Laboratory investigations on continuous bio-methanization of energy crops as mono-substrate without supplementation

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 33, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 988-993

  Demirel, Burak ^a,b  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Beet silage; Beta vulgaris; Biogas; Energy crops; Fuzzy logic; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

BEET SILAGE; BETA VULGARIS; BIOGAS DIGESTERS; BIOGAS PRODUCTIONS; BUFFERING CAPACITIES; ENERGY CROPS; FUZZY-LOGIC CONTROLS; GAS PRODUCTIONS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS; LABORATORY-SCALE; MESOPHILIC; NEUTRAL PH; ON-LINE MONITORING; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; REDOX POTENTIALS; RENEWABLE ENERGY;

BIOGAS; CROPS; FUZZY CONTROL; FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY SETS; GAS PIPELINES; GAS PRODUCERS; MANURES; METHANE; RADAR ANTENNAS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SUBSTRATES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; ENERGY CROP; GAS PRODUCTION; LABORATORY METHOD; METHANOGENESIS; PH; REDOX POTENTIAL; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SILAGE;

BETA VULGARIS; BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 65549093593     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Chynoweth D. Environmental impact of biomethanogenesis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42 (1996) 3-18
2. Weiland P. One- and two-step anaerobic digestion of solid agroindustrial wastes. Water Science and Technology 27 2 (1993) 145-151
3. Tafdrup S. Centralized biogas plants combine agricultural and environmental benefits with energy production. Water Science and Technology 30 12 (1994) 133-141
4. Maeng H., Lund H., and Hvelplund F. Biogas plants in Denmark: technological and economic developments. Applied Energy 64 (1999) 195-206
5. Weiland P. Anaerobic waste digestion in Germany-status and recent developments. Biodegradation 11 (2000) 415-421
6. Weiland P. Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 109 (2003) 263-274
7. Angelidaki I., and Ellegaard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 109 (2003) 95-105
8. Murphy J.D., and McCarthy K. The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland. Renewable Energy 30 (2005) 2111-2127
9. Svensson L.M., Christensson K., and Björnsson L. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level: is it economically feasible under conditions in Sweden?. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 28 (2005) 139-148
10. Weiland P. Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Engineering in Life Sciences 6 3 (2006) 302-309
11. Raven R.P.M.J., and Gregersen K.H. Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (2007) 116-132
12. Ward A., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., and Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 7928-7940
13. Lansing S., Botero R.B., and Martin J.F. Waste treatment and biogas quality in small-scale agricultural digesters. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 5881-5890
14. Walla C., and Schneeberger W. The optimal size for biogas plants. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 551-557
15. Lindorfer H., Waltenberger R., Köllner K., Braun R., and Kirchmayr R. New data on temperature optimum and temperature changes in energy crops digesters. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 7011-7019
16. Lindorfer H., Corcoba A., Vasilieva V., Braun R., and Kirchmayr R. Doubling the organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and manure - a full scale case study. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 1148-1156
17. Lindorfer H., Lopez C.P., Resch C., Braun R., and Kirchmayr R. The impact of increasing energy crop addition on process performance and residual methane potential in anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology 56 10 (2008) 55-63
18. Chae K.J., Jang A., Yim S.K., and Kim I.S. The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 1-6
19. Feng C., Shimada S., Zhang Z., and Maekawa T. A pilot plant two-phase anaerobic digestion system for bioenergy recovery from swine wastes and garbage. Waste Management 28 (2008) 1827-1834
20. Lehtomaki A., Huttunen S., Lehtinen T.M., and Rintala J.A. Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 3267-3278
21. Pakarinen O., Lehtomaki A., Rissanen S., and Rintala J. Storing energy crops for methane production: effects of solids content and biological additive. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 7074-7082
22. Rastogi G., Ranade D.R., Yeole T.Y., Patole M.S., and Shouche Y.S. Investigation of methanogen population structure in biogas reactor by molecular characterization of methyl-coenzyme M reductase A (mcr A) genes. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 5317-5326
23. Schievano A., Pognani M., D'Imporzano G., and Adani F. Predicting anaerobic biogasification potential of ingestates and digestates of a full-scale biogas plant using chemical and biological parameters. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 8112-8117
24. 2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 2620-2627
25. Wiese J., and Kujawski O. Operational results of an agricultural biogas plant equipped with modern instrumentation and automation. Water Science and Technology 57 6 (2008) 803-808
