A procedure to estimate proximate analysis of mixed organic wastes

Water Environment Research

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 407-415

  Zaher, U ^a   Buffiere, P ^b   Steyer, J P ^c   Chen, S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c LABORATOIRE DE BIOTECHNOLOGIE DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

ADM1; Anaerobic digestion; Continuity based interfacing methodology; Elemental continuity; Practical measurement; Substrate composition

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ESTIMATION; FERTILIZERS; ORGANIC CARBON; PROTEINS; SOLID WASTES; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTES;

ADM1; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MODEL; CONTINUITY-BASED INTERFACING; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELEMENTAL CONTINUITY; INTERNATIONAL WATER ASSOCIATION; SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION; WASTE CHARACTERIZATION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON; HYDROGEN; LIPID; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS; PROTEIN; ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; DIGESTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ANAEROBIC CAPACITY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DEGRADATION; FIBER; MACRONUTRIENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; ORGANIC WASTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLID WASTE; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANAEROBIC PROCESS; CARBOHYDRATES; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DIGESTION; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; MANURE; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS; PROTEINS; SEWAGE; SOLID WASTES;

ANIMALIA;

HYDROGEN; NITROGEN; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

EID: 65649136064     PISSN: 10614303     EISSN: 15547531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2175/106143008X370548     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, D.C.
2. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (1998) Manure Production and Characteristics, In ASAE Standards, 45th ed., section D384.1; American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, Michigan, 646-648.
3. AOAC International (2007) AOAC Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, Maryland.
4. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, Vol. 1, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, Virginia.
5. Batstone, D. J.; Keller, J.; Angelidaki, R. I.; Kalyuzhnyi, S. V.; Pavlostathis, S. G.; Rozzi, A.; Sanders, W. T. M.; Siegrist, H.; Vavilin, V. A. (2002) Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1, Scientific and Technical Report No. 13; IWA Publishing: London, United Kingdom.
6. Bernard, O.; Hadj-Sadok, Z.; Dochain, D.; Genovesi, A.; Steyer, J. P. (2001) Dynamical Model Development and Parameter Identification for an Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Process. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 75, 424-438.
7. Buffiere, P.; Loisel, D.; Bernet, N.; Delgenes, J.-P. (2006) Towards New Indicators for the Prediction of Solid Waste Anaerobic Digestion Properties. Water Sci. Technol., 53 (8), 233-241.
8. Copp, J.; Jeppsson, U.; Rosen, C. (2003) Towards an ASM1-ADM1 State Variable Interface for Plant-Wide Wastewater Treatment Modeling. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exposition and Conference, Los Angeles, California, Oct. 11-15; Water Environment Federation: Alexandria, Virginia.
9. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (2007) Phyllis Database for Biomass and Waste. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands: Petten, Netherlands, http://www.ecn.nl/phyllis.
10. Garcia de Cortazar, A. L.; Monzon, I. T. (2007) MODUELO 2: A New Version of an Integrated Simulation Model for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Environ. Modell. Softw., 22 (1), 59-72.
11. Goering, H. K.; Soest, P. J. (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). In Agriculture Handbook No. 379, Jacket No. 387-598; ARS-USDA: Washington, D.C.
12. Gujer, W.; Henze, M.; Mino, T.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (1999) Activated Sludge Model No. 3. Water Sci. Technol., 39 (1), 183-193.
13. Hartmann, H.; Ahring, B. K. (2006) Strategies for the Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: An Overview. Water Sci. Technol., 53 (8) 7-22.
14. Henze, M.; Gujer, W.; Mino, T.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2000) Activated Sludge Models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, Scientific and Technical Report No 9; IWA Publishing: London, United Kingdom.
15. Holm-Nielsen, J. B.; Dahl, C. K.; Esbensen, K. H. (2006) Representative Sampling for Process Analytical Characterization of Heterogeneous Bioslurry Systems: A Reference Study of Sampling Issues in PAT. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 83 (2), 114-126.
16. Islam, J.; Singhal, N. (2002) A One-Dimensional Reactive Multi-Component Landfill Leachate Transport Model. Environ. Modell. Softw., 17 (6), 531-543.
17. Johansen, J. E.; Bakke, R. (2006) Enhancing Hydrolysis with Microaeration. Water Sci. Technol., 53 (8), 43-50.
18. Kayhanian, M.; Tchobanoglous, G.; Mata-Alvarez, J. (1996) Development of a Mathematical Model for the Simulation of the Biodegradation of Organic Substrates in a High-Solids Anaerobic Digestion Process. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 66 (3), 312-322.
19. Kleerebzem, R.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2006) Waste Characterization for Implementation in ADM1. Water Sci. Technol., 54 (4), 167-174.
20. Lowry, O. H.; Rosebrough, N. J.; Fair, A. L.; Randall, R. J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265-275.
21. Mata-Alvarez, J.; Mace, S.; Llabres, P. (2000) Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Wastes-An Overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol., 74, 3-16.
22. Moosbrugger, R. E.; Wentzel, M. C.; Loewenthal, R. E.; Ekama, G. E.; Marais, G. v. R. (1993) Alkalinity Measurement: Part 3-A 5 pH Point Titration Method to Determine the Carbonate and SCFA Weak Acid/Bases in Aqueous Solution Containing Also Known Concentrations of Other Weak Acid/Bases. Water SA, 19, 29-40.
23. Neitsch, S. L.; Arnold, J. G.; Kiniry, J. R.; Williams, J. R. (2001) Solids and Water Assessment Tool, SWAT-Users Manual; USDA Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory: Temple, Texas.
24. Reichert, P.; Borchardt, D.; Henze, M.; Rauch, W.; Shanahan, P.; Somlyo'dy, L.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2001) River Water Quality Model No. 1, IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 12; IWA Publishing: London, United Kingdom.
25. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2007a) Agricultural Research Service 2005. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 18; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, D.C., http://www.ars. usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndl.
26. U.S. Department of Agriculture (1996) Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook, 210-vi-AWMFH, Rev. 1; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, D.C., http://www.info.usda.gov/CED/ftp/ CED/neh651-ch4.pdf.
27. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2007b) NRCS. Manure Characteristics, http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/pubs/manntr.html.
28. U.S. Department of Energy (2007) Biomass Feedstock Composition and Property Database. U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, D.C., http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/progs/search1.cgi.
29. Van Soest, P. J. (1963) Use of Detergent in the Analysis of Fibrous Feeds. A Rapid Method for the Determination of Fibre and Lignin. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., 46 (5), 829-835.
30. Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Rosen, C.; Zaher, U.; Copp, J.; Benedetti, L.; Ayesa, E.; Jeppsson, U. (2005) Continuity-Based Interfacing of Models for Wastewater Systems Described by Petersen Matrices. Water Sci. Technol., 52 (1-2), 493-500.
31. Yemm, E. W.; Willis, A. J. (1954) The Estimation of Carbohydrates in Plant Extracts by Anthrone. Biochemical. J., 57 (3), 508-513.
32. Zaher, U.; Grau, P.; Benedetti, L.; Ayesa, E.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2007) Transformers for Interfacing Anaerobic Digestion Models to Pre- and Post-Treatment Processes in a Plant-Wide Modelling Context. Environ. Modell. Softw., 22 (1), 40-58.
33. Zaher, U.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2005) Automatic Initialisation of Buffer Composition Estimation for On-Line Analysis of Unknown Buffer Solutions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 383 (4), 605-618.