Governmental filtering of websites: The Dutch case

Computer Law and Security Review

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 251-262

  Stol, W Ph ^a,c   Kaspersen, H K W ^b,c   Kerstens, J ^a,c   Leukfeldt, E R ^a,c   Lodder, A R ^b,c  

^a NHL STENDEN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Cybersafety Research and Education Network (CyREN)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Child abuse; Child pornography; Cybercrime; Internet; Police; Privacy

Indexed keywords

CHILD ABUSE; CHILD PORNOGRAPHY; CYBERCRIME; POLICE; PRIVACY;

COMPUTER CRIME; INTERNET; WEBSITES;

LAW ENFORCEMENT;

EID: 65549158586     PISSN: 02673649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BZK (Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations). Policing in the Netherlands (2004), BZK, Den Haag
2. Clayton R. Failures in a Hybrid Content Blocking System (2005), Cambridge MIT Institute (CMI), Cambridge
3. Deibert R.J., Palfrey J.G., Rohozinski R., and Zittrain J. Access Denied; the Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (2008), The Mitt Press, Cambridge, Mass
4. Deming W.E. The New Economics: for Industry, Government and Education (1993), Mass MIT Press, Cambridge
5. Deshmukh A., and Rajagopalan B. Performance analysis of filtering software using Signal Detection Theory. Decision Support Systems 42 (2005) 1015-1028
6. Edelman B. Web Sites Sharing IP Addresses: Prevalence and Significance (2003), Harvard Law School: Berkman Center for Internet and Society
7. Fleck MM, Forsyth DA, Bregler C. Finding naked people. In: fourth European Conf. on Computer Vision 1996;2:592-602.
8. Frissen P.H.A. Bureaucratische cultuur en informatisering (1989), Den Haag: Sdu-Uitgeverij
9. Geul A. Beleidsconstructie, coproductie en communicatie. Zes beproefde methodieken van beleidsontwikkeling (2005), Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers
10. Greenfield P., Rickwood R., and Tran H. Effectiveness of Internet filtering software products (2001), CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences
11. Haselton B. Report on accuracy rate of FortiGuard Filter (2007), Peacefire.org, Bellevue, WA
12. Hoogerwerf A. Beleid, processen en effecten. In: Hoogerwerf A., and Herweijer M. (Eds). Overheidsbeleid. Een inleiding in de beleidswetenschap (2008), Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
13. Hoppe R., Jeliazkova M., van de Graaf H., and Grin J. Beleidsnota's die (door)werken. Handleiding voor geslaagde beleidsvoorbereiding (2004), Coutinho, Bussum
14. Jones M.J., and Rehg J.M. Statistical color models with application to skin detection. Technical Report Series (1998), Cambridge Research Laboratory
15. Kingdom, J.W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman.
16. Kranich N. Why filters won't protect children or adults. Library Administartion and Management 18 1 (2004) 14-18
17. Mazmanian D.A., and Sabatier P.A. A multivariate model of public policy-making. American Journal of Political Science 24 (1980) 439-468
18. Michiels FCMA, Naeyé J, Blomberg AB, Boek JLM. Artikelsgewijs commentaar Politiewet 1993. Den Haag; 1997.
19. Muller E.R., Dubelaar M.J., and Cleiren C.P.M. Algemene beginselen van behoorlijke politiezorg. In: Fijnaut C.J.C.F., Muller E.R., Rosenthal U., and van der Torre E.J. (Eds). Politie, studies over haar werking en organisatie (2007), Kluwer, Deventer pp. 559-99
20. Oey H. Criminaliteitspreventie: kansen zien, kansen benutten (2001), Senter, Den Haag
21. ONI (OpenNet Initiative). Internet Filtering in Saudi Arabia in 2004; 2004.
22. ONI (OpenNet Initiative). Internet filtering in Iran in 2004-2005; 2005a.
23. ONI (OpenNet Initiative). Internet filtering in China in 2004-2005; 2005b.
24. PVP (Projectgroep Visie op de Politiefunctie). Politie in Ontwikkeling (2005), NPI, Den Haag
25. Resnick P., Hansen D., and Richardson C. Calculating error rates for filtering software. Communications of the ACM 47 9 (2004) 67-71
26. Richardson C., Resnick P., Hansen D., and Derry A. Does pornography blocking software block access to health information on the Internet?. Journal of American Medical Association 22 (2002) 2887-2894
27. Shewhart W.A. Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control (1939), Dover, New York
28. Shih J.L., Lee C.H., and Yang C.S. An adult image identification system employing image retrieval technique. Pattern Recognition Letters 28 16 (2007) 2367-2374
29. Stark Ph.B. Expert report of Philip B. Stark Ph.D. Civil Action no. 98-5591 (E.D. Pa) ACLU vs. Gonzales; 8 May 2006.
30. Stol W.P. Handhaven: eerst kiezen dan doen: technische mogelijkheden en beperkingen (2004), Ministerie van Justitie, Den Haag
31. Stol W.P. Trends in cybercrime. Justitiële Verkenningen. 30 8 (2004) 76-94
32. Stol W.P. Zin en onzin van politieautomatisering. In: Hilarides D. (Ed). Handboek Politiemanagement (1995), Samsom H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Alphen aan den Rijn sectie C4130, pp. 1-24
33. Stol W.Ph., Kaspersen H.K.W., Kerstens J., Leukfeldt E.R., and Lodder A.R. Filteren van kinderporno op internet ((Filtering Child Pronography on the Internet)) (2008), BJU, Den Haag
34. van Gestel B. Lokale media en politiek over cameratoezicht: een case studie. Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid 5 4 (2006) 34-52
35. van der Vijver CD, Meershoek AJ, Slobbe, DF. Kerntaken van de politie. Zeist: Kerckebosch; 2001.
36. Wang J.Z., Li J., Wiederhold G., and Firschein O. System for screening objectionable images. Computer Communication 21 (1998) 1355-1360
37. Yang J, Fu Z, Tan T, Hu W. A novel approach to detecting adult images. In: 17th International Conference on pattern recognition; 2004;4:479-82.
38. Yoo S.J. Intelligent multimedia information retrieval for identifying and rating adult images. KES (2004) 164-170
39. Zeng Wei, Gao Wen, Zhang, Tao, Liu, Yang. Image Guarder: an intelligent detector for adult. In: Asian Conf. on Computer Vision; 2004. p. 198-203.
40. Zittrain J., and Edelman B. Documentation of internet filtering in Saudi Arabia (2002), Harvard Law School: Berkman Center for Internet and Society