Natural beaches produce more hatchling marine turtles than developed beaches, despite regional differences in hatching success

Biology Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 268-269

  Pike, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARETTA CARETTA; CHELONIA MYDAS; DEVELOPMENT; GEOGRAPHY; HATCHING; HATCHLING; MARINE SPECIES; NESTING; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SEASHORE; TEMPERATURE; TURTLE; UNITED STATES;

CHELONIIDAE;

EID: 65949096317     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0693     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Debachere, M. C. 1995 Problems in obtaining grey literature. IFLA J. 21, 94-98.
2. Fuentes, M. M. P. B. & Hamann, M. 2009 A rebuttal to the claim natural beaches confer fitness benefits to nesting marine turtles. Biol. Lett. 5, 266-267.
3. Hawkes, L. A., Broderick, A. C., Godfrey, M. H. & Godley, B. J. 2007 Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on a marine turtle population. Global Change Biol. 13, 923-932.
4. Lacanilao, F. 1997 Continuing problems with gray literature. Environ. Biol. Fish. 49, 1-5. (doi:10.1023/A:1007365518667) (Pubitemid 127739413)
5. Pike, D. A. 2008 Natural beaches confer fitness benefits to nesting marine turtles. Biol. Lett. 4, 704-706.
6. Small, C. & Nicholls, R. J. 2003 A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J. Coast. Res. 19, 584-599. (Pubitemid 37029403)