Seem and evidentiality

Functions of Language

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 63-88

  Aijmer, Karin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65849486479     PISSN: 0929998X     EISSN: 15699765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/fol.16.1.05aij     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.). 2003. Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
3. Altenberg, Bengt & Karin Aijmer. 2001. The English-Swedish Parallel Corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory: Papers from the 20th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20) Freiburg im Breisgau 1999, 15-33.
4. (Languages and computers: Studies in practical linguistics 33.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
5. Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in discourse processes 20), 273-312. Norwood: Ablex.
6. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Ad-vances in discourse processes 20), 261-272. Norwood: Ablex.
8. Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. (Advances in discourse processes 20). Norwood: Ablex.
9. Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish (semi)-auxiliaries. A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Dendale, Patrick & Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3). 339-348.
11. Diewald, Gabriele. 2001. Scheinen-Probleme: Analogie, Konstruktionsvermischung und die Sogwirkung aktiver Grammatikalisationskanä le. In Reimar Müller & Marga Reis (eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, 87-110. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
12. Duden. 1996. Deutsches Universalwörterbuch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
13. Dyvik, Helge. 1998. A translational basis for semantics. In Stig Johansson & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Corpora and cross-linguistic research: Theory, method, and case studies, 51-86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
14. Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Unpublished dissertation.
15. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1985. Truth and the indicative sentence. Studies in Language 9(2). 243-254.
16. Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization Vol 1, 17-35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. Johansson, Stig. 2001. The English verb seem and its correspondences in Norwegian: What seems to be the problem? In Karin Aijmer (ed.), A wealth of English: Studies in honour of Göran Kjellmer (Gothenburg Studies in English 81), 221-245. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
18. Kibbee, Douglas A. 1995. Assertion/atténuation, subjectivité /objectivité en anglais et en français: 'seem'/'sembler'. In Michel Ballard (ed.), Relations discursives et traduction, 73-87. Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille.
19. Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization (Topics in English linguistics, 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303-318.
21. Mithun, Marianne. 1986. Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in discourse processes 20), 89-112.Norwood: Ablex.
22. Noël, Dirk. 2002. Believe-type matrix verbs and their complements. Corpus-based investigations of their functions in discourse. A collection of articles. PhD disseration, Ghent University.
23. Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. (Human cognitive processing 5.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd edn. 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Palmer. Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
27. Sanders, José & Wilbert Spooren. 1996. Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: A study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive Linguistics 7. 241-264.
28. Usoniene, Aurelia. 2000. On the modality of the English verbs of seeming. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14. 185-205.
29. Usoniene, Aurelia. 2002. On the syntax-semantics interface: Verbs of perception in English and Lithuanian. Thesis for habilitation. Vilnius.
30. Viberg, Åke. 2005. The lexical typological profile of Swedish mental verbs. Languages in contrast (2004-2005) 5(1). 121-157.
31. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. Lingua mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.
32. Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51-97.
33. Woodbury, Anthony C. 1986. Interaction of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (Advances in discourse processes 20.), 188-202. Norwood: Ablex.