Providing information to pregnant women: How, what and where?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 116, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 877-879

  Watkins, L ^a   Weeks, A D ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOTE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 65549083855     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02176.x     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999 3 : 1 156. (Pubitemid 29125714)
2. Horey D, Weaver J, Russell H. Information for pregnant women about caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004 1 : CD003858.
3. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. NIH Consens Sci Statements 2006 23 : 1 29.
4. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London : RCOG Press, 2001.
5. Hodnett ED. Caregiver support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002 1 : CD000199.
6. Waldenstrom U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Radestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 2004 31 : 1 27. (Pubitemid 38393439)
7. Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 2007 114 : 86 93.
8. Emmett CL, Shaw AR, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ, DiAMOND study group. Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG 2006 113 : 1438 45.
9. Kingdon C, Neilson J, Singleton V, Gyte G, Hart A, Gabbay M, et al. Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request. BJOG 2009 116 : 886 95.
10. Frost J, Shaw A, Montgomery A, Murphy DJ. Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. BJOG 2009 116 : 896 905.
11. Rees KM, Shaw ARG, Bennert K, Emmett CL, Montgomery AA. Healthcare professionals' views on two computer-based decision aids for women choosing mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: a qualitative study. BJOG 2009 116 : 906 14.
12. Emmett CL, Murphy DJ, Patel RR, Fahey T, Jones C, Ricketts IW, et al. Decision-making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer-based decision aids. Health Expect 2007 10 : 161 72. (Pubitemid 46808891)
13. Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Vail A. A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. Br Med J 1995 311 : 1127 30.
14. Wong SSM, Thornton JG, Gbolade B, Bekker HL. A randomised controlled trial of a decesion aid leaflet to facilitate women's choice between pregnancy termination methods. BJOG 2006 113 : 688 94. (Pubitemid 43781700)