Pooling in high-throughput drug screening

Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 339-350

  Kainkaryam, Raghunandan M ^a   Woolf, Peter J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug discovery; Group testing; HTS; Mixture based screening; Multiplexed screening; Pooling designs

Indexed keywords

DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SCREENING; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SOLID;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC;

EID: 65449189248     PISSN: 13676733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Dove A: Drug screening - Beyond the bottleneck. Nat Biotechnol (1999) 17(9): 859-863.
2. Walters WP, Namchuk M: Designing screens: How to make your hits a hit. Nat Rev Drug Discov (2003) 2(4):259-266.
3. Janzen WP: High Throughput Screening: Methods and Protocols (Methods In Molecular Biology, Volume 190). Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ, USA (2002).
4. Malo N, Hanley JA, Cerquozzl S, Pelletler J, Nadon R: Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis. Nat Biotechnol (2006) 24(2):167-175.
5. Du DZ, Hwang FK: Combinatorial Group Testing and Its Applications. World Scientific Publishing Company, Hackensack, NJ, USA (2000).
6. Bruno WJ, Knill E, Balding DJ, Bruce DC, Doggett NA, Sawhill WW, Stallings RL, Whittaker CC, Torney DC: Efficient pooling designs for library screening. Genomics (1995) 26(1):21-30.
7. Jones MC, Zhigljavsky AA: Comparison of costs for multi-stage group testing methods in the pharmaceutical industry. Commun Stat Theory Methods (2001) 30(10):2189-2209.
8. Eppstein D, Goodrich MT, Hirschberg DS: Improved combinatorial group testing for real-world problem sizes. In: Algorithms and Data Structures (Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Volume 3608). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2005):86-98.
9. Hughes-Oliver J: Pooling experiments for blood screening and drug discovery. In: Screening: Methods for Experimentation In Industry, Drug Discovery, and Genetics. Springer Science+Buslness Media Inc, New York, NY, USA (2006):48-68.
10. De Bonis A, Gasieniec L, Vaccaro U: Optimal two-stage algorithms for group testing problems. SIAM J Comput (2005) 34(5):1253-1270.
11. Bar-Lev SK, Stadje W, Van der Duyn Schouten FA: Group testing procedures with incomplete Identification and unreliable testing results. Appl Stochastic Models Business Industry (2006) 22(3)1281-296.
12. Devlin JJ, Liang A, Trinh L, Polokoff MA, Senator D, Zheng W, Kondracki J, Kretschmer PJ, Morser J, Lipson SE, Spann R et al: High capacity screening of pooled compounds: Identification of the active compound without re-assay of pool members. Drug Dev Res (1996) 37(2):80-85.
13. Motlekar N, Diamond SL, Napper AD: Evaluation of an orthogonal pooling strategy for rapid high-throughput screening of proteases. ASSAY Drug Dev Technologies (2008) 6(3):395-405.
14. Warrior U, Gopalakrishnan, SM, Traphagen L, Freiberg G, Towne D, Humphrey P, Kofron J, Burns DJ: Maximizing the identification of leads from compound mixtures. Lett Drug Des Discovery (2007) 4(3):215-223.
15. Ferrand S, Schmid A, Engeloch C, Gllckman FJ: Statistical evaluation of a self-deconvolutlng matrix strategy for highthroughput screening of the CXCR3 receptor. ASSAY Drug Dev Technologies (2005) 3(4):413-424.
16. Huang T: Pooling spaces and non-adaptive pooling designs. Discrete Math (2004) 282(1-3):163-169.
17. Du D, Hwang F: Pooling Designs and Nonadaptive Group Testing: Important Tools for DNA Sequencing (Series on Applied Mathematics). World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, Singapore (2006).
18. Thierry-Mieg N: A new pooling strategy for high-throughput screening: The Shifted Transversal Design. BMC Bioinform (2006) 7:28.
19. Hwang FK, Liu YC: Random pooling designs under various structures. J Comb Optimization (2003) 7(4): 339-352.
20. Kainkaryam R, Woolf P: poolHiTS: A Shifted Transversal Design based pooling strategy for high-throughput drug screening. BMC Bioinform (2008) 9:256.
21. Porat E, Rothschild A: Explicit non-adaptive combinatorial group testing schemes. In: Automata, Languages and Programming (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 5125). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2008):748-759.
22. Wilson-Lingardo L, Davis PW, Ecker DJ, Hébert N, Acevedo O, Sprankle K, Brennan T, Schwarcz L, Freier SM, Wyatt JR: Deconvolution of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery: Experimental comparison of pooling strategies. J Med Chem (1996) 39(14):2720-2726.
23. Houghten RA, Wilson DB, Pinilla C: Drug discovery and vaccine development using mixture-based synthetic combinatorial libraries. Drug Disc Today (2000) 5(7):276-285.
24. Chung TDY: Screen compounds singly: Why muck it up? J Biomol Screen (1998) 3(3): 171-173.
25. Snider M: Screening of compound libraries... consommé or gumbo? J Biomol Screen (1998) 3(3):169-170.
26. Borisy AA, Elliott PJ, Hurst NW, Lee MS, Lehar J, Price ER, Serbedzija G, Zimmermann GR, Foley MA, Stockwell BR, Keith CT: Systematic discovery of multicomponent therapeutics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100(13):7977-7982.
27. Feng B, Shoichet B: Synergy and antagonism of promiscuous inhibition in multiple-compound mixtures. J Med Chem (2006) 49(7):2151-2154.
28. Hann M, Hudson B, Lewell X, Lifely R, Miller L, Ramsden N: Strategic pooling of compounds for high-throughput screening. J Chem Inf Comput Sci (1999) 39(5):897-902.
29. Remlinger KS, Hughes-Oliver JM, Young SS, Lam RL: Statistical design of pools using optimal coverage and minimal collision. Technometrics (2006) 48(1):133-143.
30. Xle M, Tatsuoka K, Sacks J, Young SS: Group testing with blockers and synergism. J Am Statistical Assoc (2001) 96(453):92-102.
31. Thierry-Mieg N, Bailly G: Interpool: Interpreting smart-pooling results. Bioinformatics (2008) 24(5):696-703.
32. Uehara H, Jimbo M: A positive detecting code and its decoding algorithm for DNA library screening. IEEE-ACM Trans Computational Biol Bioinform (2007) 99(1):5555.