Enterprise modeling by means of UML instance models. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 28(2) (2003)
27. de Vreede, G.-J.: Participative Modelling for Understanding: Facilitating Organizational Change with GSS. In: Proceedings of the 29th HICSS (1996)