Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 319-331

  Gordon, Karen A ^a   Papsin, Blake C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Age; Behavioral outcomes; Deafness hearing loss auditory deprivation; Duration of deafness; Human; Speech perception; Unilateral and binaural hearing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOISE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; AGE; AUDIOMETRY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMPLANTATION; INFANT; MALE; ONSET AGE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGE OF ONSET; AUDIOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COHORT STUDIES; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; NOISE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 65549108316     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819a8f4c     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Bilateral cochlear implants should be the standard for children with bilateral sensorineural deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;16:69-74.
2. Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Papsin BC. Atypical cortical responses underlie poor speech perception in children using cochlear implants. Neuroreport 16:2041-5.
3. Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DDE, et al. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:2347-62.
4. Sharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005;203:134-43.
5. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children. Hear Res 2005;204:78-89.
6. Lee DS, Lee JS, Oh SH, et al. Deafness: cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature 2001;409:149-50.
7. Lee HJ, Giraud AL, Kang E, et al. Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:909-17.
8. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2003;24:485-500.
9. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11:7-23.
10. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118: 1671-84.
11. Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, et al. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear 2006;27:628-44.
12. Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 2005;46:252-61.
13. Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:224-33.
14. Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, et al. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1462-9.
15. Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold S. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1999;109:595-9.
16. Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, et al. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:649-57.
17. Vollmer M, Leake PA, Beitel RE, et al. Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:3339-55.
18. Raggio MW, Schreiner CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2003;89:3190-204.
19. Moore CM, Vollmer M, Leake PA, et al. The effects of chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on inferior colliculus spatial representation in adult deafened cats. Hear Res 2002;164:82-96.
20. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ. Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 2001;6:363-80.
21. Kral A, Tillein J, Heid S, et al. Cochlear implants: cortical plasticity in congenital deprivation. Prog Brain Res 2006;157:283-313.
22. Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JK. Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants. Science 2005;310: 1490-2.
23. Dettman SJ, Pinder D, Briggs RJ, et al. Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant younger than 12 months: risks versus benefits. Ear Hear 2007;28: 11S-8S.
24. Geers AE. Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64:50-65.
25. Nordeen KW, Killackey HP, Kitzes LM. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J Comp Neurol 1983;214: 144-53.
26. Silverman MS, Clopton BM. Plasticity of binaural interaction: I. Effect of early auditory deprivation. J Neurophysiol 1977;40: 1266-74.
27. Illing RB, Cao QL, Forster CR, et al. Auditory brainstem: development and plasticity of GAP-43 mRNA expression in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1999;412:353-72.
28. Kotak VC, Sanes DH. Developmental influence of glycinergic transmission: regulation of NMDA receptorYmediated EPSPs. J Neurosci 1996;16:1836-43.
29. Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK, Ret J, et al. Cortical reorganization in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Neuroreport 2005;16:463-7.
30. Khosla D, Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, et al. Differential ear effects of profound unilateral deafness on the adult human central auditory system. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2003;4:235-49.
31. Ponton CW, Vasama JP, Tremblay K, et al. Plasticity in the adult human central auditory system: evidence from late-onset profound unilateral deafness. Hear Res 2001;154:32-44.
32. Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar SP. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol 2006;45 Suppl:78-91.
33. Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear 2006;27:43-59.
34. Litovsky R, Johnstone P, Parkinson A, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in children. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273:451-4.
35. Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, et al. 1-Year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:589-96.
36. Scherf F, van Deun L, van Wieringen A, et al. Hearing benefits of second-side cochlear implantation in two groups of children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:1855-63.
37. Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:470-82.
38. Vermeire K, Brokx JP, Van de Heyning PH, et al. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:67-70.
39. Zeitler DM, Kessler MA, Terushkin V, et al. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: a retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:314-25.
40. Mok M, Galvin KL, Dowell RC, et al. Spatial unmasking and binaural advantage for children with normal hearing, a cochlear implant and a hearing aid, and bilateral implants. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12:295-306.
41. Galvin KL, Mok M, Dowell RC, et al. 12-Month post-operative results for older children using sequential bilateral implants. Ear Hear 2007;28:19S-21S.
42. Kuhn-Inacker H, Shehata-Dieler W, Muller J, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:1257-66.
43. Beijen JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA. Sound localization ability of young children with bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:479-85.
44. Grieco-Calub TM, Litovsky RY, Werner LA. Using the observer-based psychophysical procedure to assess localization acuity in toddlers who use bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:235-9.
45. Baumgartner WD, Jappel A, Frei K, et al. Bilateral cochlear implantation-9-year results. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273:459-61.
46. Litovsky RY, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in adults and children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:648-55.
47. Dowell RC, Dettman SJ, Hill K, et al. Speech perception outcomes in older children who use multichannel cochlear implants: older is not always poorer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002;189:97-101.
48. Gordon K, Valero J, Papsin BC. Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants. Neuroreport 2007;18:613-8.
49. Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BC. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use. Hear Res 2007;233:97-107.
50. Gordon KA, Valero J, van Hoesel R, et al. Abnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in children. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:193-8.