Treatment: What was useful about that session? Clients' and therapists' comments after sessions in the UK alcohol treatment trial (UKATT)

Alcohol and Alcoholism

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 306-313

  Orford, Jim ^a   Hodgson, Ray ^b   Copello, Alex ^a   Krishnan, Mya ^a   de Madariaga, Marta ^c   Coulton, Simon ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Alcohol Education and Research Council   (United Kingdom)

^c Reading Community Mental Health Team for Older Adults   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED KINGDOM; ADDICTION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALCOHOLISM; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65549165520     PISSN: 07350414     EISSN: 14643502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agn112     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Anton R, O'Malley S, Ciraulo D et al. (2006) Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence. The COMBINE study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295 2003-17.
2. Luborsky L, Rosenthal R, Diguer L et al. (2002) The dodo bird verdict is alive and well - mostly. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 9 3-33.
3. Moos RH. (2007) Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend 88:109-21.
4. Orford J. (2008) Asking the right questions in the right way: The need for a shift in research on psychological treatments for addiction. Addiction 103:875-85.
5. Orford J, Hodgson R, Copello A et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2006b) The client's perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: Qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Addiction 101 60-8.
6. Orford J, Hodgson R, Copello A et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2008) To what factors do clients attribute change? Content analysis of follow-up interviews with clients of the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). J Subst Abuse Treat 36:49-58.
7. Orford J, Kerr C, Alwyn T et al. on behalf of the UKATT Research Team. (2006a) Why people enter treatment for alcohol problems: Findings from UKATT pre-treatment interviews. J Subst Use 11:161-76.
8. Orlinsky DE, Grawe K, Parks BK. (1994) Process and outcome in psychotherapy - Noch Einmal. In Bergin AE and Garfield SL. (eds). Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York: Wiley, 270-376.
9. Project MATCH Research Group. (1997) Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 58:7-29.
10. Project MATCH Research Group. (1999) A study to remember: Response of the Project MATCH Research Group to commentaries. Addiction 94 66-9.
11. Tober G, Clyne W, Finnegan O et al. (2008) Validation of a scale for rating the process of delivery of psycho-social treatments for alcohol dependence and misuse: The UKATT process rating scale (PRS). Alcohol Alcohol 43:675-82.
12. UKATT Research Team. (2001) United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT): Hypotheses, design and methods. Alcohol Alcohol 36 11-21.
13. UKATT Research Team. (2005a) Effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: Findings of the randomised United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). Br Med J 331:541-4.
14. UKATT Research Team. (2005b) Cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcohol problems: Findings of the randomised United Kingdom Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT). Br Med J 331:544-58.
15. Wampold B. (2001) The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods and Findings. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Williamson E, Smith M, Orford J et al. (2007) Social behaviour and network therapy for drug problems: Evidence of benefits and challenges. Addict Disord Treat 6:167-79.