Training supervisors of practitioners: Analysis of efficacy

Clinical Supervisor

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 76-96

  Kaiser, Tamara L ^a   Kuechler, Carol F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Efficacy of training for supervisors; Evaluation of supervisory training; Power in supervision; Supervision of practitioners; Supervisory relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 65749121076     PISSN: 07325223     EISSN: 1545231X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07325220802221538     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Austin, M., & Hopkins, K. (2004). Defining the learning organization. In A. Austin & K. Hopkins (Eds.), Supervision as collaboration in the human services: Building a learning culture (pp. 11-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Berg, G. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Bogo, M., & McKnight, K. (2005). Clinical supervision in social work: A review of the research literature. The Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2), 49-67.
4. College of St. Catherine/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work (1994). Boundary dilemmas in supervision. A training videotape produced by the College of St. Catherine/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work: St. Paul, MN.
5. Cohen, C., & Noble, D. (2005). Regulating clinical supervision: The role of licensing boards in setting standards for supervisory practice in social work. Presented at the First International Interdisciplinary Conference on Clinical Supervision. Buffalo, NY.
6. Cousins, C. (2004). Becoming a social work supervisor: A significant role transition. Australian Social Work, 57(2), 175-185.
7. Doehrman, M. J. G. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40(1), 3-104.
8. Eckstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
9. Gibelman, M., & Schervish, P. H. (1993). Who we are: The social work labor force as reflected in the NASW membership. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
10. Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
11. Kahn, E. (1979). The parallel process in social work treatment and supervision. Social Casework, 60, 520-528.
12. Kaiser, T. L. (1997). Supervisory relationships: Exploring the human element. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
13. Kaiser, T. L., & Barretta-Herman, A. (1999). The supervision institute: A model for supervisory training. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(1), 33-46.
14. Kaiser, T. L., Kuechler, C. F., & Barretta-Herman, A. (2000). Challenges in cross cultural supervision. A training videotape produced by the College of St. Catherine/University of St. Thomas School of Social Work Supervision Institute: St.Paul, MN.
15. Kuechler, C. F. (1998). The consultation circle: A model for team consultation. In A. Daly (Ed.), Workplace diversity: Issues and perspectives (pp. 253-264). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
16. Kuechler, C. F. (2006). Practitioners' voices: Group supervisors reflect on their practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 25(1/2), 83-103.
17. Gibelman, M., & Schervish, P. H. (1993). Who we are: The social work labor force as reflected in the NASW membership. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
18. Monette, D., Sullivan, T., & Dejong, C. (2008). Applied social research: A tool for the human services (7th ed.). Belomont, CA: Thompson/Brooks Cole.
19. Munson, C. E. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). New York: The Haworth Social Work Practice Press.
20. Peterson, M. (1992). At personal risk: Boundary violations in professional-client relationships. New York: W.W. Norton.
21. Peyer, S., & Berglund, K. (1998). Who's teaching whom: The parallel process of field instructor and student. Reflections, 4(2), 45-61.
22. Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primavera, L. H., & Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 37-48.
23. Reamer, F. G. (2005). Documentation in social work: Evolving ethical and risk-management standards. Social Work, 50(4), 325-334.
24. Ringle, S. (2001). In the shadow of death: Relational paradigms in clinical supervision. The Clinical Social Work Journal, 29(2), 171-179.
25. Shulman, L. (1982). Skills of supervision and staff management. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
26. Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
27. Strong, J., Kavanagh, D., Wilson, J., Spence, S., Worrall, L., & Crow, N. (2003). Supervision practice for allied health professionals within a large mental health service: Exploring the phenomenon. The Clinical Supervisor, 22(1), 191-210.
28. Weinbach, R. W. (2008). The social worker as manager: A practical guide to success (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Williams, A. B. (2000). Field instruction and the mature student: Contribution of supervisors' covert communication to the parallel process. Dissertation, University of Houston.