Multiple focus

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 159-184

  Beck, Sigrid ^a   Vasishth, Shravan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649112870     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: 14774593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffp001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baayen, H. R. (2008), Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to data analysis. Cambridge University Press, UK.
2. Bates, D. & Sarkar, D. (2006), The lme4 Package. (http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/lme4.html).
3. Beaver, David & Brady Clark (2003), 'Always and Only: Why not all Focus Sensitive Operators are Alike'. Natural Language Semantics 11 323-62.
4. Beaver, David, Brady Clark, Edward Flemming, Florian Jaeger & Maria Wolters (2007), 'When Semantics Meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies on Second Occurrence Focus'. Language 83:245-76.
5. Beck, Sigrid (2006), 'Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation'. Natural Language Semantics 14:1-56.
6. Beck, Sigrid (2007), 'The grammar of focus interpretation'. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion Language? Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. 255-80.
7. Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & Harald Baayen (2007), 'Predicting the dative alternation'. In Bouma, G., Kraemer, I. and Zwarts, J. (eds.). Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. KNAW, Amsterdam, 69-94.
8. Büring, Daniel (2006), Been There, Marked That - A Tentative Theory of Second Occurrence Focus. UCLA, MS, CA.
9. Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara (2005), Interpreting Second Occurrence Focus. Potsdam, MS.
10. von Fintel, Kai (1994), Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
11. Geurts, Bart & Rob van der Sandt (2004), 'Interpreting Focus'. Theoretical Linguistics 30:1-44.
12. Gibson, E. (1998), 'Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies'. Cognition 68:1-76.
13. Gibson, E. (2000), 'Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity'. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita & W. O'Neil (eds.), Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M. & Lee, Y. (2006), 'Similarity-Based Interference During Language Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Tracking During Reading'. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 32:1304-21.
15. Grodner, D. & Gibson, E. (2005), 'Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input'. Cognitive Science 29:261-90.
16. Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (1980), A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review. 87:329-54.
17. Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (1992), A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review. 99: 122-49.
18. Kratzer, Angelika (1991), 'The Representation of Focus'. In von Stechow, A. & Wunderlich, D. (eds.). Sementics: A handbook of contemporary research. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. 825-34.
19. Krifka, Manfred (1991), 'A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions'. In Proceedings of SALT 1. Cornell, Ithaca, NY, 127-58.
20. Krifka, Manfred (1995), 'The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items'. Linguistic Analysis 25:209-57.
21. Krifka, Manfred (2006), 'Association with focus phrases'. In Valerie Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus. De Gruyter Berlin, New York. 105-36.
22. Lewis, R. L. & Vasishth, S. (2005), 'An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval'. Cognitive Science 29:1-45.
23. Lewis, Richard L., Vasishth, Shravan & Van Dyke, Julie (2006), 'Computational Principles of Working Memory in Sentence Comprehension'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 447-54.
24. Oberauer, Klaus & Reinhold Kliegl. (2006), A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 55: 601-26.
25. Quené, Hugo & van der Berg, H. (2004), 'On Multi-Level Modeling of Data from Repeated Measures Designs: A Tutorial'. Speech Communication 43:103-21.
26. Quené, Hugo & van der Berg, H. (2001), 'On Multi-Level Modeling as a Remedy Against the Language-as-Fixed-Effect Fallacy'. Manuscript.
27. Quené, Hugo & van der Berg, H. (2004), 'On Multi-Level Modeling of Data from Repeated Measures Designs: A Tutorial'. Speech Communication 43:103-21.
28. R Development Core Team (2006), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: Austria.
29. Rooth, Mats (1985), Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
30. Rooth, Mats (1992), 'A Theory of Focus Interpretation'. Natural Language Semantics 1:75-116.
31. Rooth, Mats (1996a), 'Focus'. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell, Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA. 272-97.
32. Rooth, Mats (1996b), 'On the Interface Principles for Intonational Focus'. Proceedings of SALT VI. CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
33. Rooth, Mats (2006), S-focus and Relativized Stress F. Handout, Universität Tübingen, June 12 2006.
34. Sauerland, Uli (2005), 'Don't Interpret Focus!'. In Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 9. Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
35. Schuetze, Carson T. (1996), The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements and Lingustic Methodology. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL.
36. Snijder, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. (1999), Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced modeling. Sage, London.
37. Van Dyke, Julie & Lewis, Richard L. (2003), 'Distinguishing Effects of Structure and Decay on Attachment and Repair: A Cue-based Parsing Account of Recovery from Misanalyzed Ambiguities'. Journal of Memory and Language 49:285-316.
38. Van Dyke, J. & McElree, Brian (2006), 'Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension'. Journal of Memory and Language 55 157-66.
39. Vasishth, Shravan & Richard L. Lewis (2006), 'Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining Both Locality and Antilocality Effects'. Language 82: 767-94.
40. Vasishth, Shravan, Sven Bruessow, Richard L. Lewis & Heiner Drenhaus (2008), 'Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical'. Cognitive Science 32: 685-712.
41. Wold, Dag (1996), 'Long distance selective binding: The case of focus'. In Proceedings of SALT 6, Cornell, Ithaca, NY. 311-28.