Rethinking copyright: History, theory, language

Rethinking Copyright: History, Theory, Language

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Deazley, Ronan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449130314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (234)

1. Abrams, H. (1983), 'The Historic Foundation of American Copyright Law: Exploding the Myth of Common Law Copyright', Wayne Law Review, 1119.
2. Adams, J.N. (2005), 'Book Review', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 222.
3. Akoi, K. (1993-94), 'Authors, Inventors and Trademark Owners: Private Intellectual Property and the Public Domain, Part I', Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 1.
4. Akoi, K. (1993-94), 'Authors, Inventors and Trademark Owners: Private Intellectual Property and the Public Domain, Part II', Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 191.
5. Alexander, I. (2005), 'Book Review', Cambridge Law Journal, 510.
6. Anon. (1762), A Vindication of the Exclusive Right of Authors, to their Own Works: A Subject now under Consideration before the 12 Judges of England, London: Griffiths, British Library, BM 1130.d.4b.
7. Anon. (1835), 'Law of Copyright in America', Law Magazine, 13, 331.
8. Anon. (1838), 'The Law of Copyright', Law Magazine, 19, 365.
9. Anon. (1841), 'Copyright in Sermons', Law Magazine, 25, 249.
10. Anon. (1855), 'Notes of Leading Cases', Law Magazine, 53, 368.
11. Anon. (1869), 'Anglo-American Copyright', Law Magazine and Review, 26, 49.
12. Astbury, R. (1978), 'The Renewal of the Licensing Act in 1693 and its Lapse in 1695', The Library, 296.
13. Australian Copyright Law Review Committee (2001), Copyright and Contract, available at www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/clrhome.nsf/AllDocs/ 092E76FE8AF2501CCA256C44001FFC28?Open Document.
14. Bainbridge, D. (2002), 'Implementing the Directive on Copyright in the Information Society', Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law, 9.
15. Bainbridge, D. (2002), Intellectual Property, 5th edn, Harlow: Longman.
16. Ball, H.G. (1944), The Law of Copyright and Literary Property, New York: Banks and Company.
17. Barnes, J.J.B. (1974), Authors, Publishers and Politicians: The Quest for an Anglo-American Copyright Agreement 1815-1854, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18. Bellini, V. (1831), The Sleepwalker, London: Brettell.
19. Bellini, V. (1850), Beauties of Bellini: Trois amusements, pour le piano forte, sur la motifs favoris de l'opéra La Sonnambula, London: Purday.
20. Benkler, Y. (1999), 'Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on Enclosure of the Public Domain', New York University Law Review, 354.
21. Bewes, W.A. (1891), Copyright, Patents, Designs, Trade Marks, etc.: A Manual of Practical Law, London: Black.
22. A Bill for the Better Encouragement of Learning and the more Effectual Securing of the Copies of Printed Books to the Authors or Purchasers of such Copies, during the Times therein mentioned (1735), Bodleian Library, MS Carte 114, 391-6
23. A Bill for the Better Encouragement of Learning by the more Effectual Securing of the Copies of Printed Books to the Authors or Purchasers of such Copies (1737), British Library, BS68/16(1)
24. Birnhack, M.D. (2001), 'The Dead Sea Scrolls: Who is an Author?', European Intellectual Property Review, 128.
25. Birnhack, M. (2003), 'Acknowledging the Conflict between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act', Entertainment Law Review, 24.
26. Birnhack, M. (2003), 'The Copyright Law and Free Speech Affair: Making-Up and Breaking-Up', IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 233.
27. Birrell, A. (1899), Copyright in Books, London: Cassell & Co.
28. Blackstone, W. (1766), Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 2, reprinted in (1979), A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765-1769, Chicago, US and London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
29. Bott, C.M. (1998-99), 'Protection of Information Products: Balancing Commercial Reality and the Public Domain', U. Cin. L. Rev., 237.
30. Bowker, R.R. (1886), Copyright: Its Law and Its Literature, London: Sampson Law & Co.
31. Bowker, R.R. (1912), Copyright: Its History and Its Law, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
32. Boyle, J. (1996), Shamans, Software, & Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, Cambridge, US and London, UK: Harvard University Press.
