Perceived value of satisfaction with services provided to faculties among liaison librarians

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 105-111

  Bakar, Ahmad Bakeri Abu ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Faculty satisfaction; Liaison librarian; Malaysia; Reference librarians; University libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449140578     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Agbonifoh, B. A. 1998, Marketing in Nigeria: Concepts, principles and decisions. Aba Afritowers Limited
2. Dale, P. 2006. Professional engagement-the subject specialist in higher education, in Dale, P., Holland, M., Matthews, M. (Eds), Subject Librarians: Engaging with the learning and teaching environment. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
3. De Saez, E. E. 2002. Marketing concepts for libraries and information services, 2nd. ed., London: Facet.
4. Ducas, A. M. and Oystryk, N. M. 1987. Faculty perceptions of librarians at the University of Manitoba. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 64: 55-74.
5. Mozenter, F., Sanders, B. T., and Welch, J. M. 2000. Restructuring a liaison program in an academic library. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 34: 268-275.
6. Nor Hasyimah Mustapha. 2005. A survey on academic faculty perception and attitude towards the IIUM liaison librarian. Unpublished research report, Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Library.
7. Roberts, B. 1995. Working with our teaching faculty. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 56: 337-346.
8. Rodwell, J. and Fairbarin, L. 2008. Dangerous liaison? Defining the faculty liaison librarians service model, its effectiveness and sustainability. Library Review, Vol. 29, no. (1/2): 116-119.
9. Smith, D. 1995. Practice as a marketing tool: Four case studies. Library Trends, Vol. 43, Winter: 450-462.
10. Yang, Z. Y. 2000. University faculty's perception of a library liaison programme: A case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.26, no.2: 124-128