Atomic quasi-Bragg-diffraction in a magnetic field

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Domen, K F E M ^a   Jansen, M A H M ^a   Van Dijk, W ^a   Van Leeuwen, K A H ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

, ENERGY CONSERVATIONS; ATOM INTERFEROMETRIES; ATOM OPTICS; ATOMIC-BEAM SPLITTERS; BRAGG SCATTERINGS; COUNTERPROPAGATING; HOMOGENEOUS MAGNETIC FIELDS; LIGHT FIELDS; MAGNETIC ENERGIES; METASTABLE HELIUM ATOMS; POLARIZATION GRADIENTS; POLARIZED LASER BEAMS; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; SPLITTING ANGLES; THEORETICAL MODELS; TRANSVERSE VELOCITIES;

ATOMIC BEAMS; DIFFRACTION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; HELIUM; LASER BEAMS; LIGHT; MAGNETIC FIELDS;

ATOMS;

EID: 65549171664     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.043605     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. D. M. Giltner, R. W. McGowan, and S. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2638 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2638
2. Y. Torii, Y. Suzuki, M. Kozuma, T. Sugiura, T. Kuga, L. Deng, and E. W. Hagley, Phys. Rev. A 61, 041602 (R) (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.041602
3. P. J. Martin, B. G. Oldaker, A. H. Miklich, and D. E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 515 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.515
4. D. M. Giltner, R. W. McGowan, and S. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3966 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3966
5. M. K. Oberthaler, R. Abfalterer, S. Bernet, J. Schmiedmayer, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4980 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4980
6. S. Dürr, S. Kunze, and G. Rempe, Quantum Semiclassic. Opt. 8, 531 (1996). 10.1088/1355-5111/8/3/016
7. S. Dürr and G. Rempe, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1495 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1495
8. A. E. A. Koolen, G. T. Jansen, K. F. E. M. Domen, H. C. W. Beijerinck, and K. A. H. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. A 65, 041601 (R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.041601
9. H. Muller, S. W. Chiow, Q. Long, S. Herrmann, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 180405 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.180405
10. C. Keller, J. Schmiedmayer, A. Zeilinger, T. Nonn, S. Dürr, and G. Rempe, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 69, 303 (1999). 10.1007/s003400050810
11. H. Muller, S. W. Chiow, and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. A 77, 023609 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023609
12. T. Pfau, C. Kurtsiefer, C. S. Adams, M. Sigel, and J. Mlynek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3427 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3427
13. B. Dubetsky and P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063612 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.063612
14. The name "quasi-Bragg-scattering" is based on the shared characteristics with regular Bragg scattering: population of a single diffraction order due to (approximate) energy conservation. It is used in a more general sense than in Ref., where it refers to the transition regime between resonant Bragg and nonresonant Raman-Nath diffractions.
15. R. M. S. Knops, A. E. A. Koolen, H. C. W. Beijerinck, and K. A. H. van Leeuwen, Laser Phys. 9, 286 (1999).
16. M. A. H. M. Jansen, K. F. E. M. Domen, H. C. W. Beijerinck, and K. A. H. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. A 76, 053629 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.053629