Between devolution and the deep blue sea: What's a city or state to do?

A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 364-398

  Davis, John Emmeus ^a  

^a Community Development LLC ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449173456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Abbot, Carl. 2002. Planning a sustainable city: The promise and performance of Portland's urban growth boundary. In Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences & policy responses, ed. Gregory D. Squires, 207-235. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
2. Apgar, William C. 1991. Preservation of existing housing: A key element in a revitalized national housing policy. Housing Policy Debate, 2(2):187-210.
3. Apgar, William C., and MarkDuda. 2003. The twentyfifth anniversary of the Community Reinvestment Act: Past accomplishments and future regulatory challenges. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 169-191, June.
4. Arigoni, Danielle. 2001. Common ground: Smart growth and affordable housing advocates start a dialogue. Shelterforce, 23:16-18, November/ December.
5. Atlas, John, and Ellen Shoshkes. 1997. Saving affordable housing. Orange, NJ: National Housing Institute.
6. Avault, John, and Geoff Lewis. 2000. Survey of linkage programs in other U.S. cities with comparisons to Boston. Boston: Boston Redevelopment Authority. Axel-Lute, Miriam. 1999. A meeting of movements. Shelterforce, 21(1):10-14.
7. Avault, John, and Geoff Lewis. 2003. Zoning for housing justice. Shelterforce, 25(5):8-11.
8. Bank of America, California Resources Agency, Green belt Alliance, and Low Income Housing Fund. 1995. Beyond sprawl: New patterns of growth to fit the new California, San Francisco.
9. Barr, Kenneth K. 1997. Laws protecting mobile home park residents. LandUse and ZoningDigest, 49:3-7, November.
10. Barr, Kenneth K. 1998. Controlling 'Im' mobile home space rents. In Rent control: Regulation and the rental housing market, eds. W. Dennis Keating, Michael Tertz and Andrejs Skaburskis, 193-203. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.
11. Barton, Stephen E. 1996. Socialhousing versushousing allowances: Choosing between two forms of housing subsidy at the local level. APA Journal 62:108-119.
12. Barton, Stephen E. 1998. The success and failure of strong rent control in the city of Berkeley, 1978 to 1995. In Rent control: Regulation and the rental housing market, eds.W. Dennis Keating, Michael Tertz and Andrejs Skaburskis, 88-109.NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
13. Bauer, Catherine. 1985. The dreary deadlock of public housing. In Federal housing policy and programs: Past and present, ed. J. PaulMitchell, 277-285. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
14. Bodaken, Michael. 2002. The increasing shortage of affordable rental housing inAmerica: Action items for preservation. Housing Facts & Findings, 4(4):1, 4-7.
15. Boger, John Charles. 1997. Mount Laurel at 21 years: Reflections on the power of courts and legislatures to shape social change. Seton Hall Law Review, 27(4):1450-1470.
16. Bradford, Calvin and Gail Cincotta. 1992. The legacy, the promise, and the unfinished agenda. In From redlining to reinvestment, ed. Gregory D. Squires, 228-286. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
17. Bratt, Rachel G. 1989. Rebuilding a low-income housing policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18. Brooks, Mary E. 2002. Housing Trust Fund Progress Report 2002:Local responses toAmerica's housing needs. Washington, DC: Center for Community Change.
19. Brooks, Mary E. 1994. Housing trust funds. In The affordable city: Toward a third sector housing policy, ed. John Emmeus Davis, 245-264. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20. Browning, Rufus, Dale Marshall, and David Tabb. 1984. Protest is not enough. Berkeley: University of California Press. Calavita, Nico, Kenneth Grimes and Alan Mallach. 1997. Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1):109-142.
21. Capek, Stella M., and John I. Gilderbloom. 1992.Community versus commodity:Tenants and theAmerican city. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22. Caraley, Demetrios. 1996. Separating fiction from reality: A case against dismantling and devolving the federal safety net. Working Paper. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
23. Center for Public Integrity. 1999. Hidden agendas: How state legislatures keep conflicts of interest under wraps. Washington, DC: The Center.
24. Chen, David W. 2003. One housing woe gives way to another. New York Times, December 21, Section 1:49.
25. Citizens' Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA). 2001. The homes of 40B: Case studies of affordable housing using the comprehensive permit. Boston: CHAPA.
26. Clavel, Pierre, Jessica Pitt and Jordan Yin. 1997. The community option in urban policy. Urban Affairs Review, 32:435-458, March.
27. Collins, Chuck, and Kirby White. 1994. Boston in the 1980s: Toward a social housing policy. In The affordable city:Toward a third sector housing policy, ed.
28. John Emmeus Davis, 201-225. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29. Colton, Kent W. 2003. Housing in the twentieth-first century: Achieving common ground. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Council on Affordable Housing (COAH). 2005. About COAH. Available on the website of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/coah/about.shtml.
