The principle of proportionality in biometrics:Case studies from Norway

Computer Law and Security Review

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 237-250

  Liu, Yue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biometric Information; Biometrics; Data Protection; Norwegian Cases; Proportionality

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC INFORMATION; BIOMETRIC SYSTEMS; DATA PROTECTION; LEGAL FACTORS; MEMBER STATE; NORWEGIAN CASES; PROPORTIONALITY; WORKING PARTIES;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 65549146239     PISSN: 02673649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adler A., Dai T., and Lionheart W.R.B. Temporal image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography. Physiological Measurement 28 (2007) S1-S11
2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. Working documents on biometrics (No. 12168/02/EN, WP 80): Data Protection Working Party, 2003.
3. Barr M. I'm not really read up on genetics: biobanks and the social context of informed consent. BioSocieties 1 1 (2006) 251-262
4. Brekke O.A., and Sirnes T. Population biobanks: the ethical gravity of informed consent. BioSocieties 1 (2006) 385-398
5. Bygrave L. Data Protection Law: approaching its rationale, logic and limits' Kluwer Law International (2002), Kluwer Law International, Hague, London, New York
6. Bygrave LA, Schartum DW. Consent, proportionality and collective power. In: Gutwirth S, Poullet Y, De Hert P, de Terwangne C, Nouwt S, editors. Reinventing Data Protection? Springer; 2009. p. 157-73.
7. Cavoukian A. Biometric encryption: a positive-sum technology that achieves strong authentication, security AND privacy. Retrieved March 8, 2007, from http://www.ipc.on.ca/images/Resources/up-bio_encryp_execsum.pdf, 2007.
8. Craig P., and Burca G. EU law (2008), Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Data Inspectorate. Notat fra Datatilsynet - forslag til revisjon av personopplysningslovens § 12. og ny bestemmelse om bruk av biometriske data. Retrieved Dec, 12 2006, from http://www.datatilsynet.no/upload/Dokumenter/saker/2006/Revisjon_12_biometri.pdf, 2006a.
10. Data Inspectorate. Notat fra Datatilsynet - forslag til revisjon av personopplysningslovens § 12. og ny bestemmelse om bruk av biometriske data. Retrieved Dec, 12 2006 from http://www.datatilsynet.no/upload/Dokumenter/saker/2006/Revisjon_12_biometri.pdf, 2006b.
11. Data Protection Working Party. Working documents on biometrics (No. 12168/02/EN WP 80): Data Protection Working Party, 2003.
12. Datatilsynet. Notat fra Datatilsynet - forslag til revisjon av personopplysningslovens § 12. og ny bestemmelse om bruk av biometriske data. Retrieved Dec,12, 2006, from http://www.datatilsynet.no/upload/Dokumenter/saker/2006/Revisjon_12_biometri.pdf, 2006.
13. De Hert P. Biometrics: legal issues and implications, background paper for the Institute of Prospective Technological Studies, DC JRC-Sevilla, European Commission: Background paper for the Institute of Prospective Technological Studies. DC JRC-Sevilla, European Commission (2005)
14. De Hert P., Schreurs W., and Brouwer E. Machine-readable identity documents with biometric data in the EU. Journal of Documents and Identity 21 (2006) 32
15. Dennis C. Biometrics and the prevention of identity theft. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.biometricgroup.com/in_the_news/senate.html, 2002.
16. Department of Homeland Security. Additional guidance and security control are needed over systems using RFID at DHS. Retrieved Nov 5, 2007, from http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIGr_06-53_Jul06.pdf, 2006.
17. Ellies E. The principle of proportionality in the Laws of Europe (1999), Hart Publishing, Oxford
18. Europa. (n.d). Glossary: proportionality principle. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from http://europa.eu/scadplus/glossary/proportionality_en.htm.
19. European Commission Information Society and Media. A fine balance 2007 - privacy enhancing technologies - executive summary. Proceeding of the Conference of A Fine Balance London, 2007, 21 Nov.
20. European Data Protection Supervisor. Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council amending the Common Consular Instructions on visas for diplomatic missions and consular posts in relation to the introduction of biometrics including provisions on the organisation of the reception and processing of visa applications (COM (2006) 269 final) - 2006/0088 (COD) (2006/C 321/14) Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2006/06-10-27_CCI_EN.pdf, 2006.
21. Flesland A. Begrenset adgang til bruk av biometriske kjennetegn. Retrieved Feb 14, 2006, from http://www.datatilsynet.no/templates/Page____1342.aspx, 2006 (in Norwegian).
22. Greenleaf G, Clarke R. Privacy implications of digital signature. Retrieved Aug 15, 2005, from http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/DigSig.html, 1997.
23. Hachez G, no date. Biometrics, access control, smart cards: a not so simple combination, Work partially done within the European IST project BANCA. Retrieved July 9, 2007, from http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/files/publications/pdf17.pdf.
24. Information Commissioner's Office. The use of biometrics in schools. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/detailed_specialist_guides/fingerprinting_final_view.pdf, 2007.
25. Levitt M., and Weldon S. A well placed trust? Public perceptions of the governance of DNA databases. Critical Public Health (2005)
26. Liu Y. Identifying legal concerns in the biometric context. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology 3 1 (2008) 45-54
27. National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences. Biometrics, identifying data and human rights. Retrieved July 1, 2007, from http://www.libertysecurity.org/IMG/pdf_avis098.pdf, 2007.
28. Neuwirt K. Council of Europe report on the protection of personal data with regard to the use of smart cards. Retrieved Feb, 3 2006, from http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/data_protection/documents/Reports/T-SmartCards%202001.asp, 2001.
29. Schiphol Group. General terms and conditions Privium. Retrieved July 5 2007, from http://www.schiphol.nl/media/portal/privium/pdf/pdf_files/alg_voorw_uk_v1_m56577569830689445.pdf, 2007.
30. Struve M.G. The less-restrictive-alternative principle and economic due process. Harvard Law Review 80 7 (1967 May) 1463-1488
31. Svigal J. Smart cards-a security assessment. Computer and Security 13 (1994) 107-114
32. The Consultative Committee established by the Council of Europe's Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data of 1981. Progress report on the application of the principles of Convention 108 to the collection and processing of biometric Data. Retrieved June 1, 2007 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/3-t-pd-2005-biom_e_en.pdf, 2005.
33. Tranberg C.B. Persondata og biometri i Skandinavien. Lov & Data 90 Juni (2007) 1-5
34. Tranberg C.B. Necessary processing of personal data. Legal Privacy and Security Issues in Information Technology 2 (2007) 347-360
35. Tuyls P., and Goseling J. Capacity and examples of template protecting biometric authentication systems. In: Maltoni D., and Jain A.K. (Eds). BioAW 2004LNCS3087 (2004) 158-170
36. Wilson S. Lockstep submission to senate privacy inquiry. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/legcon_ctte/privacy/submissions/sub11.pdf, 2005.
37. Zorkadis V., and Donos P. On biometrics-based authentication and identification from a privacy-protection perspective. Information Management & Computer Security 12 1 (2004) 125-137