State diagrams for harmonically trapped bosons in optical lattices

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Rigol, Marcos ^a   Batrouni, George G ^b   Rousseau, Valery G ^c   Scalettar, Richard T ^d  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL POINTS; CRITICAL VALUES; FILLING-IN; HARMONIC TRAPS; HOMOGENEOUS SYSTEMS; INHOMOGENEOUS DENSITIES; INSULATING DOMAINS; LOCAL COMPRESSIBILITIES; LOCAL QUANTITIES; LOCAL-DENSITY APPROXIMATIONS; ONE DIMENSIONS; OPTICAL LATTICES; QUANTUM FLUCTUATIONS; QUANTUM MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; STATE DIAGRAMS; TWO DIMENSIONS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL; ZERO TEMPERATURES;

BIOELECTRIC PHENOMENA; CRYSTAL LATTICES; EQUATIONS OF STATE; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTICAL MATERIALS; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS;

BOSONS;

EID: 65549098842     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053605     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885
2. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002). 10.1038/415039a (Pubitemid 34062442)
3. I. B. Spielman, W. D. Phillips, and J. V. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 080404 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.080404
4. I. B. Spielman, W. D. Phillips, and J. V. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120402 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.120402
5. T. Stöferle, H. Moritz, C. Schori, M. Köhl, and T. Esslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130403 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.130403
6. G. G. Batrouni, V. Rousseau, R. T. Scalettar, M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, P. J. H. Denteneer, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117203 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.117203
7. V. A. Kashurnikov, N. V. Prokof'ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. A 66, 031601 (R) (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.031601
8. B. DeMarco, C. Lannert, S. Vishveshwara, and T.-C. Wei, Phys. Rev. A 71, 063601 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.063601
9. G. Pupillo, C. J. Williams, and N. V. Prokof'ev, Phys. Rev. A 73, 013408 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.013408 (Pubitemid 43270177)
10. T.-L. Ho and Q. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120404 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120404 (Pubitemid 47443740)
11. F. Gerbier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120405 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99. 120405 (Pubitemid 47443739)
12. M. P. A. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.546
13. G. G. Batrouni, R. T. Scalettar, and G. T. Zimanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1765 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1765
14. J. K. Freericks and H. Monien, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2691 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.2691
15. T. D. Kühner and H. Monien, Phys. Rev. B 58, R14741 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R14741
16. B. Capogrosso-Sansone, S. G. Söyler, N. Prokof'ev, and B. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. A 77, 015602 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.015602
17. D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3108
18. C. Kollath, U. Schollwöck, J. von Delft, and W. Zwerger, Phys. Rev. A 69, 031601 (R) (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.031601
19. S. Wessel, F. Alet, M. Troyer, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. A 70, 053615 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.053615
20. Where each state can, in general, be composed by superfluid and insulating domains with different densities.
21. M. Rigol, A. Muramatsu, G. G. Batrouni, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 130403 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.130403
22. M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 053612 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.053612
23. M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Opt. Commun. 243, 33 (2004). 10.1016/j.optcom.2004.10.040
24. For homogeneous systems, the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian in one dimension can be exactly solved by Bethe ansatz. This, in combination with the LDA, has allowed different groups reproduce (up to small differences at the state boundaries) and extend the QMC state diagram under a harmonic confinement.
25. G. Xianlong, M. Polini, M. P. Tosi, V. L. Campo, Jr., K. Capelle, and M. Rigol, Phys. Rev. B 73, 165120 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.165120
26. X.-J. Liu, P. D. Drummond, and H. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 136406 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.136406
27. V. L. Campo, Jr. and K. Capelle, Phys. Rev. A 72, 061602 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.061602 (Pubitemid 43272763)
28. H. Heiselberg, Phys. Rev. A 74, 033608 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.033608 (Pubitemid 44396671)
29. M. Rigol and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. A 70, 043627 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.043627
30. G. G. Batrouni, H. R. Krishnamurthy, K. W. Mahmud, V. G. Rousseau, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023627 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.023627
31. L. De Leo, C. Kollath, A. Georges, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210403 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.210403
32. F. Gerbier, A. Widera, S. Fölling, O. Mandel, T. Gericke, and I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050404 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.050404
33. P. Sengupta, M. Rigol, G. G. Batrouni, P. J. H. Denteneer, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 220402 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.220402
34. M. Rigol, R. T. Scalettar, P. Sengupta, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. B 73, 121103 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.121103
35. C. Kollath, A. Iucci, T. Giamarchi, W. Hofstetter, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050402 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97. 050402 (Pubitemid 44156706)
36. T.-L. Dao, A. Georges, J. Dalibard, C. Salomon, and I. Carusotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 240402 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.240402 (Pubitemid 47139861)
37. T. Roscilde, New J. Phys. 11, 023019 (2009). 10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/ 023019
38. D. Delande and J. Zakrzewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 085301 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.085301
39. J. E. Hirsch, R. L. Sugar, D. J. Scalapino, and R. Blankenbecler, Phys. Rev. B 26, 5033 (1982). 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.5033
40. R. Jördens, N. Strohmaier, K. Günter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, Nature (London) 455, 204 (2008). 10.1038/nature07244
41. In the thermodynamic limit, based on LDA, one would expect this boundary to occur at constant U/t starting from the tip in the boundary of state II.
42. We thank J. V. Porto and I. B. Spielman for providing us with their results for these quantities.
43. V. G. Rousseau, Phys. Rev. E 77, 056705 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.056705
44. V. G. Rousseau, Phys. Rev. E 78, 056707 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78. 056707