Biometric morphing: A novel technique for the analysis of morphologic outcomes after facial surgery

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 48-53

  Pahuta, Markian A ^a   Mainprize, James G ^b   Rohlf, F James ^c   Antonyshyn, Oleh M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biometric morphing; Enophthalmos; Facial surgery; Geometric morphometrics; Image morphing; Morphological analysis; Rhinoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; ENOPHTHALMOS; EYE SURGERY; FACE SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOMETRY; ENOPHTHALMOS; HUMANS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RHINOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65949096633     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181743386     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.
2. Farkas LG, Ross RB, Posnick JC, et al. Orbital measurements in 63 hyper-teloric patients: differences between the anthropometric and cephalometric findings. J Cranio Max Fac Surg. 1989;17:249-254.
3. Antonyshyn OM, Gruss JS, Galbraith DJ, et al. Complex orbital fractures: a critical analysis of immediate bone graft reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;22:220-233.
4. Bookstein FL. Thin-plate splines and the atlas problem for biomedical images. In: Colchester ACF, Hawkes DJ, eds. Information Processing in Medical Imaging: 12th International Conference IPMI 1991. Wye, UK: July 7-12, 1991:326-342.
5. Beier T, Neely S. Feature-based metamorphosis. Comput Graph. 1992;26:35-42.
6. Steyvers M. Morphing techniques for manipulating face images. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999;31:359-369.
7. Lee S, Wolberg G, Shin SY. Polymorph: morphing among multiple images. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 1998;18:58-71.
8. Adams CD, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the "revolution." Ital J Zool. 2004;71:5-16.
9. tpsDIG [computer program]. Version 2.4. Rohlf, FJ; 2006. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
10. tpsUtil [computer program]. Version 1.36. Rohlf, FJ; 2005. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
11. tpsRelw [computer program]. Version 1.42. Rohlf, FJ; 2005. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
12. tpsSuper [computer program]. Versoin 1.14. Rohlf, FJ; 2004. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
13. Sharp HR, Tingay RS, Coman S, et al. Computer imaging and patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116:1009-1013.
14. Vuyk HD, Stroomer J, Vinayak B. The role of computer imaging in facial plastic surgery consultation: a clinical study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23:235-243.
15. Thomas JR, Freeman MS, Remmler DJ, et al. Analysis of patient response to preoperative computerized video imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:793-796.
16. Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, et al. A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:46-49.
17. Muhlbauer W, Holm C. Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:2098-2104.
18. Papasotiriou OS, Nathanson D, Goldstein RE. Computer imaging versus conventional esthetic consultation: a prospective clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2000;12:72-77.
19. Bronz G. The role of the computer imaging system inmodern aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:159-163.
20. Bronz G. Predictability of the computer imaging system in primary rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994;18:175-181.
21. Schoenrock LD. Five-year facial plastic experience with computer imaging. Facial Plast Surg. 1990;7:18-25.
22. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:129-132.
23. Bookstein FL. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal. 1997;1:225-243.
24. Bookstein FL. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Stat Sci. 1986;1:181-242.
25. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40-59.
26. Bookstein FL. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
27. Khambay B, Nebel JC, Bowman J, et al. 3D stereophotogrammetric image superimposition onto 3D CT scan images: the future of orthognathic surgery. A pilot study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17:331-341.