The effects of using Direct instruction and a re-reading contingency with a high school student

International Journal of Special Education

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 50-54

  Gregory, Anne ^a   McLaughlin, T F ^a   Weber, K P ^a   Stookey, Sue ^b  

^a GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Spokane School District #81   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449150647     PISSN: 08273383     EISSN: 08273383     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Merrill.
2. Danziger, S., & Gottschalk, P. (1995). America unequal. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Darby, M.R. (Ed.). (1996). Reducing poverty in America: Views and approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Edmondson, A., Peck, S. M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). The effects of Direct Instruction on early reading skills of a kindergarten student. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14 (1), 72-77.
5. Engelmann, S., Becker, W.C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow through model: design and outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 303-317.
6. Engelmann, S., Meyer, L., Johnson, G., & Carnine, L. (1988). Corrective Reading: Skills applications, decoding c. Chicago: Scientific Research Associates.
7. Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct Instruction Research: The third decade. Remedial & Special Education, 8(6), 48-56.
8. Gersten R., Keating, T. & Becker W.C. (1988). The continued impact of Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 318-327.
9. Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
10. Holz, K. R., Peck, S. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Stookey, S. The effects of using Direct Instruction reading and a re-reading contingency coupled with a reward and praise contingency with a high school sophomore. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14 (1), 35-40.
11. Howard, V. F., McLaughlin, T.F., & Vacha, E.F. (1996). Educational capital: A proposed model and its relationship to academic and social behavior of students at risk. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 326-342.
12. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single case research design: Methods for clinical and Applied settings. New York: Oxford.
13. Lloyd, J., Cullinan, D., Heins, E.D., & Epstein. M.H. (1980). Direct Instruction: Effects on oral and written language comprehension. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 3, 70-76.
14. Markwardt, Frederick C. (1998). Peabody Individual Achievement Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MD. American Guidance Service.
15. National Review Board Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Review Board Reading Panel. Washington DC: Author.
16. Sadovnik, A. R. (1991). Basil Bernsteins's theory of pedagogic practice: A structuralist approach. Sociology of Education, 64, 48-63.
17. Siegel, S. (1956). Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw Hill.
18. Wiederholt, J. Lee., & Bryant, B. R. (1992). Gray Oral Reading Tests. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.