Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages

Poultry Science

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 698-707

  Tactacan, G B ^a   Guenter, W ^a   Lewis, N J ^a   Rodriguez Lecompte, J C ^a   House, J D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone; Cage; Laying hen; Production

Indexed keywords

AVES;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHICKENS; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; OVIPOSITION;

EID: 65549114064     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00369     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrahamsson, P., and R. Tauson. 1995. Aviary systems and conven- tional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and birds' location in three hybrids. Acta Agric. Scand. 45:191-203.
2. Abrahamsson, P., and R. Tauson. 1997. Effects of group size on performance, health and birds' use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens. Acta Agric. Scand. 47:254-260.
3. Abrahamsson, P., R. Tauson, and M. C. Appleby. 1995. Performance of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages. Acta Agric. Scand. 47:254-260.
4. Abrahamsson, P., R. Tauson, and K. Elwinger. 1996. Effect on pro- duction, health and egg quality of varying proportions of wheat and barley in diets for two hybrids of laying hens kept in different housing systems. Acta Agric. Scand. 46:254-260.
5. Appleby, M. C. 1993. Should cages for laying hens be banned or modified? Anim. Welf. 2:67-80.
6. Appleby, M. C., S. F. Smith, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: Effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:835-847.
7. Appleby, M. C., A. W. Walker, C. J. Nicol, A. C. Lindberg, R. Freire, B. O. Hughes, and H. A. Elson. 2002. Development of furnished cages for laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:489-500.
8. Barnett, J. L., P. C. Glatz, E. A. Newman, and G. M. Cronin. 1997. Effects of modifying layer cages with perches on stress physiol- ogy, plumage, pecking and bone strength of hens. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 37:523-529.
9. Baxter, M. R. 1994. The welfare problems of laying hens in battery cages. Vet. Rec. 134:614-619.
10. Canadian Agri-Food Research Council. 2003. Recommended code of practice for the care and handling of pullets, layers and spent fowl. CARC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
11. Canadian Coalition for Farm Animals. 2005. Canadian wants more humane eggs and pork in grocery stores and fast food restaurants. http://www.humanefood.ca/eggindustry.html Accessed June 2007.
12. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
13. Craig, J. V., and J. A. Craig. 1985. Corticosteroid levels in White Leghorn hens as affected by handling, laying-house environment, and genetic stock. Poult. Sci. 64:809-816.
14. Craig, J. V., J. A. Craig, and J. Vargas. 1986. Corticosteroids and other indicators of hens' well-being in four laying house environments. Poult. Sci. 65:856-863.
15. Craig, J. V., and J. C. Swanson. 1994. Review. Welfare perspectives on hens kept for egg production. Poult. Sci. 73:921-938.
16. Davis, G. S., K. S. Anderson, and A. S. Carrol. 2000. The effects of long-term caging and molt of Single Comb White Leghorn horns. Poult. Sci. 79:514-518.
17. Davis, A. K., K. C. Cook, and S. Altizer. 2004. Leukocyte profiles of house finches with and without mycoplasmal conjunctivitis, a recently emerged bacterial disease. EcoHealth 1:362-373.
18. Edens, F. W., G. A. Martin, and T. A. Carter. 1982. Stress responses of two layer stocks in five cage densities compared to floor birds. Poult. Sci. 61:1456-1462.
19. Emmans, G. C., and D. R. Charles. 1977. Climatic environment and poultry feeding in practice. Pages 31-49 in Nutrition and the Climatic Environment. W. Haresign, H. Swan, and D. Lewis, ed. Butterworths, London, UK.
20. European Commission. 1999. Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Off. J. L 203, 03/08/1999.
21. Gibson, S. W., B. O. Hughes, S. Harvey, and P. Dun. 1986. Plasma concentrations of corticosterone and thyroid hormones in laying fowls from different housing systems. Br. Poult. Sci. 27:621-627.
22. Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins. 1992. Skeletal damage and bone defects during catching and processing. Pages 313-328 in Bone Biology and Skeletal Disorders in Poultry. C. C. Whitehead, ed. Carfax, Abingdon, UK.
23. Guesdon, V., A. M. H. Ahmed, S. Mallet, J. M. Faure, and Y. Nys. 2006. Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 47:12-23.
24. Guesdon, V., and J. M. Faure. 2004. Laying performances and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Anim. Res. 53:45-57.
25. Heckert, R. A., I. Estevez, E. Russek-Cohen, and R. Pettit-Riley. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:451-457.
26. Hester, P. Y., W. M. Muir, and J. V. Craig. 1996. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: Production traits during heat and cold exposures. Poult. Sci. 75:315-320.
27. Holder, D. P., and M. V. Bradford. 1979. Relationship of specific gravity of chicken eggs to number of cracked eggs observed and percent shell. Poult. Sci. 58:250-251.
28. Houwen, B. 2000. Blood film preparation and staining procedures. Lab. Hematol. 6:1-7.
29. Hughes, B. O., and M. C. Appleby. 1989. Increase in bone strength of spent laying hens housed in modified cages with perches. Vet. Rec. 124:483-484.
