Prestress and adhesion site dynamics control cell sensitivity to extracellular stiffness

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 2009-2022

  Fereol S ^a,b   Fodil, R ^a,b   Laurent, V M ^a,b   Balland, M ^b,d   Louis, B ^a,b   Pelle, G ^a,b,c   Henon S ^b,d   Planus, E ^a,b   Isabey, D ^a,b  

^a INSERM U955   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^d CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; CYTOCHALASIN D;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; LUNG ALVEOLUS EPITHELIUM; LUNG ALVEOLUS MACROPHAGE; NONHUMAN; RAT; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIUM CELL; LUNG ALVEOLUS; MAGNETISM; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY TRACT MUCOSA; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TORQUE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACTOMYOSIN; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN TYPE I; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOCHALASIN D; ELASTIC MODULUS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; HUMANS; MACROPHAGES, ALVEOLAR; MAGNETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PULMONARY ALVEOLI; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RESPIRATORY MUCOSA; TORQUE;

EID: 65549155674     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.10.072     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Wong, J. Y., J. B. Leach, and X. Q. Brown. 2004. Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell - biomaterial interface: issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surf. Sci. 570:119-133.
2. Lo, C. M., H. B. Wang, M. Dembo, and Y. L. Wang. 2000. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J. 79:144-152.
3. Planus, E., S. Galiacy, M. Matthay, V. Laurent, J. Gavrilovic, et al. 1999. Role of collagenase in mediating in vitro alveolar epithelial wound repair. J. Cell Sci. 112:243-252.
4. Engler, A. J., M. A. Griffin, S. Sen, C. G. Bonnemann, H. L. Sweeney, et al. 2004. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J. Cell Biol. 166:877-887.
5. Yeung, T., P. C. Georges, L. A. Flanagan, B. Marg, M. Ortiz, et al. 2005. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 60:24-34.
6. Féréol, S., R. Fodil, B. Labat, S. Galiacy, V. M. Laurent, et al. 2006. Sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to substrate mechanical and adhesive properties. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 63:321-340.
7. Gao, M., M. Sotomayor, E. Villa, E. H. Lee, and K. Schulten. 2006. Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8:3692-3706.
8. Evans, E. 2001. Probing the relation between force - lifetime - and chemistry in single molecular bonds. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:105-128.
9. Bruinsma, R. F. 2005. Theory of force regulation by nascent adhesion sites. Biophys J. 89:87-94.
10. Choquet, D., D. P. Felsenfeld, and M. P. Sheetz. 1997. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 88:39-48.
11. Giannone, G., G. Jiang, D. H. Sutton, D. R. Critchley, and M. P. Sheetz. 2003. Talin1 is critical for force-dependent reinforcement of initial integrin-cytoskeleton bonds but not tyrosine kinase activation. J. Cell Biol. 163:409-419.
12. Galbraith, C. G., K. M. Yamada, and M. P. Sheetz. 2002. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol. 159:695-705.
13. Zamir, E., and B. Geiger. 2001. Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 114:3583-3590.
14. Block, M.R., C. Badowski, A. Millon-Fremillon, D. Bouvard, A. P. Bouin, et al. 2008. Podosome-type adhesions and focal adhesions, so alike yet so different. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 87:491-506.
15. Knoner, G., B. E. Rolfe, J. H. Campbell, S. J. Parkin, N. R. Heckenberg, et al. 2006. Mechanics of cellular adhesion to artificial artery templates. Biophys. J. 91:3085-3096.
16. Destaing, O., F. Saltel, J. C. Geminard, P. Jurdic, and F. Bard. 2003. Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actin-green fluorescent protein. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:407-416.
17. Collin, O., P. Tracqui, A. Stephanou, Y. Usson, J. Clement-Lacroix, et al. 2006. Spatiotemporal dynamics of actin-rich adhesion microdomains: influence of substrate flexibility. J. Cell Sci. 119:1914-1925.
18. Mizuno, D., C. Tardin, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. Mackintosh. 2007. Nonequilibrium mechanics of active cytoskeletal networks. Science. 315:370-373.
19. Alenghat, F. J., S. M. Nauli, R. Kolb, J. Zhou, and D. E. Ingber. 2004. Global cytoskeletal control of mechanotransduction in kidney epithelial cells. Exp. Cell Res. 301:23-30.
