Analysis of cross-sectional univariate measurements for family dyads using linear mixed modeling

Journal of Family Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 130-151

  Knafl, George J ^a   Dixon, Jane K ^b   O'Malley, Jean P ^c   Grey, Margaret ^b   Deatrick, Janet A ^d   Gallo, Agatha M ^e   Knafl, Kathleen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Childhood chronic conditions; Dyadic family data; Intrafamilial correlation; Linear mixed modeling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FAMILY; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FAMILY; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 65649097703     PISSN: 10748407     EISSN: 1552549X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1074840709331641     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arminger, G., & Sobel, M.E. (1990). Pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 195-203.
2. Barnett, R.C., & Gareis, K.C. (2007). Shift work, parenting behaviours, and children's socio-emotional well-being: A within-family study. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 727-748.
3. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Brown, H., & Prescott, R. (1999). Applied mixed models in medicine. New York: John Wiley.
5. Campbell, L., & Kashy, D.A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
6. Cook, W.L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 500-509.
7. Cook, W.L., & Kenny, D.A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.
8. Epstein, N., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 9, 171-180.
9. Eyberg, S., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10. Eyberg, S., & Robinson, E. (1983). Conduct problem behavior: Standardization of a behavior rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Child Clinical Psychology, 12, 347-354.
11. Gilliard, J.L., Blanton, P.W., & Bartley, S.J. (2007). Gender and generation: The relative influence of intimacy and individuation with mother and with father for spousal intimacy and individuation among dual-earner husbands and wives. Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15, 350-358.
12. Kashy, D.A., & Snyder, D.K. (1995). Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research. Psychological Assessment, 7, 338-348.
13. Kenny, D.A., & Kashy, D.A. (1991). Analyzing interdependence in dyads. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 275-285). New York: Guilford.
14. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
15. Kenny, D.A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowicz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Knafl, G.J., Fennie, K.P., & O'Malley, J.P. (2006). Adaptive repeated measures modeling using likelihood cross-validation. In B. Bovaruchuk (Ed.), Proceedings second IASTED international conference on computational intelligence (pp. 422-427). Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
17. Knafl, G.J., Knafl, K.A., & McCorkle, R. (2005). Mixed models incorporating intra-familial correlation through spatial autoregressive methods. Research in Nursing and Health, 28, 348-356.
18. Larsen, A., & Olson, D.H. (1990). Capturing the complexity of family systems, integrating family theory, family scores, and family analysis. In A. C. Marcos & T. W. Draper (Eds.), Family variables: Conceptualization, measurement, and use (pp. 19-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Rayens, M.K., & Svavarsdottir, E.K. (2003). A new methodological approach in nursing research: An actor, partner, and interaction effect model for family outcomes. Research in Nursing and Health, 26, 409-419.
21. SAS Institute Inc. (2005). SAS/STAT 9.1 user's guide. Cary, NC: Author.
22. Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth curves. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
23. Thomson, E., & Williams, R. (1982). Beyond wives' family sociology: A method for analyzing couple data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 889-900.