Fields of sustainable architecture

Journal of Architecture

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 9-21

  Owen, Ceridwen ^a,b   Dovey, Kim ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65849514421     PISSN: 13602365     EISSN: 14664410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13602360701865373     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. P. Bourdieu, Distinction (London, Routledge, 1984);
2. P. Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production (New York, Columbia University Press, 1993).
3. P. Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production, op. cit.;
4. P. Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge, UK, Polity Press, 1991).
5. D. Swartz, Culture and Power (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1997);
6. see also: G. Stevens, The Favoured Circle (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1998).
7. P. Bourdieu, In Other Words (Cambridge, UK, Polity Press, 1990).
8. D. Swartz, Culture and Power, op. cit., p. 43.
9. K. Dovey, 'The Silent Complicity of Architecture', in, J. Hillier and E. Rooksby, eds, Habitus: A Sense of Place, 2nd ed. (London, Ashgate, 2005), pp. 283-96;
10. K. Dovey, Framing Places (London, Routledge, 1999).
11. M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge (New York, Pantheon, 1980).
12. Pierre Bourdieu in L.J.D. Wacquant, 'Toward a Reflexive Sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu', Sociological Theory, 7, 1 (1989), pp. 26-63.
13. K. Dovey, 'Architectural Ethics: A dozen dilemmas', Practices, 2 (Spring, 1993), pp. 26-33;
14. J. Blau, Architects and Firms (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1984);
15. S. Dostoglu, 'On the Fundamental Dilemmas of Architecture-as-Profession', Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2, 7 (Middle East Technical University, 1986), pp. 51-66.
16. D. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner (New York, Basic Books, 1983);
17. M.S. Larson, The Rise of Professionalism (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1977), p. x.
18. M.S. Larson, The Rise of Professionalism, op. cit., p. x.
19. D. Cuff, 'The Ethos and Circumstance of Design', Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6, 4 (1989), pp. 305-320.
20. W. Liangyong, 'Introduction to the UIA Beijing Charter', The Journal of Architecture, 5 (Spring, 2000), p. 5.
21. J. Hill, The Illegal Architect (London, Black Dog Publishing, 1998), p. 16.
22. This distinction is originally attributed to Pevsner who identified architecture with aesthetic intent: N. Pevsner, An Outline of European Architecture, 2nd ed. (Harmondsworth, England, Penguin, 1945).
23. A. Ward, 'The Suppression of the Social in Design', in, T.A. Dutton and L.H. Mann, eds, Reconstructing Architecture (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1996), p. 27.
24. S. Fisher, 'How to Think about the Ethics of Architecture', in, W. Fox, ed., Ethics and the Built Environment (London, Routledge, 2000), p. 171.
25. D. Cuff, 'The Ethos and Circumstance of Design', op. cit.;
26. M. Gusevich, 'The Architecture of Criticism', in, A. Kahn, ed., Drawing, Building, Text (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1991), pp. 8-24;
27. M. S. Larson, Behind the Postmodern Façade (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993);
28. J. Hill, The Illegal Architect, op. cit.;
29. M. Crawford, 'Can Architects be Socially Responsible?', in, D. Ghirardo, ed., A Social Criticism of Architecture (Seattle, Bay Press, 1991), pp. 27-44.
30. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (New York, Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 42.
31. D. Yencken and D. Wilkinson, Resetting the Compass (Melbourne, CSIRO Publishing, 2000), p. 336;
32. nd ed. (Boston, Shambhala, 1995), pp. 417-27.
33. H. Skolimowski, Living Philosophy (London, Arkana, 1992), pp. 182-83;
34. F. Guattari, 'The Object of Ecosophy', in, A. Marras, ed., ECO-JEC: Architecture of the in-between (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 1999), pp. 10-21;
35. F. Capra, 'Deep Ecology: A new paradigm', in, G. Sessions, ed., Deep Ecology for the 21st Century, op. cit., pp. 19-25;