26. Resch C., Braun R., and Kirchmayr R. The influence of energy crop substrates on the mass-flow analysis and the residual methane potential at a rural anaerobic digestion plant. Water Science and Technology 57 1 (2008) 73-81
27. Parawira W., Read J.S., Mattiasson B., and Bjornsson L. Energy production from agricultural residues: high methane yields in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 1 (2008) 44-50
28. Wichern M., Lubken M., Schlattmann M., Gronauer A., and Horn H. Investigations and mathematical simulation on decentralized anaerobic treatment of agricultural substrate from livestock farming. Water Science and Technology 58 1 (2008) 67-72
29. Kusch S., Oechsner H., and Jungbluth T. Biogas production with horse dung in solid-phase digestion systems. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 1280-1292
30. Macias-Corral M., Samani Z., Hanson A., Smith G., Funk P., Yu H., et al. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste and agricultural waste and the effect of co-digestion with dairy cow manure. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 8288-8293
31. Alvarez R., and Liden G. The effect of temperature variation on biomethanation at high altitude. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 7278-7284
32. Chanakya H.N., Reddy B.V.V., and Modak J. Biomethanation of herbaceous biomass residues using 3-zone plug flow like digesters - a case study from India. Renewable Energy 34 2 (2009) 416-420
33. Scherer P.A., Dobler S., Rohardt S., Loock R., Buttner B., Noldeke P., et al. Continuous biogas production from fodder beet silage as sole substrate. Water Science and Technology 48 (2003) 229-233
34. Klocke M., Mähnert P., Mundt K., Souidi K., and Linke B. Microbial community analysis of a biogas-producing completely stirred tank reactor fed continuously with fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 30 (2007) 139-151
35. Demirel B., and Scherer P. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 203-209
36. Demirel B., Neumann L., and Scherer P. Microbial community dynamics of a continuous mesophilic anaerobic biogas digester fed with sugar beet silage. Engineering in Life Sciences 8 4 (2008) 390-398
37. Müller A., Marsili-Libelli S., Aivasidis A., Lloyd T., Kroner S., and Wandrey C. Fuzzy control of disturbances in a wastewater treatment process. Water Research 12 (1997) 3157-3167
38. Murnleitner E., Becker T.M., and Delgado A. State detection and control of overloads in the anaerobic wastewater treatment using fuzzy logic. Water Research 36 (2002) 201-211
39. Chen W.C., Chang N.B., and Chen J.C. Rough set-based hybrid fuzzy-neural controller design for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Research 37 (2003) 95-107
40. Boscolo A., Mangiavacchi C., Drius F., Rongione F., Pavan P., and Cecchi F. Fuzzy control of an anaerobic digester for the treatment of the organic fraction of the MSW. Water Science and Technology 27 (1993) 57-68
41. Domnanovich A.M., Strik D.P., Zani L., Pfeiffer B., Karlovits M., Braun R., et al. A fuzzy logic approach to control anaerobic digestion. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 68 (2003) 215-218
42. Scherer P.A., Lehmann K., Schmidt O., and Demirel B. Application of a fuzzy logic control system for continuous anaerobic digestion of low buffered, acidic energy crops as mono-substrate. Biotechnology & Bioengineering 102 (2009) 736-748
43. DIN 38414-8. German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge; sludge and sediments (group S); determination of the amenability to anaerobic digestion (S8), 1985.
44. APHA/AWWA/WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. (1989), American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC
45. Ahring B.K. Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 67 (1995) 91-102
46. Ahring B.K., Ibrahim A.A., and Mladenovska Z. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65 °C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Research 35 10 (2001) 2446-2452
47. Karakashev D., Batstone D.J., and Angelidaki I. Influence of environmental conditions on methanogenic compositions in anaerobic biogas reactors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71 1 (2005) 331-338
48. Lehtomaki A., Huttunen S., and Rintala J.A. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resources Conservation and Recycling 51 (2007) 591-609
49. Bombardiere J., Espinosa-Solares T., Domaschko M., and Chatfield M. Thermophilic anaerobic digester performance under different feed-loading frequency. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 136-140 (2007) 765-775
50. Braun R., Huper P., and Meyrath J. Ammonia toxicity in liquid piggery manure digestion. Biotechnology Letters 3 4 (1981) 159-164
51. Angelidaki I., and Ahring B.K. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38 (1993) 560-564
52. Gallert C., and Winter J. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source sorted organic wastes: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 48 (1997) 405-410
53. Hansen K.H., Angelidaki I., and Ahring B. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia. Water Research 32 (1998) 5-12
54. Nielsen H.B., and Angelidaki I. Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition. Bioresource Technology 99 17 (2008) 7995-8001