Housing and economic security

A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 399-426

  Bratt, Rachel G ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449153882     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (120)

1. ACORN. 2004. "Introduction to ACORN's living wage web site." March 13. http://livingwagecampaign.org.
2. Albelda, Randy, and Chris Tilly. 1997. Glass ceilings and bottomless pits:Women'swork, women's poverty. Boston: South End Press.
3. Bernstein, Jared, Elizabeth C. McNichol, Lawrence Mishel and Robert Zahradnik. 2000. Pulling apart: A state-by-state analysis of income trends. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Economic Policy Institute.
4. Berube, Alan. 2004. Making work pay: Building incomes and assets through the Earned Income Tax Credit. Building Blocks, Vol. 5., No. 1, Winter.Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
5. Bogdon, Amy S. 1999. What can we learn from previous housing-based self-sufficiency programs? In The home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy, ed. Sandra J. Newman. 1999.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
6. Boston Globe. 2004. "Welfare vision," April 6.
7. Bradbury, Katharine L., and Anthony Downs, eds. 1981. Do housing allowances work? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
8. Bratt, Rachel G. 2002. Housing and family well-being. Housing Studies, 17(1):13-26.
9. Bratt, Rachel G. 2003. Housing: The foundation of family life. In Promoting child, adolescent, and family development: A handbook of program and policy innovations, eds. Richard M. Lerner, Francine Jacobs and Donald Wertlieb. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 445-468.
10. Bratt, Rachel G., and Langley C. Keyes. 1997. New perspectives on self-sufficiency: Strategies of nonprofit housing organizations. Medford, MA: Department of Urban and Environmental Policy, Tufts University. 1998. Challenges confronting nonprofit housing organizations' self-sufficiency programs. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4):795-824.
11. Bryson, David B., and Roberta L. Youmans. 1991. Passage frompoverty: Self-sufficiencypolicies and federal housing programs.Washington, DC: National Support Center for Low Income Housing (a joint project of the Low Income Housing Information Service and the National Housing Law Project).
12. Center for Community Change. 1999a. Comprehensive services in public housing: Lessons from the field. Washington, DC: The Center.
13. Center for Community Change. 1999b. Jobs and welfare reform. Washington, DC. http://www.communitychange.org/jobswelfare.htm.
14. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 1999. The family self-sufficiency program. http://www.cbpp.org.5-5-99hous.htm
15. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2005. "Economic recovery failed to benefit much of the population in 2004." August30.
16. Council of State Community Development Agencies and the American Public Welfare Association. 1991. Linking housing and human services: Describing the context. Background Paper, Washington, DC
17. Currie, Janet M. 1995. Welfare and the well-being of children. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
18. Currie, Janet M., and Aaron Yelowitz. 2000. Are public housing projects good for kids? Journal of Public Economics, 75:99-124.
19. Dolbeare, Cushing N., Irene Basloe Saraf and Sheila Crowley. 2004. Changing priorities: The federal budget and housing assistance, 1976-2005. Washington, DC: National Low Income Housing Coalition.
20. Downs, Anthony. 1994. New visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
21. Economic Policy Institute. 2005.Minimumwage: Frequently asked questions. http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issueguides minwageminwagefaq. September 30, 2005.
22. Economic Success Clearinghouse. 2005. http://www.financeproject.org/irc/win/work.asp. October 1, 2005.
23. Etzioni, Amitai, ed. 1995. Rights and the common good. New York: St. Martin's Press.
24. Freeman, Lance. 1998. Interpreting the dynamics of public housing: Cultural and rational choice explanations. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2):323-353.
25. Galster, George. 2003. Investigating behavioral impacts of poor neighborhoods: Towards new data and analytic strategies. Housing Studies, 18(6):893-914.
26. Goldsmith, William W., and Edward J. Blakely. 1992. Separate societies: Poverty and inequality in U.S. cities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27. Greenstein, Robert, Joel Friedman and Isaac Shapiro. 2005. New tax cuts primarily benefiting millionaires slated to take effect in January: Should they be implemented while Katrina costs mount? Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
28. Harrington, Michael. 1962. The other America: Poverty in the United States. Baltimore: Penguin Books. Hartman, Chester. 1983. Housing allowances: A critical look. Journal of Urban Affairs, 5(1):41-55.