31. Davidoff, Paul. 1978. The redistributive function in planning: Creating greater equity among citizens of communities. In Planning theory in the 1980s, eds. Robert W. Burchell and George Sternlieb, 69-72. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
32. Davis, John Emmeus. 1991. Contested ground: Collective action and the urban neighborhood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33. Davis, John Emmeus. 2000. Homemaking: The pragmatic politics of third sector housing. In Property and values, eds. Charles Geisler and Gail Daneker, 233-258.Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. Davis, John Emmeus. ed. 1994. The affordable city: Toward a third sector housing policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35. Davis, John Emmeus, and Amy Demetrowitz. 2003. Permanently affordable homeownership: Does the community land trust deliver on its promises? Burlington, VT: Burlington Community Land Trust.
36. Davis, John Emmeus, Nancy Wasserman and Jeff Staudinger. 2000. Research into the Small Cities CDBG programs of twenty-two states: Community Development Redesign Report II. Montpelier, VT: Department of Housing and Community Affairs, State of Vermont.
37. Davis, John Emmeus, and Jane Knodell. 1999. Economic benefits of public investment in affordable housing and land conservation: A review of arguments and evidence. Montpelier, VT: Vermont Housing and Conservation Board.
38. Davis, John Emmeus, Tim McKenzie and Diana Carminati. 1993. Designing a home equity living plan forMadison, Wisconsin: A pre-feasibility study. Unpublished report prepared for theMadisonArea Community Land Trust, Independent Living, Inc. and the City of Madison.
39. Dedman, Bill. 1988. The color of money. Atlanta Journal/ Constitution, May 1-16.
40. Dedman, Bill. 1989. Blacks turned down for home loans from S& Ls twice as often as whites. Atlanta Journal/ Constitution, January 22.
41. Dolbeare, Cushing. 2000. Shifting fortunes. Shelterforce, 110:14-15, March/April.
42. Donahue, John D. 1997. The disunited states. The Atlantic Monthly, 279:18-22, May.
43. Downs, Anthony. 1997. The Devolution Revolution: WhyCongress is shifting a lot of power to the wrong levels. BrookingsPolicy BriefNo. 3.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, February 21.
44. Eisinger, Peter. 1998. City politics in an era of federal devolution. Urban Affairs Review, 33(3):308-325.
45. Engler, John. 1997. The liberal rout. Policy Review, 81:44-48, January/February.
46. Etzioni, Amitai. 1995. Devolution is not exactly a household word. Pray that it never will be. USA Today, May 25.
47. Everett, David. 1992. Confrontation, negotiation, and collaboration: Detroit's multi billion dollar agreement. In From redlining to reinvestment, ed. Gregory D. Squires, 109-132. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
48. Fannie Mae Foundation. 2001. State policies are critical to local responses on tax delinquent properties. Housing Facts & Findings, 3(1).
49. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). 1992. A citizen's guide to the CRA. Washington, DC: FFIEC.
50. Gilderbloom, John I., and Richard P. Appelbaum. 1988.Rethinking rental housing. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
51. Goering, John, and Judith D. Feins, eds. 2003. Choosing a better life? Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment.Washington, DC: TheUrban Institute Press.
52. Goetz, Edward G. 1995. Potential effects of federal policy devolution on local housing expenditures. Publius, 25(3):99-116.
53. Goetz, Edward G. 1996. The community-based housing movement and progressive local politics. In Revitalizing urban neighborhoods, eds.W. Dennis Keating, Norman Krumholz and Philip Star, 164-178. Lawrence, KS: The University of Kansas Press.
54. Goetz, Edward G. 2003. Clearing the way: Deconstructing the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
55. Goetz, Edward G., KarenChapple and Barbara Luckermann. 2001. Enabling exclusion: The retreat from fair share housing in the implementation of the Minnesota Land Use PlanningAct. Paperpresented at the annual meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, November 7-11.
56. Gold, Steven G. 1996. Issues raised by the new federalism. National Tax Journal, symposium on the Devolution Revolution, 49(2):273-287.
57. Harmon, Tasha R. 1998. Who pays the price for regional planning? How to link growth management and affordable housing. Planners Network, 128, March/April.
58. Harmon, Tasha R. 1992. Affordable housing: The Vermont model. Amherst: Center for Rural Massachusetts, University of Massachusetts.
59. Hartman, Chester. 1998. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. In The encyclopedia of housing, ed. Willem vanVliet, 599-600. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. Hartman, Chester. 1984. The right to stay put. In Land reform, American style, eds. Charles C. Geisler and Frank J. Popper, 302-318. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
61. Hartman, Chester, and David Robinson. 2003. Evictions: The hidden housing problem. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4):461-501.