33. Boyle, J. (2003), 'The Opposite of Property?', Law & Contemp. Probs, 1.
34. Boyle, J. (2003), 'The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain', Law & Contemp Probs, 33.
35. Bracha, O. (2004), 'The Commodification of Patents 1600-1836: How Patents Became Rights and Why We Should Care', Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 177.
36. Braun, N. (2003), 'The Interface between the Protection of Technological Measures and the Exercise of Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights: Comparing the Situation in the United States and in the European Community', European Intellectual Property Review, 496.
37. Briggs, W. (1900), The Law of Literary Copyright: Parts I to IV on the Origin, History and Nature of Copyright, London: Clive.
38. Briggs, W. (1906), The Law of International Copyright (with Special Sections on the Colonies and the USA), London: Stevens and Haynes.
39. Britton, J. (1814), The Right of Literature, or an Inquiry into the Policy and Justice of the Claims of Certain Public Libraries on all the Publishers and Authors of the United Kingdom, London: Valpy.
40. Brydges, E. (1813), A Summary Statement of the Great Grievance imposed on Authors and Publishers, London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown.
41. Budd, A. (2005), Times Literary Supplement, 15 July.
42. Burke, P. (1842), A Treatise on the Law of Copyright in Literature, The Drama, Music, Engraving and Sculpture, London: Richards.
43. Burrell, R. (2001), 'Reigning in Copyright Law: Is Fair Use the Answer?', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 361.
44. Cahir, J. (2005), 'The Moral Preference for DRM Ordered Markets in the Digitally Networked Environment', in Macmillan, F. (ed.), New Directions in Copyright Law, vol. I, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.
45. Carson, C.A. (1995), 'Raiders of the Lost Scrolls: The Right of Scholarly Access to the Content of Historic Documents', Michigan Journal of International Law, 299.
46. Carter, H. (1975), A History of the Oxford University Press to the Year 1780, [1,] Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Chamier, D. (1895), Law Relating to Literary Copyright, London: Effingham Wilson.
48. Chappell, F.P. and Shoard, J. (1863), A Handy-Book of the Law of Copyright, London: Henry Sweet.
49. Christie, A. (2001), 'A Proposal for Simplifying United Kingdom Copyright Law', European Intellectual Property Review, 26.
50. Clark, C. (1866), Digest of House of Lords Reports, 1814-1866, London: Butterworths.
51. Cobbett, W. (1813), Parliamentary History from the Norman Conquest, in [1066,] to the Year 1803 (44 volumes), 17, London: Hansard.
52. Cochrane, J.G. (1813), The Case Stated between The Public Libraries and the Booksellers, London: Moyes.
53. Cole, R.C. (1986), Irish Booksellers and English Writers, 1740-1800, Kent: Mansell Publishing Ltd/Humanities Press International.
54. Colles, W.M. and Hardy, H. (1906), Playright and Copyright in all Countries, London: MacMillan & Co.
55. Collins, P. (2005), yeah ..... you, baby you, Hove: Shady Lane Publications.
56. Colston, C. and Middleton, K. (2005), Modern Intellectual Property Law, 2nd edn, London: Cavendish Publishing.
57. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002), Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy, London: CIPR
58. Cook, T. and Brazell, L. (2004), The Copyright Directive: UK Implementation, Bristol: Jordan Publishing.
59. Cooke, P.J. (1895), A Handbook of The Drama, Westminster: Roxburghe Press.
60. Coombe, R.J. (2002-03), 'Fear, Hope and Longing for the Future of Authorship and a Revitalized Public Domain in Global Regimes of Intellectual Property', DePaul Law Review, 1171.
