Modality effects in sentence recall

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 205-224

  Goolkasian, Paula ^a   Foos, Paul ^a   Eaton, Mirrenda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory memory recall; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; READING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SERIAL LEARNING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 65549111305     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GENP.136.2.205-224     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cowan, J. N., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., & Moreno, M. V. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 153-177.
2. Foos, P. W., & Goolkasian, P. (2005). Presentation format effects in working memory: The role of attention. Memory & Cognition, 33, 499-513.
3. Frick, R. W. (1985). Testing visual short term memory: Simultaneous versus sequential presentations. Memory & Cognition, 13, 346-356.
4. Goolkasian, P., & Foos, P. W. (2002). Presentation format and its effect on working memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1096-1105.
5. Greene, R. L. (1985). Constraints on the long-term modality effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 526-541.
6. Greene, R. L., Elliott, C. L., & Smith, M. D. (1988). When do interleaved suffixes improve recall? Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 560-571.
7. Kahneman, D., & Henik, A. (1977). Effects of visual grouping on immediate recall and selective attention. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 307-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Lechelt, E. C. (1975). Temporal numerosity discrimination: Intermodal comparisons revisited. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 101-108.
9. Lee, M., & Williams, J. N. (1997). Why is short-term sentence recall verbatim? An evaluation of the role of lexical priming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 156-172.
10. Macromedia. (2001). Sound Edit 16 (Version 2.0) [Computer Software]. San Jose, CA: Adobe Systems Incorporated.
11. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251-269.
12. Penney, C. G. (1975). Modality effects in short-term verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 68-84.
13. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398-422.
14. Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633-654.
15. Rummer, R., & Engelkamp, J. (2001). Phonological information contributes to short-term recall of auditorily presented sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 451-467.
16. Rummer, R., & Schweppe, J. (2005). Evidence for a modality effect in sentence retention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1094-1099.
17. Sherrick, C. E., & Cholewiak, R. W. (1986). Cutaneous sensitivity. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 1, Sensory processes and perception (pp. 1-12, 58). New York: Wiley.