36. M.E. Zimmerman, 'The Role of Spiritual Discipline in Learning to Dwell on Earth', in, D. Seamon and R. Mugerauer, eds, Dwelling, Place and Environment (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1985), pp. 247-56;
37. M. McCloskey, 'Foreword', in, J.G. Mitchell and C.L. Stallings, eds, Ecotactics (New York, Trident Press, 1970), p. 11.
38. F. Capra, The Tao of Physics, 2nd ed. (Boston, Shambhala, 1985);
39. A. Naess, 'The Deep Ecological Movement', in, G. Sessions, ed., Deep Ecology for the 21st Century, op. cit., pp. 64-84;
40. R. Routley, 'Roles and Limits of Paradigms in Environmental Thought and Action', in, R. Elliot and A. Gare, eds, Environmental Philosophy (St Lucia, University of Queensland Press, 1983), pp. 260-93.
41. K. Soper, What is Nature? (Oxford, Blackwell, 1995);
42. D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women (New York, Routledge, 1991);
43. S. Hagan, Taking Shape (Oxford, Architectural Press, 2001);
44. E. Grosz, Architecture from the Outside (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 2001).
45. N. Levy, 'Foucault's Unnatural Ecology', in, É Darier, ed., Discourses of the Environment (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 1999), p. 203.
46. Jacobs argues that it is futile to engage with specific and universal definitions of sustainable development since it is a 'contestable concept' similar to that of social justice or democracy: M. Jacobs, 'Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept', in, A. Dobson, ed., Fairness and Futurity (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 25.
47. M. Jacobs, 'Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept', op. cit.;
48. R. Talbot and G. C. Magnoli, 'Social Inclusion and the Sustainable City', in, W. Fox, ed., Ethics and the Built Environment, op. cit., pp. 91 -101;
49. J. Porritt, Seeing Green (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1984);
50. I. Lanthier and L. Olivier, 'The Construction of Environmental "Awareness"', in, Darier, ed., Discourses of the Environment, op. cit., pp. 63-78.
51. D. Worster, 'The Shaky Ground of Sustainability', op. cit.
52. Hay argues that the foundation of the contemporary environmental movement in the scientific realm enables the field to distance itself from dubious environmental ideologies such as eco fascism: P. Hay, Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought (Sydney, UNSW Press, 2002).
53. This material is extracted from the PhD thesis of the lead author: C. Owen, 'The Green Field: The (sub) culture of sustainable architecture', PhD Thesis (University of Melbourne, 2004).
54. Marshall and Rossman term this 'elite' interviewing: C. Marshall and G.B. Rossman, Designing Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. (Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications, 1999).
55. B.L. Berg, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th ed. (Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 2001), p. 33.
56. Philip argues that architecture's aesthetic dominance ultimately leads to the co-option of egalitarian agendas to apolitical and asocial ends: D. Philip, 'Authority, Myth and Sustainable Futures', Papers for Centre for Architecture and Planning Research (Perth, Western Australia, Curtin University of Technology, 1994).
57. Jones views it as a reduction of a concept that is immanent in architecture to a stylistic architectural 'ism': D. L. Jones, Architecture and the Environment (London, Laurence King, 1998), p. 13.
58. th-19th November, 2005. The Royal Australian Institute of Architects has given awards for sustainability since 1993.
59. Boughey (1968) in D. Cuff, 'The Ethos and Circumstance of Design', op. cit.
60. For example, see: J. Wines, Green Architecture (Köln, Taschen, 2000).
61. Guy and Moore argue that the conflation of 'sustainability' and 'energy efficiency' is a common perception within architecture, despite the multiplicity of sustainable practices: S. Guy and S.A. Moore, 'Introduction: The paradoxes of sustainable architecture', in, S. Guy and S.A. Moore, eds, Sustainable Architectures (New York, Spon Press, 2005), pp. 1-12.
62. Websters New World Dictionary (New York, World Publishing, 1968).