20. Gardel, M. L., F. Nakamura, J. Hartwig, J. C. Crocker, T. P. Stossel, et al. 2006. Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:088102.
21. Schaub, S., S. Bohnet, V. M. Laurent, J. J. Meister, and A. B. Verkhovsky. 2007. Comparative maps of motion and assembly of filamentous actin and myosin II in migrating cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:3723-3732.
22. Ingber, D. E. 2003. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116:1157-1173.
23. Chiquet, M., A. S. Renedo, F. Huber, and M. Fluck. 2003. How do fibroblasts translate mechanical signals into changes in extracellular matrix production? Matrix Biol. 22:73-80.
24. Linder, S., and M. Aepfelbacher. 2003. Podosomes: adhesion hot-spots of invasive cells. Trends Cell Biol. 13:376-385.
25. Planus, E., S. Galiacy, S. Fereol, R. Fodil, V. M. Laurent, et al. 2005. Apical rigidity of an epithelial cell monolayer evaluated by magnetic twisting cytometry: ICAM-1 versus integrin linkages to F-actin structure. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 33:277-291.
26. Pelham, R. J., Jr., and Y. Wang. 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:13661-13665.
27. Solon, J., I. Levental, K. Sengupta, P. C. Georges, and P. A. Janmey. 2007. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 93:4453-4461.
28. Laurent, V. M., S. Henon, E. Planus, R. Fodil, M. Balland, et al. 2002. Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs. optical tweezers. J. Biomech. Eng. 124:408-421.
29. Wang, N., J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber. 1993. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 260:1124-1127, [see comments].
30. Ohayon, J., P. Tracqui, R. Fodil, S. Fereol, V. M. Laurent, et al. 2004. Analysis of nonlinear responses of adherent epithelial cells probed by magnetic bead twisting: A finite element model based on a homogenization approach. J. Biomech. Eng. 126:685-698.
31. Wendling, S., E. Planus, V. Laurent, L. Barbe, A. Mary, et al. 2000. Role of cellular tone and microenvironmental conditions on cytoskeleton stiffness assessed by tensegrity model. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 9:51-62.
32. Lenormand, G., S. Henon, A. Richert, J. Simeon, and F. Gallet. 2003. Elasticity of the human red blood cell skeleton. Biorheology. 40: 247-251.
33. Caille, N., O. Thoumine, Y. Tardy, and J. J. Meister. 2002. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 35:177-187.
34. Katoh, K., M. Masuda, Y. Kano, Y. Jinguji, and K. Fujiwara. 1995. Focal adhesion proteins associated with apical stress fibers of human fibroblasts. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 31:177-195.
35. Tanaka, J., T. Watanabe, N. Nakamura, and K. Sobue. 1993. Morphological and biochemical analyses of contractile proteins (actin, myosin, caldesmon and tropomyosin) in normal and transformed cells. J. Cell Sci. 104:595-606.
36. Pourati, J., A. Maniotis, D. Spiegel, J. L. Schaffer, J. P. Butler, et al. 1998. Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? Cell Physiol. 43:C1283-C1289.
37. Laurent, V. M., R. Fodil, P. Cañadas, E. Planus, and D. Isabey. 2002. Specific mechanical and structural responses of cortical and cytosolic cytoskeleton in living adherent cells. JSME Int. J. 45:897-905 (Series C).
38. Hirata, H., H. Tatsumi, and M. Sokabe. 2007. Dynamics of actin filaments during tension-dependent formation of actin bundles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1770:1115-1127.
39. Li, F., S. D. Redick, H. P. Erickson, and V. T. Moy. 2003. Force measurements of the alpha5beta1 integrin-fibronectin interaction. Biophys. J. 84:1252-1262.
40. Wang, M., Y. Cao, and H. Li. 2006. The unfolding and folding dynamics of TNfn ALL probed by single molecule force-ramp spectroscopy. Polymer. 47:2548-2554.
41. Carrion-Vazquez, M., A. F. Oberhauser, S. B. Fowler, P. E. Marszalek, S. E. Broedel, et al. 1999. Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: a comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:3694-3699.