61. Copinger, W.A. (1870), The Law of Copyright in Works of Literature and Art, [1st] edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
62. Copinger, W.A. (1881), The Law of Copyright, 2nd edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
63. Copinger, W.A. (1893), The Law of Copyright, 3rd edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
64. Copinger, W.A. (1904), The Law of Copyright, 4th edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
65. Cornish, W. and Llewelyn, D. (2003), Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, 5th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
66. Cramer, E.M. and Block, L. (1991-92), 'Public Domain: Available but not Always Free', Fordham Ent. Media & Intellectual Property Law F., 1.
67. Crist, T. (1979), 'Government Control of the Press After the Expiration of the Printing Act in 1679', Publishing History, 49.
68. Curtis, G.T. (1847), A Treatise on the Law of Copyright, London, UK and Boston, US: Maxwell & Son and Little and Brown.
69. Cutler, E. (1890), The Law of Musical and Dramatic Copyright, London: Cassell & Co.
70. Cutler, E. (1905), A Manual of Musical Copyright Law, London: Simpkin et al.
71. Davies G. (2002), Copyright and the Public Interest, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
72. Deazley, R. (2001), 'Photographing Paintings in the Public Domain: A Response to Garnett', European Intellectual Property Review, 179.
73. Deazley, R. (2003), 'Struggling with Authority: The Photograph in British Legal History', History of Photography, 236.
74. Deazley, R. (2003), 'The Myth of Copyright at Common Law', Cambridge Law Journal, 106.
75. Deazley, R. (2004), 'Copyright in the House of Lords: Recent Cases, Judicial Reasoning and Academic Writing', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 121.
76. Deazley, R. (2004), On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth-Century Britain, 1695-1775, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
77. De Beer, E.S. (ed.) (1978), The Correspondence of John Locke, in Eight Volumes, 5, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
78. Defoe, D. (1704), An Essay on the Regulation of the Press, reprinted by the Luttrell Society (1958), Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Doupe, M. and Salter, M. (2000), 'Approaching the Nature and History of Property Law: The Limits of the Cheshire World View', King's College Law Review, 49.
80. Doupe, M. and Salter, M. (2000), 'Concealing the Past?: Questioning Textbook Interpretations of the History of Equity and Trusts', Liverpool Law Review, 253.
81. Drahos, P. (with Braithwaite, J.) (2002), Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?, London: Earthscan.
82. Drahos, P. (1996), A Philosophy of Intellectual Property, Aldershot: Ashgate.
83. Drahos, P. (1999), 'Intellectual Property and Human Rights', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 349.
84. Dreyfuss, R., Zimmerman, D.L. and First, H. (eds) (2001), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Drone, E.S. (1879), A Treatise on the Law of Property in Intellectual Productions, Boston: Little Brown and Company.
86. Dusollier, S. (2003), 'Exceptions and Technological Measures in the European Copyright Directive of 2001 - An Empty Promise', International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, 62.
87. Duxbury, N. (2000), 'When We Were Young: Notes in the Law Quarterly Review, 1885-1925', Law Quarterly Review, 474.
88. Duxbury, N. (2001), Judges and Jurists: An Essay on Influence, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
89. Easton, J.M. (1904), Copinger: The Law of Copyright, 4th edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
90. Easton, J.M. (1915), Copinger: The Law of Copyright, 5th edn, London: Stevens & Haynes.
91. Edmunds, L. and Bentwich, H. (1908), The Law of Copyright in Designs, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
92. Elkin-Koren, N. (2001), 'A Public-regarding Approach to Contracting over Copyrights', in Dreyfuss, R., Zimmerman, D.L. and First, H. (eds),Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Espinasse, I. (1824), A Treatise on the Law of Actions on Statutes ... and on the Statutes Respecting Copyright, London.
94. Feather, J. (1994), Publishing, Piracy and Politics: An Historical Study of Copyright in Britain, London: Mansell.
95. Fifoot, C.H.S. (1859), Judge and Jurist in the Reign of Victoria, London: Stevens & Sons.
96. Fraser, J. (1860), A Handy-Book of Patent and Copyright Law, London: Samson Low.
97. Garnett, K. (2000), 'Copyright in Photographs', European Intellectual Property Review, 229.
98. Garnett, K., Davies, G. and Harbottle, G. (eds) (2005), Copinger and Skone James on Copyright, 15th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
99. Ginsberg, J. (2003), 'From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in US Copyright Law', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 113.
