Dynamic angular three-dimensional measurement of multisegmental thoracolumbar motion in vivo

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 2326-2333

  Gercek, Erol ^a   Hartmann, Frank ^a   Kuhn, Sebastian ^a   Degreif, Jurgen ^b   Rommens, Pol Maria ^a   Rudig, Lothar ^c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery   (Germany)

^c Gesundheits und Pflegezentrum Russelsheim   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; In vivo measurement; Segmental motion; Thoracolumbar spine

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; DYNAMIC EXERCISE; ERROR; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; KIRSCHNER WIRE; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPINE MOBILITY; THORACIC SPINE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD; VERTEBRA;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65849366732     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818096ea     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Knop C, Blauth M, Buhren V, et al. [Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition. I. Epidemiology]. Der Unfallchirurg 1999;102: 924-35.
2. Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion - comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991;71: 98-104; discussion 5-6.
3. Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 1985;10:262-76.
4. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Chang DG, et al. Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 1991;16: 562-71.
5. Gilliam J, Brunt D, MacMillan M, et al. Relationship of the pelvic angle to the sacral angle: measurement of clinical reliability and validity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:193-9.
6. Boocock MG, Jackson JA, Burton AK, et al. Continuous measurement of lumbar posture using flexible electrogoniometers. Ergonomics 1994;37: 175-85.
7. Ng JK, Kippers V, Richardson CA, et al. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values. Spine 2001; 26:53-60.
8. Viitanen JV, Kokko ML, Lehtinen K, et al. Correlation between mobility restrictions and radiologic changes in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 1995;20: 492-6.
9. KuligK, LandelR, Powers CM. Assessment oflumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34:57-64.
10. Wing P, Tsang I, Gagnon F, et al. Diurnal changes in the profile shape and range of motion of the back. Spine 1992;17:761-6.
11. Gracovetsky S, Kary M, Levy S, et al. Analysis of spinal and muscular activity during flexion/extension and free lifts. Spine 1990;15:1333-9.
12. Bull AM, McGregor AH. Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000;15:772-6.
13. Nelson JM, Walmsley RP, Stevenson JM. Relative lumbar and pelvic motion during loaded spinal flexion/extension. Spine 1995;20:199-204.
14. Pearcy MJ. Twisting mobility of the human back in flexed postures. Spine 1993;18:114-19.
15. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1990.
16. Leferink VJ, Nijboer JM, Zimmerman KW, et al. Thoracolumbar spinal fractures: segmental range of motion after dorsal spondylodesis in 82 patients: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 2002;11:2-7.
17. Gregersen GG, Lucas DB.Aninvivo studyof the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1967;49:247-62.
18. GunzburgR,Hutton W, Fraser R. Axial rotation ofthe lumbar spine and the effect of flexion. An in vitro and in vivo biomechanical study. Spine 1991; 16:22-8.
19. Steffen T, Rubin RK, Baramki HG, et al. A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results. Spine 1997;22:156-66.
20. Lumsden RM II, Morris JM. An in vivo study of axial rotation and immo-blization at the lumbosacral joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1968;50:1591-602.
21. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara M, et al. Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26:147-54.
22. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, et al. Precision measurement of seg-mental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996;11:457-65.
23. Ochia RS, Inoue N, Takatori R, et al. In vivo measurements of lumbar segmental motion during axial rotation in asymptomatic and chronic low back pain male subjects. Spine 2007;32:1394-9.
24. Panjabi M, Chang D, Dvorak J. An analysis of errors in kinematic parameters associated with in vivo functional radiographs. Spine 1992;17:200 -5.
25. Panjabi MM, Goel VK, Walter SD. Errors in kinematic parameters of a planar joint: guidelines for optimal experimental design. J Biomech 1982; 15:537-44.
26. Pearcy MJ. Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;212:1-45.
27. Pearcy MJ, Whittle MW. Movementsof the lumbar spine measured bythree-dimensional X-ray analysis. J Biomed Eng 1982;4:107-12.
28. Stokes IA, Wilder DG, Frymoyer JW, et al. 1980 Volvo award in clinical sciences. Assessment of patients with low-back pain by biplanar radio-graphic measurement of intervertebral motion. Spine 1981;6:233-40.
29. Lee S, Harris KG, Nassif J, et al. In vivo kinematics of the cervical spine. Part 1: development of a roentgen stereophotogrammetric technique using metallic markers and assessment of its accuracy. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:522-34.
30. Shirazi-Adl A. Analysisof role of bone compliance on mechanics of a lumbar motion segment. J Biomech Eng 1994;116:408-12.
31. Panjabi M, Yamamoto I, Oxland T, et al. How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 1989;14:1002-11.
32. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 1984;9: 582-7.
33. Cholewicki J, Crisco JJ III, Oxland TR, et al. Effects of posture and structure on three-dimensional coupled rotations in the lumbar spine. A biomechani-cal analysis. Spine 1996;21:2421- 8.
34. Oxland TR, Crisco JJ III, Panjabi MM, et al. The effect of injury on rotational coupling at the lumbosacral joint. A biomechanical investigation. Spine 1992;17:74-80.
35. Lund T, Nydegger T, Schlenzka D, et al. Three-dimensional motion patterns during active bending in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2002; 27:1865-74.