29. Ihlanfeldt, Keith R., and David L. Sjoquist. 1998. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4):849-892.
30. Jargowsky, Paul A. 2003. Stunning progress, hidden problems: The dramatic decline of concentrated poverty in the 1990s.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
31. Johnson, Nicholas, Joseph Llobrera and Bob Zahradnik. 2003. A hand up: How state Earned Income Tax Credits helpworking families escape poverty in 2003. Summary. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
32. Kain, John F. 1992. The SpatialMismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later. Housing Policy Debate. 3(2): 371-460.
33. Kasarda, John D. 1993. Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3):253-302.
34. Katz, Michael B. 1989. The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon.
35. Kemeny, Jim. 1986. A critique of homeownership. In Critical Perspectives on Housing, eds. Rachel G. Bratt, Chester Hartman and Ann Meyerson, 272-276.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
36. Khadduri, Jill, Mark Shroder and Barry Steffen. 2003. Can housing assistance support welfare reform? In A place to live, a means to work: How housing assistance can strengthen welfare policy, eds. Barbara Sard and Amy S. Bogdon.Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
37. Krugman, Paul. 2002. For richer. New York TimesMagazine, October 20.
38. Lav, Iris J., and Greenstein, Robert. 1999. Tax bill contains only modest benefits for middle class despite its high cost. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/8-20-99tax.htm.
39. Lazere, Ed. 2000. Welfare balances after three years of TANFblock grants:UnspentTANFfunds at theend of federal fiscal year 1999.Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
40. Li, Xiaoming, Bonito Stanton, Maureen M. Black, Daniel Roamer, Isabel Ricardo and Linda Killjoy. 1997. Risk behavior and perception among youths residing in urban public housing developments. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 71(2):252-266.
41. Llobrera, Joseph and Bob Zahradnik. 2004. A hand up: Howstate Earned IncomeTaxCredits helpworking families escape poverty in 2004. Summary. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
42. Loprest, Pamela. 1999. Families who left welfare:Who are they and how are they doing? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
43. Llobrera, Joseph and Bob Zahradnik. 2001.Howare families that leftwelfare doing? A comparison of early and recent welfare leavers. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
44. Llobrera, Joseph and Bob Zahradnik. 2002. The next welfare reform: Counter boomerang effect. Christian ScienceMonitor, Electronic Edition, September 20. http://www.urban.org/urlprint.cfm?ID=7917.
45. Llobrera, Joseph and Bob Zahradnik. 2003a. Fewer welfare leavers employed in weak economy.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, September. Snapshots of America's families, No. 5.
46. Llobrera, Joseph and Bob Zahradnik. 2003b. Use of government benefits increases among families leaving welfare. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, September. Snapshots of America's families, No. 6.
47. Marcuse, Peter. 1986. Housing policy and the myth of the benevolent state. In Critical Perspectives on Housing, eds. Rachel G. Bratt, Chester Hartman and AnnMeyerson, 248-258. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
48. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency. 1999. Impact of welfare reformon developments financed by the Massachusetts housing finance agency.Boston:The Agency.
49. McGough, Duane T. 1997. Characteristics of HUDassisted renters and their units in 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
50. Meyers, Alan, Dana Rubin, Maria Napoleone and KevinNichols. 1993. Public housing subsidies may improve poor children's nutrition. American Journal of Public Health, 83(1):115.
51. Millennial Housing Commission. 2002. Report of the bipartisanMillennialHousingCommission:Meeting our nation's housing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52. Miller Cynthia, and James A. Riccio. 2002. Making work pay for public housing residents: Financial incentive designs at six jobs-plus demonstration sites. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
53. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. 1968. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York: Bantam Books.
54. National Coalition for the Homeless. 1999. Homeless families with children. N.H. Fact Sheet #7. http://nch.ari.net/families.html
55. National Low Income Housing Coalition. 1986. Tax bill spells victory for low income concerns. Low Income Housing Round-up, September. 2004. Out of Reach 2004. Washington, DC: The Coalition.
56. Newman, Sandra J., ed. 1999. The home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
57. Newman, Sandra J., and Ann B. Schnare. 1992. Beyond bricks and mortar: Reexamining the purpose and effects of housing assistance. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press. Report 92-3.
58. Newman, Sandra J., and Ann B. Schnare. 1993. Last in line: Housing assistance for households with children. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3):417-455.
59. Newman, Sandra J., and Joseph Harkness. 2000. Assisted housing and the educational attainment of children. Journal of Housing Economics, 9:40-63.