42. Wang, N., I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, J. Chen, S. M. Mijailovich, J. P. Butler, et al. 2002. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282:C606-C616.
43. Stamenovic, D., S. M. Mijailovich, I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, J. Chen, and N. Wang. 2002. Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282:C617-C624.
44. Cañadas, P., V. M. Laurent, C. Oddou, D. Isabey, and S. Wendling. 2002. A cellular tensegrity model to analyze the structural viscoelasticity of the cytoskeleton. J. Theor. Biol. 218:155-173.
45. Takagi, J., B. M. Petre, T. Walz, and T. A. Springer. 2002. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell. 110:599-611.
46. Engler, A., L. Bacakova, C. Newman, A. Hategan, M. Griffin, et al. 2004. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86:617-628.
47. Zaman, M. H., R. D. Kamm, P. Matsudaira, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 2005. Computational model for cell migration in three-dimensional matrices. Biophys. J. 89:1389-1397.
48. Schwarz, U. S., T. Erdmann, and I. B. Bischofs. 2006. Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. Biosystems. 83:225-232.
49. Jiang, G., G. Giannone, D. R. Critchley, E. Fukumoto, and M. P. Sheetz. 2003. Two-pico newton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin. Nature. 424:334-337.
50. Thoumine, O., A. Ott, and D. Louvard. 1996. Critical centrifugal forces induce adhesion rupture or structural reorganization in cultured cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 33:276-287.
51. Zamir, E., M. Katz, Y. Posen, N. Erez, K. M. Yamada, et al. 2000. Dynamics and segregation of cell-matrix adhesions in cultured fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:191-196.
52. Geiger, B., and A. Bershadsky. 2001. Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:584-592.
53. Wang, N., and Z. Suo. 2005. Long-distance propagation of forces in a cell. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 328:1133-1138.
54. Cai, S., L. Pestic-Dragovich, M. E. O'Donnell, N. Wang, D. Ingber, et al. 1998. Regulation of cytoskeletal mechanics and cell growth by myosin light chain phosphorylation. Am. J. Physiol. 275: C1349-C1356.
55. Balland, M., A. Richert, and F. Gallet. 2005. The dissipative contribution of myosin II in the cytoskeleton dynamics of myoblasts. Eur. Biophys. J. 34:255-261.
56. Wendling, S., C. Oddou, and D. Isabey. 1999. Stiffening response of a cellular tensegrity model. J. Theor. Biol. 196:309-325.
57. Balaban, N. Q., U. S. Schwarz, D. Riveline, P. Goichberg, G. Tzur, et al. 2001. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:466-472.
58. Riveline, D., E. Zamir, N. Q. Balaban, U. S. Schwarz, T. Ishizaki, et al. 2001. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153:1175-1186.
59. Icard-Arcizet, D., O. Cardoso, A. Richert, and S. Henon. 2008. Cell stiffening in response to external stress is correlated to actin recruitment. Biophys. J. 94:2906-2913.
60. Ridley, A. J., and A. Hall. 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell. 70:389-399.
61. Besser, A., and U. S. Schwarz. 2007. Coupling biochemistry and mechanics in cell adhesion: a model for inhomogeneous stress fiber contraction. N. J. Phys. 9:425.
62. Jones, G. E., W. E. Allen, and A. J. Ridley. 1998. The Rho GTPases in macrophage motility and chemotaxis. Cell Adhes. Commun. 6:237-245.
63. Ridley, A. J. 2008. Regulation of macrophage adhesion and migration by Rho GTP-binding proteins. J. Microsc. 231:518-523.
64. Evans, E., A. Leung, and D. Zhelev. 1993. Synchrony of cell spreading and contraction force as phagocytes engulf large pathogens. J. Cell Biol. 122:1295-1300.
65. Beningo, K. A., and Y. L. Wang. 2002. Fc-receptor-mediated phagocytosis is regulated by mechanical properties of the target. J. Cell Sci. 115:849-856.
66. Ingber, D. E. 2003. Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J. Cell Sci. 116:1397-1408.
67. Burgstaller, G., and M. Gimona. 2004. Actin cytoskeleton remodeling via local inhibition of contractility at discrete microdomains. J. Cell Sci. 117:223-231.