High-dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis

Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 301-337

  Chowdhury, Rajib ^a   Rao, B N ^a   Prasad, A Meher ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Failure probability; High dimensional model representation; Moving least squares; Response surface; Structural reliability

Indexed keywords

FAILURE PROBABILITY; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION; MOVING LEAST SQUARES; RESPONSE SURFACE; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CURVE FITTING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RAILROAD PLANT AND STRUCTURES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 65549092326     PISSN: 10698299     EISSN: 10990887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1118     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC. Methods of Structural Safety. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
2. Breitung K. Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1984; 110(3):357-366.
3. Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO. Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley: Chichester, 1996.
4. Rackwitz R. Reliability analysis - a review and some perspectives. Structural Safety 2001; 23(4):365-395.
5. Liu PL, Der Kiureghian A. Finite element reliability of geometrically nonlinear uncertain structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1991; 117(8):1806-1825.
6. Bjerager P. Probability integration by directional simulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1988; 114(8):285-1302.
7. Der Kiureghian A, Dakessian T. Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability. Structural Safety 1998; 20(1):37-49.
8. Rubinstein RY. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. Wiley: New York, 1981.
9. Melchers RE. Importance sampling in structural systems. Structural Safety 1989; 6(1):3-10.
10. Au SK, Beck JL. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2001; 16(4):263-277.
11. Schuëller GI, Pradlwarter HW, Koutsourelakis PS. A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2004; 19(4):463-474.
12. Rabitz H, Alis OF, Shorter J, Shim K. Efficient input-output model representations. Computer Physics Communications 1999; 117(1-2):11-20.
13. Rabitz H, Alis OF. General foundations of high dimensional model representations. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 1999; 25(2-3):197-233.
14. Alis OF, Rabitz H. Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 2001; 29(2):127-142.
15. Li G, Rosenthal C, Rabitz H. High dimensional model representations. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2001; 105:7765-7777.
16. Li G, Wang SW, Rabitz H. High dimensional model representations generated from low dimensional data samples - I. mp-Cut-HDMR. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 2001; 30(1):1-30.
17. Wang SW, Levy II H, Li G, Rabitz H. Fully equivalent operational models for atmospheric chemical kinetics within global chemistry-transport models. Journal of Geophysical Research 1999; 104(D23):30417-30426.
18. Li G, Wang SW, Rabitz H, Wang S, Jaffé P. Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations (HDMR). Chemical Engineering Science 2002; 57(21):4445-4460.
19. Sobol IM. Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representations. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2003; 79(2):187-193.
20. Chowdhury R, Rao BN, Prasad AM. High dimensional model representation for piece wise continuous function approximation. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1053.
21. Sobol IM. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1993; 1:407-414.
22. Lancaster P, Salkauskas K. Curve and Surface Fitting: An Introduction. Academic Press: London, 1986.
23. Singh IV. A numerical solution of composite heat transfer problems using meshless method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2004; 47:2123-2138.
24. Rao BN, Rahman S. An efficient meshless method for fracture analysis of cracks. Computational Mechanics 2000; 26:398-408.
25. Kim SH, Na SW. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Structural Safety 1997; 19(1):3-19.
26. Gayton N, Bourinet JM, Lemaire M. CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2003; 25(1):99-121.
27. Gavin HP, Yau SC. High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.10.003.
28. Breitung K, Faravelli L. Log-likelihood maximization and response surface in reliability assessment. Nonlinear Dynamics 1994; 5(3):273-285.
29. Ditlevsen O. Uncertainty Modeling. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 1981.
30. Zhou J, Nowak AS. Integration formulas to evaluate functions of random variables. Structural Safety 1988; 5(4):267-284.
31. Penmetsa RC, Grandhi RV. Efficient estimation of structural reliability for problems with uncertain intervals. Computers and Structures 2002; 80:1103-1112.
32. ADINA R&D, Inc. ADINA theory and modeling guide. Report ARD 05-6, ADINA R&D, Inc., 2005.
33. Wen YK. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1976; 102(EM2):249-263.
34. Liu PL, Der Kiureghian A. Optimization algorithms for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety 1991; 9(3):161-177.
35. Bucher CG, Bourgund U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problem. Structural Safety 1990; 7(1):57-66.
36. Guan XL, Melchers RE. Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates. Structural Safety 2001; 23(4):429-444.