Interfacing with Hamiltonian dynamics

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Kay, Alastair ^a,b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICITY; FIXED NUMBERS; GATE OPERATION; HAMILTONIAN DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PULSE SEQUENCE; PULSE STRENGTH; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM SYSTEM; SYSTEM COOLING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

HAMILTONIANS;

EID: 65649096013     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042330     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A. Kay, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012346 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012346
2. K. G. H. Vollbrecht and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 010501 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.010501
3. D. Nagaj and P. Wocjan, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032311 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032311
4. B. A. Chase and A. J. Landahl, e-print arXiv:0802.1207.
5. D. J. Shepherd, T. Franz, and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 020502 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.020502 (Pubitemid 44464359)
6. A. Kay, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 2006.
7. S. Lloyd, Science 261, 1569 (1993). 10.1126/science.261.5128.1569
8. S. Lloyd, A. J. Landahl, and Jean-Jacques E. Slotine, Phys. Rev. A 69, 012305 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012305
9. D. Burgarth and V. Giovannetti, in Proceedings of the Quantum Information and Many Body Quantum Systems, edited by, M. Ericsson, and, S. Montangero, (Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2008), p. 17
10. S. G. Schirmer, I. C. H. Pullen, and P. J. Pemberton-Ross, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062339 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062339
11. S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 207901 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.207901
12. D. Burgarth and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052315 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052315
13. Note that HST is not the Hamiltonian considered by Bose. However, in the single excitation subspace, the two are identical.
14. D. Burgarth and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052315 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052315
15. C. Albanese, M. Christandl, N. Datta, and A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230502 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.230502
16. A. Kay, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032306 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032306 (Pubitemid 43334257)
17. T. J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. B 74, 094411 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.094411
18. H. L. Haselgrove, Phys. Rev. A 72, 062326 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72. 062326 (Pubitemid 43272754)
19. T. J. Osborne and N. Linden, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052315 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052315
20. In the limit of Δ→, the two derivations give the same pulse. In fact, for small Δ, this derivation, by setting | 0 | 2 = n=- 1/2 | ψ (x) | 2 dx, seems to give better results numerically, but the pulses extend over longer time.
21. M. Christandl, N. Datta, T. C. Dorlas, A. Ekert, A. Kay, and A. J. Landahl, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032312 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032312
22. J. Fitzsimons and J. Twamley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 090502 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.090502 (Pubitemid 44330089)
23. M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, and A. J. Landahl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187902 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187902
24. A. Kay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010501 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.010501 (Pubitemid 46135117)
25. K. R. Brown, A. W. Harrow, and I. L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. A 70, 052318 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052318
26. After calculating the variation in T as a function of the energy, this can be derived more rigorously, taking into account the fact that the reflected wave packet is no longer Gaussian, and therefore its transmission probability is different.
27. By which we mean that when the wave packet is a long distance from the boundary, it is Gaussian.
28. A. Childs, e-print arXiv:0806.1972, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).