100. Ginsburg, J.C. (2002-03), 'Essay - How Copyright Got a Bad Name for Itself', Columbia Journal of Law & The Arts, 61.
101. Godson, R. (1823), A Practical Treatise on the Law of Patents for Inventions and of Copyright, London: Butterworth and Son.
102. Goldstein, P. (2003), 'Fair Use in a Changing World', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 133.
103. Griffiths, J. (2000), 'Copyright in English Literature: Denying the Public Domain', European Intellectual Property Review, 150.
104. Griffiths, J. (2002), 'Copyright Law after Ashdown - Time to Deal Fairly with the Public', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 240.
105. Griffiths, J. and Suthersanen, U. (eds) (2005), Copyright and Free Speech: Comparative and International Analyses, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. Gummow, W.M.C. (2005), 'Book Review', Australian Law Journal, 92.
107. Hall, J.L. (1995), 'Blues and the Public Domain - No More Dues to Pay?', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 215.
108. Hargrave, F. (1774), An Argument in Defence of Literary Property, London: Otridge, reprinted in Parks, S. (ed.) (1974), Four Tracts on Freedom of the Press, 1790-1821, New York, US and London, UK: Garland Publishing.
109. Hart, M. (2002), 'The Copyright in the Information Society Directive: An Overview', European Intellectual Property Review, 58.
110. Hawkins, C. (1998), 'Technological Measures: Saviour or Saboteur of the Public Domain?', Journal of Law and Information Science, 45.
111. Heide, T. (2002), 'The Approach to Innovation Under the Proposed Copyright Directive: Time for Mandatory Exceptions?', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 215.
112. Heide, T. (2003), 'Copyright, Contract and the Legal Protection of Technological Measures - Not "The Old Fashioned Way": Providing a Rationale to the Copyright Exceptions Interface', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 315.
113. Hinkson, H.A. (1903), Copyright Law, London: Bullen.
114. Holdsworth, W.S. (1924), A History of English Law, VI, London: Methuen and Co.
115. Hotten, J.C. (1871), Literary Copyright: Seven Letters, London: Hotten.
116. Howard, A. (1887), Copyright: A Manual for Authors and Publishers, London: Griffith, Farran & Co.
117. Howell, H.A. (1942), The Copyright Law: An Analysis of the Law of the United States Governing Registration and Protection of Copyright Works, Including Prints and Labels, Washington: The Bureau of National Affairs.
118. The Independent on Sunday (2004), 'Copyright row threat to "Ulysses" centenary', 16 June
119. Ives, E.W. and Manchester, A.H. (eds) (1983), Law, Litigants and the Legal Profession, London: Royal Historical Society.
120. Jaszi, P. (1996), 'Goodbye to All That - A Reluctant (and perhaps premature) Adieu to a Constitutionally-Grounded Discourse of Public Interest in Copyright Law', Vand J Transnat'l L, 595.
121. Jerrold, S. (1881), A Handbook of English and Foreign Copyright, London: Chatto and Windus.
122. Kaplan, B. (1967), An Unhurried View of Copyright, New York, US and London, UK: Columbia University Press.
123. Khan, B.Z. (2002), Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Lessons from American and European History, Study Paper for the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, available at: www.iprcommission.org/papers/ pdfs/study_papers/sp1a_khan_study.pdf.
124. Koenigsberg, F. (2004), 'Humpty-Dumpty in Copyrightland', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 677.
125. Krasilovsky, M. William (1967), 'Observations on Public Domain', Bulletin of the Copyright Society, 205.
126. Kretschmer, M. (2003), 'Digital Copyright: The End of an Era', European Intellectual Property Review, 333.
127. Krüger, H.C. (2004), 'The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights: An Overview', in Peers, S. and Ward, A. (eds), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
128. Laddie, H. (1996), 'Copyright: Over-strength, Over-regulated, Over-rated?', European Intellectual Property Review, 253.
