The use of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (Tics-M) in the detection of amnestic mild cognitive impairment

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 103-109

  Cook, Sarah E ^a,c   Marsiske, Michael ^a   McCoy, Karin J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c Department of Clinical and Health Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Mild cognitive impairment; ROC analysis; Telephone assessment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PATIENT CODING; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; AGED; AMNESIA; COGNITION DISORDERS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MASS SCREENING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; REMOTE CONSULTATION; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 65549084366     PISSN: 08919887     EISSN: 15525708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0891988708328214     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Welsh KA, Breitner JCS, Magruder-Habib KM Detection of dementia in the elderly using Telephone Screening of Cognitive Status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1993 ; 6: 103-110. (Pubitemid 23112862)
2. Graff-Radford NR, Ferman TJ, Lucas JA, et al. A cost effective method of identifying and recruiting persons over 80 free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 ; 20: 101-104. (Pubitemid 44305909)
3. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR ''Mini-Mental State'': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 ; 12: 189-198.
4. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.; 1988.
5. Brandt J., Spencer M., Folstein M. The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1988 ; 1: 111-117. (Pubitemid 20164001)
6. Petersen RC, Doody R., Kurz A., et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2001 ; 58: 1985-1992. (Pubitemid 33143977)
7. Petersen RC Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. 2004 ; 256: 183-194. (Pubitemid 39222988)
8. Morris JC The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993 ; 43: 2412-2414. (Pubitemid 23346995)
9. Lines CR, McCarroll KA, Lipton RB, Block GA, and Prevention of Alzheimer's In Society's Elderly Study Group. Telephone screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2003 ; 60: 261-266. (Pubitemid 36152019)
10. McCoy KJM. Understanding the transition from normal cognitive aging to mild cognitive impairment: comparing the intraindividual variability in cognitive function. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida ; 2004.
11. Cook SE, Marsiske M. Subjective memory beliefs and cognitive performance in normal and mildly impaired older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2006 ; 10: 413-423. (Pubitemid 43977376)
12. de Jager CA, Budge MM, Clarke R. Utility of TICS-M for the assessment of cognitive function in older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 ; 18: 318-324. (Pubitemid 36503043)
13. Plassman BL, Newman TT, Welsh KA, Helms M., Breitner J.C.S. Properties of the telephone interview for cognitive status: Application in epidemiological and longitudinal studies. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1994 ; 7: 235-241. (Pubitemid 24268947)
14. Gallo JJ, Breitner JCS. Alzheimer's disease in the NAS-NRC Registry of ageing twin veterans, IV. Performance characteristics of the two-stage telephone screening procedure for Alzheimer's dementia. Psychol Med. 1995 ; 25: 1211-1220.
15. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999 ; 56: 303-308. (Pubitemid 29120227)
16. Morris JC, McKeel DW, Fulling K., Torack RM, Berg L. Validation of clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's Disease. Ann Neurol. 1988 ; 24: 17-22. (Pubitemid 18171370)
17. Brandt J., Benedict RHB. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources ; 2001.
18. Wilson B., Cockburn J., Baddeley A. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Bury St. Edmunds, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1985.
19. Benedict RHB. Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. ; 1997.
20. Blair JR, Spreen O. Predicting pre-morbid IQ: a revision of the National Adult Reading Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 1989 ; 3: 129-136.
21. Kaplan EF, Goodglass H., Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott ; 2001.
22. Benton A., Hamsher K. Multilingual Apahsia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates ; 1989.
23. Reitan RM Trail Making Test: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Lab; 1992.
24. Willis SL, Marsiske M. Manual for the Everyday Problems Test. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University ; 1993.
25. Yesavage JA Development and validation of a Geriatric Depression Screening Scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983 ; 17: 37-49.
26. Radloff LS The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977 ; 1: 385-401.
27. Gilewski MJ, Zelinski EM, Schaie KW The memory functioning questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age. Psychol Aging. 1990 ; 5: 482-490.
28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS Using Multivariate Statistics. 5 th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon ; 2007.
29. Murphy JM, Berwick DM, Weinstein MC, Borus JF, Budman SH, Klerman GL Performance of screening and diagnostic tests: application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 ; 22: 550-555. (Pubitemid 17082096)
30. Pachana NA, Alpass FM, Blakey JA, Long NR A comparison of the MMSE and the TICS-m in hearing-impaired older adults. Aust J Ageing. 2006 ; 25: 89-93.
31. Heinik J., Solomesh I. Validity of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination-Revised new executive function scores in the diagnosis of dementia: some early findings. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2007 ; 20: 22-28. (Pubitemid 46233615)
32. Herzog AR, Wallace RB Measures of cognitive functioning in the AHEAD study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 ; 52B: 37-48. (Pubitemid 27281898)
33. Langa KM, Plassman BL, Wallace RB, et al. The aging, demographics, and memory study: Study design and methods. Neuroepidemiology. 2005 ; 25: 181-191. (Pubitemid 41540659)
34. Buschke H., Sliwinski MJ, Kuslansky G., Katz M., Verghese J., Lipton RB Retention weighted recall improves discrimination of Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 ; 12: 436-440. (Pubitemid 43970910)