30. Hughes, B. O., and I. J. H. Duncan. 1972. The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. Br. Poult. Sci. 13:525-547.
31. Institut de Selection Animale, B. V. 2007. Shaver White variety general management guide 2007. http://www.hendrix-genetics.com/ Accessed Aug. 2007.
32. Keeling, L., and J. Svedberg. 1999. Legislation banning conventional battery cages in Sweden and subsequent phase-out programme. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
33. Knowles, T. G., and D. M. Broom. 1990. Limb bone strength and movement in laying hens from different housing systems. Vet. Rec. 126:354-356.
34. Koelkebeck, K. W., M. S. Amoss, and J. R. Cain. 1987. Production, physiological and behavioral responses of laying hens in different management environments. Poult. Sci. 66:397-407.
35. Koelkebeck, K. W., and J. R. Cain. 1984. Performance, behaviour, plasma corticosterone, and economic returns of laying hens in several management alternatives. Poult. Sci. 63:2123-2129.
36. Luh Huang, C.-Y., and E. E. Schulte. 1985. Digestion of plant tissue for analysis by ICP emission spectrometry. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16:943-958.
37. Mashaly, M. M., L. Webb, S. L. Youtz, W. B. Roush, and H. B. Graves. 1984. Changes in serum corticosterone concentration of laying hens as a response to increased population density. Poult. Sci. 63:2271-2274.
38. McFarlane, J. M., and S. E. Curtis. 1989. Multiple concurrent stressors in chicks. Effects of plasma corticosterone and the heterophil:lymphocyte ratio. Poult. Sci. 68:522-527.
39. Newberry, R. C., B. A. Webster, N. J. Lewis, and C. Van Arnam. 1999. Management of spent hens. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2:13-29.
40. Newman, S., and S. Leeson. 1998. Effect of housing birds in cages or an aviary system on bone characteristics. Poult. Sci. 77:1492-1496.
41. Nicol, C. J. 1987. Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Anim. Behav. 35:1709-1719.
42. Onbasilar, E. E., and F. T. Aksoy. 2005. Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 95:255-263.
43. Patterson, P. H., and H. S. Siegel. 1998. Impact of cage density on pullet performance and blood parameters of stress. Poult. Sci. 77:32-40.
44. Peguri, A., and C. Coon. 1993. Effect of feather coverage and tem- perature on layer performance. Poult. Sci. 72:1318-1329.
45. Preisinger, R. 2000. Lohmann Tradition, Praxiserfahrung und Ent- wicklungsperspektiven. Lohmann Inform. 3:13-16.
46. SAS. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
47. Savory, C. J. 2004. Laying hen welfare standards: A classic case of "power to the people". Anim. Welf. 13:S153-S158.
48. Silverin, B. 1998. Stress response in birds. Poult. Avian Biol. Rev. 9:153-168.
49. Smith, S. F., M. C. Appleby, and B. O. Hughes. 1993. Nesting and dustbathing by hens in cages: Matching and mis-matching be- tween behaviour and environment. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:21-33.
50. Tanaka, T., and J. F. Hurnik. 1992. Comparison of behaviour and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary. Poult. Sci. 71:235-243.
51. Tauson, R. 1984. Plumage conditions in SCWL laying hens kept in conventional cages of different designs. Acta Agric. Scand. 34:221-230.
52. Tauson, R. 2003. Experience of production and welfare in small group cage in Sweden. Vol. 3 and pages 217-229 in Proceedings of 16th European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and 10th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, Saint-Brieuc, France. World's Poultry Science Associa-tion, French Branch, Nouzilly, France.
53. Tauson, R., and P. Abrahamsson. 1995. Production and health in light white and medium brown hens in modified and conventional cages. Pages 57-64 in Future Egg Production in Sweden. International seminar on prospects for alternatives to conventional cage keeping of egg laying hens in larger scale in Sweden. Kronägg, Kungsangen, Sweden.
54. Tauson, R., T. Ambrosen, and K. Elwinger. 1984. Evaluation of procedures for scoring the integument of laying hens - Independent scoring of plumage condition. Acta Agric. Scand. 34:400-408.
55. Tauson, R., and S. A. Svensson. 1980. Influence of plumage condition on the hen's feed requirement. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 10:35-39.
56. Tauson, R., A. Wahlstrom, and P. Abrahamsson. 1999. Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:152-159.
57. USDA. 2005. Chickens and eggs. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/poultry/pec-bb/2005/ckeg0105.pdf. Accessed June 2007.
58. Wall, H., R. Tauson, and K. Elwinger. 2002. Effect of design, passages, and hybrid on use of nest and production of layers in furnished cages. Poult. Sci. 81:333-339.
59. Weber, R. M., M. Nogossek, I. Sander, B. Wandt, U. Neumann, and G. Glunder. 2003. Investigations of laying hen health in enriched cages as compared to conventional cages and a floor pen system. Wien. Tierarztl. Monatsschr. 90:257-266.
60. Webster, A. B. 2004. Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poult. Sci. 83:184-192.
61. Weitzenbürger, D., A. Vits, H. Hamann, and O. Distl. 2005. Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. Br. Poult. Sci. 46:553-559.
62. Witlin, B. 1967. Detection of antibodies by microtitration techniques. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 33:214-257.