60. Newman, Sandra J., and Joseph Harkness. 2002. The long-term effects of housing assistance on self-sufficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(1):21-35.
61. Nichols, Laura, and Barbara Gault. 1999. The effects of welfare reform on housing stability and homelessness: Current research findings, legislation, and programs. Welfare Reform Network News, 2(2), March.
62. Ong, Paul. 1998. Subsidized housing and work among welfare recipients. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4):775-794.
63. Online Athens. 1998. IRS study finds 1,137 wealthy taxpayers paid no taxes in 1994. March 31. http://www.onlineathens.com/1998/033198/0331.a3tax.html.
64. Orfield, Gary, Daniel Losen, Johanna Wald and Christopher B. Swanson. 2004. Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
65. Orr, Larry, JudithD. Feins, Robin Jacob, Erik Beecroft, Lisa Sanbonmatsu, Lawrence F. Katz, Jeffrey B. Liebman and Jeffrey R. Kling. 2003. Moving to opportunity interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
66. Parrott, Sharon. 1998. Welfare recipients who find jobs: What do we know about their employment and earnings? Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
67. Pearce, Diana, with Jennifer Brooks. 2003. The selfsufficiency standard for Delaware. Washington, DC:Wider Opportunities forWomen.
68. Pines, Marion. 1991. Self-sufficiency:Aninvestment in poor families. Journal of Housing, May/June, 110-116.
69. Porter, Kathryn. 1999. Proposed changes in the official measure of poverty. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/11-15-99wel.htm.
70. Porter, Kathryn, and Wendell Primus. 1999. Changes since 1995 in the safety net's impact on child poverty. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
71. Primus, Wendell. 1996. The safety net delivers: The effects of government benefit programs in reducing poverty. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/SAFETY.htm.
72. Primus, Wendell, Lynette Rawlings, Kathy Lain and Kathryn Porter. 1999. The initial impacts of welfare reformon the incomes of single-mother families. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
73. Reingold, David A. 1997. Does inner city public housing exacerbate the employment problems of its tenants? Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(4):469-486.
74. Rohe, William M. 1995. Assisting residents of public housing achieve self-sufficiency: An evaluation of Charlotte's Gateway Families Program. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 12(3).
75. Rohe, William M., and Michael A. Stegman. 1991. Coordinating housing and social services: The new imperative. Carolina Planning,46-50, Fall.
76. Rohe, William M., and Rachel Garshick Kleit. 1997. From dependency to self-sufficiency: An appraisal of the Gateway Transitional Families Program. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1):75-108.
77. Rohe, William M., and Rachel Garshick Kleit. 1999. Housing, welfare reform, and selfsufficiency: An assessment of the Family Self- Sufficiency Program. Housing Policy Debate, 10(2): 333-369.
78. Rosenbaum, James E. 1995. Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons fromthe Gautreaux Program. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1):231-269.
79. Rusk, David. 1998.AbellReport: To improve poor children's test scores, move poor families. Baltimore: Abell Foundation.
80. Sard, Barbara. 2001. The Family Self-Sufficiency Program: HUD's best kept secret for promoting employment and asset growth.Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
81. Sard, Barbara. 2003. The role of housing providers in an era of welfare reform. InAplace to live, a means to work: Howhousing assistance can strengthenwelfare policy, eds. Barbara Sard and Amy S. Bogdon. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
82. Sard, Barbara, and Jennifer Daskal. 1998. Housing and welfare reform: Some background information. Washington, DC: Centeron Budget and Policy Priorities.
83. Sard, Barbara, and Jeff Lubell. 2000a. The increasing use of TANF and state matching funds to provide housing assistance to families moving from welfare to work. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
84. Sard, Barbara, and Jeff Lubell. 2000b. The Family Self-Sufficiency Program. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
85. Sard, Barbara, and Mary Waller. 2002. Housing strategies to strengthen welfare policy and support working families. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution and Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
86. Schorr, Lisbeth B. 1997. Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday. Schwartz, Alex, and Kian Tajbakhsh. 1997. Mixedincome housing:Unansweredquestions.Cityscape, 3(2):71-92.
87. Shapiro, Isaac, and Robert Greenstein. 1999. The widening income gulf. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/9-4-99tax-rep.htm.
