Is support for traditionally designed communities growing? Evidence from two national surveys

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 209-221

  Handy, Susan ^a   Sallis, James ^b   Weber, Deanne ^c   Maibach, Ed ^d   Hollander, Marla ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Porter Novelli   (United States)

^d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Built environment; Public attitudes; Smart growth; Traditional neighborhood design; Walkability

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY MAKING; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 65449133233     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360802010418     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Planning Association. (2002) Planning for smart growth: 2002 state of the states, Author., Chicago
2. Arendt, R. (2004) Crossroads, hamlet, village, town: Design characteristics of traditional neighborhoods, old and new (Planning Advisory Service Report Nos. 523/524, American Planning Association., Chicago
3. Bagley, M., Mokhtarian, P. L. and Kitamura, R. (2002) A methodology for the disaggregate, multidimensional measurement of residential neighborhood type. Urban Studies, 39:4, pp. 689-704.
4. Booth, K. M., Pinkston, M. M. and Poston, W. S. (2005) Obesity and the built environment. Journal of the American Dietetics Association, 105:5, pp. S110-S117.
5. Congress for the New Urbanism. (2004) Codifying new urbanism, American Planning Association, Chicago
6. Eppli, M. J. and Tu, C. C. (1999) Valuing the new urbanism, Urban Land Institute., Washington, DC
7. Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J. and Chen, D. (2007) Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC
8. Frank, L. D., Engelke, P. O. and Schmid, T. L. (2003) Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity, Island Press, Washington, DC
9. Frumkin, H., Frank, L. and Jackson, R. (2004) Urban sprawl and public health: Designing, planning, and building for healthy communities, Island Press., Washington, DC
10. Goldberg, D. (2007) The pulse at the polls. On Common Ground, pp. 6-13.
11. Heath, G., Brownson, R., Kruger, J., Miles, R., Powell, K. E., Ramsey, L. T. and the Task Force for Community Preventive Services. (2006) The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3:1, pp. S55-S76.
12. Hensher, D. (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice. Transportation, 21:2, pp. 107-133.
13. Katz, B. (2002) Smart growth: The future of the American metropolis?, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics., London
14. Korn, E. L. and Graubard, B. I. (1999) Analysis of health surveys, John Wiley & Sons, New York
15. Lohr, S. L. (1999) Sampling: Design and analysis, Duxbury Press., Pacific Grove, CA
16. Levine, J., Inam, A., Werbel, R. and Torng, G. W. (2002) Innovation in transportation and land use as expansion of household choice, Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University., San Jose, CA
17. Market Facts. (1994) Mail panels vs. general samples: How similar and how different?, Author., Arlington Heights, IL
18. Muro, M. and Puentes, R. (2004) Investing in a better future: A review of the fiscal and competitive advantages of smarter growth development patterns, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy., Washington, DC
19. Myers, D. and Gearin, E. (2001) Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 12:4, pp. 633-659.
20. National Trust for Historic Preservation. (2005) Smart growth schools: A fact sheet, Author, Washington, DC
21. Parry, H. J. and Crossley, H. M. (1950) Validity of responses to survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14:1, pp. 61-80.
22. Pollard, W. E. (2002) Use of consumer panel survey data for public health communication planning: An evaluation of survey results. American Statistical Association 2002 Proceedings of the Section on Health Policy Statistics, pp. 0-2724. Author., Alexandria, VA
23. Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community, Simon and Schuster, New York
24. Saelens, B. E. and Handy, S. L. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
25. Schilling, J. and Linton, L. S. (2005) The public health roots of zoning: In search of active living's legal genealogy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28:2, pp. 96-104.
26. Sturm, R. and Cohen, D. A. (2004) Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health. Public Health, 118:7, pp. 488-496.
27. Transportation Research Board Institute of Medicine (2005) Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence, National Academies Press., Washington, DC
28. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001) Our built and natural environments: A technical analysis of the interactions between transportation, land use, and environmental quality, Author, Washington, DC
29. Warnke, T., Houston, A., Jenkins, A., Silva, M. and Seward, J. (2004) Curbing sprawl at its core: Community development and revitalizing the built environment, American Planning Association., Chicago