62. Hartman, Chester, and Todd Franke. 2003. Student mobility: How some children get left behind. Journal of Negro Education, Vol. 72., No. 1, Winter.
63. Hartman, Chester, Dennis Keating and Richard LeGates. 1982. Displacement: How to fight it. Berkeley, CA: Legal Services Anti-displacement Project.
64. Hayes, R. Allen. 1995. The federal government and urban housing, Second Edition. Albany: StateUniversity of New York Press.
65. Heudorfer, Bonnie. 2003. The record on 40B: The effectiveness of the Massachusetts affordable housing zoning law. Boston:Citizen's Housing and Planning Association.
66. Hite, James C.1979. Room and situation: The political economy of land-use policy. Chicago: Nelson- Hall.
67. Hurd, Maude, and Steven Kest. 2003. Fighting predatory lending from the ground up. In Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and the democratization of financial institutions, ed. Gregory D. Squires, 119-134. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
68. Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS). 1995. The state of the nation's housing 1995. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
69. Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS). 2000. The state of the nation's housing 2000. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
70. Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS). 2003. The state of the nation's housing 2003. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
71. Keating, W. Dennis. 1989. Linkage: Tying downtown development to community housing needs. In Housing issues of the 1990s, eds. Sara Rosenberry and Chester Hartman, 211-222. New York: Praeger.
72. Keating, W. Dennis. 1994. The suburban racial dilemma. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
73. Keating, W. Dennis. 1998. Rent control: Its origins, history, and controversies. In Rent control: Regulation and the rental housing market, ed. W. Dennis Keating, Michael Teitz and Andrejs Skaburskis, 1-14. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research.
74. Keating, W. Dennis. 2003. Comment on Chester Hartman and David Robinson's 'Evictions: The hidden housing problem'. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4):517-528.
75. Krumholz, Norman. 1996. Making a difference with equityplanning. InPlanners on planning, eds. Bruce McClendon and Anthony James Catanese. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
76. Krumholz, Norman. 1997. The provision of affordable housing in Cleveland: Patterns of organizational and financial support. In Affordable housing and urban redevelopment in the United States, ed. Willem van Vliet, 52-72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
77. Lauber, Daniel. 1984. Condominium conversions: A reforminneed of reform. In Land reform, American style, eds. Charles C. Geisler and Frank J. Popper, 273-301. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.
78. Leavitt, Jacqueline, and Susan Saegert.1990. From abandonment to hope. New York: Columbia University Press.
79. Lemann, Nicholas. 1994. Themyth of community development: Rebuilding the ghetto doesn't work. New York Times Magazine, January 9, 27-31, 50, 54, 60.
80. Libby, James M., and Darby Bradley. 2000. Vermont Housing and Conservation Board: A conspiracy of good will among land trusts and housing trusts. In Property and values, eds. Charles Geisler and Gail Daneker, 261-281. Washington, DC: Island Press.
81. Listokin, David. 1976. Fair share housing allocation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
82. Listokin, David, with Lizabeth Allewelt and James J. Nemeth. 1985. Housing receivership and self-help neighborhood revitalization. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
83. Logan, John R., and Harvey L. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press. Luquetta, Andrea Caliz, and Deborah Goldberg. 2001. Insuring reinvestment. Shelterforce, 23:12-15, November/December.
84. Lutton, Linda. 1997.There goes theneighborhood. The Neighborhood Works, 20:16-23, July/August.
85. Mallach, Alan. 1994. The legacy of Mt. Laurel: Maintaining affordability in New Jersey's inclusionary developments. In The affordable city:Toward a third sector housing policy, ed. John Emmeus Davis, 226-244. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
86. Mallach, Alan. 1988. Opening the suburbs: New Jersey's Mount Laurel experience. Shelterforce, 11:12-15, August/September.
87. Meck, Stuart, Rebecca Retzlaff and James Schwab. 2003. Regional approaches to affordable housing. Chicago: American Planning Association.
88. Medoff, Peter, and Holly Sklar. 1994. Streets of hope: The fall and rise of an urban neighborhood. Boston: South End Press.
89. Morrissy, Patrick. 1987. Housing receivership: A step toward community control. Shelterforce, 10:8-10, January/February.
90. National Center for Policy Alternatives. 1988. Legislative sourcebook on financial deregulation. Washington, DC: The Center.
91. Nelson, Arthur C. 2003. Top ten state and local strategies to increase affordable housing supply. Housing Facts & Findings, 5(1):1, 4-7.
92. Nenno, Mary K. 1997. Changes and challenges in affordable housing and urban development. In Affordable housing and urban redevelopment in the United States, ed. Willem van Vliet, 1-21. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
93. Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California and California Coalition for Rural Housing (NPH/CCRH). 2003. Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation, San Francisco.