88. Shapiro, Isaac, Robert Greenstein and James Sly. 2001. Under conference agreement, dollar gains for top one percent essentially the same as under House and Bush packages; share of tax cuts to top fifth basically identicalunder the differentpackages.Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/5-26-01tax2.htm
89. Sherman, Alroc, Cheryl Amey, Barbara Duffield, Nancy Ebb and Deborah Weinstein. 1998. Welfare towhat: Earlyfindings onfamily hardship and well being. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund and National Coalition for the Homeless.
90. Shlay, Anne B. 1993. Family self-sufficiency and housing. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3):457-495.
91. Shlay, Anne B. 1995. Housing in the broader context in the UnitedStates.HousingPolicyDebate, 6(3):695-720.
92. Shlay, Anne B., and C. Scott Holupka. 1992. Steps toward independence: Evaluating an integrated service program for public housing residents. Evaluation Review, 16.
93. Shroder, Mark. 2001. Moving to opportunity: An experiment in social and geographic mobility. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 5(3):57-67.
94. Skocpol, Theda. 2000. The missing middle. New York: W.W. Norton Company.
95. Smith, Alastair. 2002. Mixed-income housing developments: Promise and reality. Cambridge, MAand Washington, DC: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University and Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation.
96. Smith, Doug. 2003. Some taxpayers don't owe a penny. Los Angeles Times, April 15.
97. Squires, Gregory, D. 1994. Capital and communities in black and white: The intersections of race, class and uneven development. Albany: State University of New York Press.
98. Stone, Michael E. 1993. Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
99. Sweeney, Eileen, Liz Schott, Ed Lazere, Shawn Fremstad, Heidi Goldberg, Jocelyn Guyer, David Super and Clifford Johnson. 2000.Windows of opportunity: Strategies to support families receiving welfare and other low-income families in the next stage of welfare reform. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
100. Traub, James. 2000.What no school can do. New York Times Magazine, January 16.
101. Turner, Margery Austin. 1998.Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenantbased housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3):373-394.
102. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2002. Benefit levels for family of 3, July 1995- June 2001, March 14, 2004. http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ofa/annualreport5/1202.htm.
103. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2003. HHS releases data showing continuing decline in number of people receiving temporary assistance. September 3. http://www. hhs.gov/news/press/2003pres/20030903.html
104. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1994. Reinvention blueprint.Washington, DC. December 19.
105. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1999. Building communities and new markets for the new century: 1998 consolidated report. Washington, DC.
106. United States Department of Labor. 2005. Minimum wage laws in the states. http://www.dol.gov/ esa/minwage/america.htm. September 30, 2005.
107. United States General Accounting Office. 1993. Selfsufficiency: Opportunities and disincentives on the road to economic independence. GAO/HRD- 93-23.
108. United States General Accounting Office. 1995. Welfare programs: Opportunities to consolidate and increase program efficiencies. GAO/HEHS-95-139.
109. United States General Accounting Office. 1997. Poverty measurement: Issues in revising and updating the official definition. GAO/HEHS- 97-38.
110. United States General Accounting Office. 1998a. Welfare reform: Early fiscal effects of the TANF Block Grant. GAO/AIMD-98-137.
111. United States General Accounting Office. 1998b. Welfare reform: Changes will further shape the roles of housing agencies and HUD. GAO/RCED-98-148.
112. United States General Accounting Office. 1999. Welfare reform: Assessing the effectiveness of various welfare-to-work approaches. GAO/HEHS-99-179.
113. United States General Accounting Office. 2004. Tax administration: Comparison of the reported tax liabilities of foreign- and U.S. - controlled corporations, 1996-2000. GAO-04-358.
114. Varady, David, and Carole C. Walker. 2003. Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1):17-30.
115. Vernarelli, Michael J. 1986. Where should HUD locate assistedhousing? The evolution of fair housing policy. InHousingDesegregation and Federal Policy, eds. Barbara Sard and Amy S. Bogdon. ChapelHill: University of North Carolina Press.
116. Wider Opportunities for Women. 2003. Setting the standard for American working families: A report on the impact of the Family Economic Self- Sufficiency Project Nationwide.Washington, DC.
117. Williams, Christopher, Lawrence M. Scheier, Gilbert J. Botvin, Eli Baker and Nicole Miller. 1997. Journal of Child&Adolescent Substance Abuse, 6(1):69-89.
118. Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
119. Yinger, John. 1998. Housing discrimination is still worth worrying about. Housing Policy Debate, 9(4):893-927.
120. Zedlewski, Sheila Rafferty. 2002. The importance of housing benefits to welfare success. Survey Series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute.