Asymmetries in language use reveal asymmetries in the grammar

Proceedings of the 15th Amsterdam Colloquium

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 113-118

  Hendriks, Petra ^a   De Hoop, Helen ^b   Lamers, Monique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65849353905     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Chapman, R.S. and J.F. Miller: 1975, Word order in early two and three word utterances: Does production precede comprehension?, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18, 346-354.
2. Frisch, S. and M. Schlesewsky: 2001, The N400 indicates problems of thematic hierarchising, NeuroReport 12, 3391-3394.
3. Hendriks, P. and H. de Hoop: 2001, Optimality theoretic semantics, Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 1-32.
4. de Hoop, H. and M. Lamers: To appear, Incremental distinguishability of subject and object, in L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, & P. de Swart (eds.), Case, Valency, and Transitivity, Amsterdam.
5. Koster, C.: 1993, Errors in anaphora acquisition, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
6. McClellan, J., C. Yewchuk and G. Holdgrafer: 1986, Comprehension and production of word order by 2-year-old children, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 152, 97- 116.
7. McDonald, J.: 1987, Assigning linguistic roles: The influence of conflicting cues, Journal of Memory and Language 26, 100-117.
8. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky: 2004, Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar, Blackwell.
9. Schlesewsky, M. and I. Bornkessel: 2004, On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension, Lingua 114, 1213-1234.