94. Norquist, Grover. 1996.The Spiritof '96. PolicyReview, 77:24-32, May/June.
95. Nye, Nancy, and Norman J. Glickman. 2000. Working together: Building capacity for community development. Housing Policy Debate, 11(1):163-198.
96. Orfield, Gary. 1996. Segregatedhousing and school resegregation. InDismantling desegregation:Thequiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education, eds. Gary Orfield and Susan E. Eaton, 291-332. New York: The New Press.
97. Orfield, Myron. 1997.Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
98. Poverty and Race Research Action Council (PRRAC). 1992. Boston bank agrees to precedent-setting settlement to aid victims of home improvement loan scams. Poverty and race, 1(2):5-6.
99. Qadeer, M. A. 1981. The nature of urban land. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40(2):165-182.
100. Quigley, John M., and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1996. Federalism and reductions in the federal budget. National Tax Journal, Symposium on the Devolution Revolution, 49(2):289-301.
101. Retsinas, Nicholas P. 1999. Lower-income homeowners: Struggling to keep the dream alive. Housing Facts & Findings, 1(3).
102. Rose, Kalima, and Julie Silas. 2001. Achieving equity through smart growth: Perspectives from philanthropy. Oakland, CA: Policy Link and the Funders' Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities.
103. Rusk, David. 1999. Inside game/Outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
104. Sachs, Beth, and Allan S. Hunt. 1992. The critical role of state housing finance agencies in promoting energy efficiency in buildings. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, conference proceedings from summer study on energy efficiency in buildings.
105. Sidor, John. 1995. Transforming community development policy and practice.Washington, DC: Council of State Community Development Agencies, September.
106. Sidor, John. 1996. The CDBG program, empowerment, and welfare reform. Washington, DC: Council of State Community Development Agencies, May.
107. Smart Growth Network. 2001. Affordable housing and smart growth: Making the connection. Washington, DC: Smart Growth Network and the National Neighborhood Coalition.
108. Smith, Steven R., and Michael Lipsky. 1993.Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
109. Squires, Gregory D. 1994. Capital and communities in black and white. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
110. Squires, Gregory D. 1995. Insurance redlining: Still fact, not fiction." Shelterforce, 17:17-19, January/February.
111. Squires, Gregory D. 1997. Insurance redlining:Disinvestment, reinvestment, and the evolving role of financial institutions. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
112. Squires, Gregory D. 2003. Introduction: The rough road to reinvestment. In Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and the democratization of financial institutions, ed. Gregory D. Squires, 1-26. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
113. Stoecker, Randy. 1995. TheCDCmodel of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1):1-22.
114. Stone, Michael. 1993. Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
115. Taylor, John, and JoshSilver. 2003. The essential role of activism in community reinvestment. In Organizing access to capital: Advocacy and the democratization of financial institutions, ed. GregoryD. Squires, 169-187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
116. Terner, Ian Donald, and Thomas B. Cook. 1990. New directions for federal housing policy: The role of the states. In Building foundations:Housing and federal policy, eds. Denise DiPasquale and Langley C. Keyes, 113-135. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
117. Thompson, Ellen Bowyer, and John Sidor. 1991. State housing initiatives: The 1990 Compendium. Washington, DC: Council of State Community Affairs Agencies (COSCAA).
118. Toulan, Nohad A. 1994. Housing as a state planning goal. In Planning the Oregon way: A twenty-year evaluation, eds. Carl Abbot, Deborah Howe and Sy Adler, 91-120. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
119. Vale, Lawrence J. 1997. The revitalization of Boston's Commonwealth Public Housing Development. In Affordable housing and urban redevelopment in the United States, ed.WillemvanVliet, 100-134.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2002. Reclaiming public housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Varady, David, and Jeffrey Raffel. 1995. Selling cities: Attracting homebuyers through schools and housing programs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
121. Weaver, R. Kent. 1996. Deficits and devolution in the 104th Congress. Publius, 26(3):45-85.
122. Wheeler, Michael. 1990. Resolving local regulatory disputes and building consensus for affordable housing. In Building foundations: Housing and federal policy, eds. Denise DiPasquale and Langley C. Keyes, 209-239. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
123. White, Andrew, and Susan Saegert. 1997. Return from abandonment: The tenant interim lease program and the development of low-income cooperatives in New York's most neglected neighborhoods. In Affordable housing and urban redevelopment in the United States, ed. Willem van Vliet, 158-180. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
124. Wish, Naomi Bailin, and Stephen Eisdorfer. 1997. The impact of Mt. Laurel initiatives: An analysis of the characteristics of applicants and occupants. Seton Hall Law Review, 27(4):1268-1337.
125. Yeoman, Barry. 1997. The real state takeover. The Nation, 264:21-24, February 24.
126. Zarembka, Arlene. 1990. The urban housing crisis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.