129. Lange, D. (1981), 'Recognizing the Public Domain', Law & Contemp. Probs, 147.
130. Lange, D. (2003), 'Reimagining the Public Domain', Law & Contemp. Probs, 463.
131. Leader, D. (2002), Stealing the Mona Lisa: What Art Stops us from Seeing, London: Faber & Faber.
132. Lemley, M.A. (1997), 'Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property', Texas Law Review, 873.
133. Leverson, M.R. (1854), Copyright and Patents, or, Property in Thought, London: Wildy & Sons.
134. Litman, J. (1990), 'The Public Domain', Emory Law Journal, 965.
135. Litman J. (1991), 'Copyright as Myth', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 235.
136. Litman J. (2001), Digital Copyright, New York: Prometheus Books.
137. Locke, J. (1690), Second Treatise on Government, reprinted in Gough, J.W. (ed.) (1966), Oxford: Blackwell.
138. Loewenstein, J. (2002), The Author's Due: Printing and the Prehistory of Copyright, London: University of Chicago Press.
139. Lofft, C. (1776), Reports of Cases adjudged in the Court of King's Bench, 12 Geo. 3-14 Geo. 3, London: Owen.
140. Loren, L.P. (2002), 'Technological Protections in Copyright Law: Is More Legal Protection Needed?', International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 133.
141. Lowndes, J.J. (1840), An Historical Sketch of the Law of Copyright, London.
142. MacCormick, N. (2002), 'On the Very Idea of Intellectual Property: An Essay according to the Institutional Theory of Law', Intellectual Property Quarterly, 227.
143. Macfie, R.A. (1879), Copyright and Patents for Inventions, Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
144. Macgillivray, E.J. (1902), A Treatise Upon the Law of Copyright, London: Murray.
145. Macgillivray, E.J. (1906), A Digest of the Law of Copyright, London: Butterworth & Co.
146. Macgillivray, E.J. (1907), Copyright in Letters, London: Publishers' Association.
147. Macgillivray, E.J. (1911), Copyright Cases, 2, London: Publishers' Association.
148. Martin, S.M. (2002), 'The Mythology of the Public Domain: Exploring the Myths Behind Attacks on the Duration of Copyright Protection', Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 253.
149. Maugham, R. (1828), A Treatise on the Laws of Literary Property, London.
150. Milsom, S.F.C. (1981), Historical Foundations of the Common Law, London: Butterworths.
151. Montefiore, J. (1802), The Law of Copyright, London.
152. Morgan, J.A. (1875), The Law of Literature, vols 1 & 2, New York: Cockcroft & Co.
153. Murphy, A. (2002), 'Queen Anne and Anarchists: Can Copyright survive in the Digital Age?', Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, available at www.oiprc.ox.ac.uk/EJWP0202.html.
154. Netanel, N. (1996), 'Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society', Yale Law Journal, 283.
155. Newman, J.O. (2001), 'Academia and the Bench: Toward a more Productive Dialogue', in Dreyfuss, R., Zimmerman, D.L. and First, H. (eds), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
156. Newton, A.V. (1884), An Analysis of the Patent and Copyright Laws, London: Trübner & Co.
157. Nimmer, M.B. and Nimmer, D. (1997), Nimmer on Copyright, New York: Matthew Bender.
158. Ochoa, T.T. (2002-03), 'Origins and Meanings of the Public Domain', University of Dayton Law Review, 215.
159. Oddi, A.S. (2002-03), 'The Tragicomedy of the Public Domain in Intellectual Property Law', Hastings Comm. & Ent. Law Journal, 1.
160. Oldham, J. (1992), The Mansfield Manuscripts and the Growth of English Law in the Eighteenth Century, Chapel Hill, US and London, UK: University of North Carolina Press.
161. Parks, S. (ed.) (1974), Four Tracts on Freedom of the Press, 1790-1821, New York, US and London, UK: Garland Publishing.
162. Parks, S. (ed.) (1975), The Literary Property Debate: Six Tracts, 1764-1774, New York, US and London, UK: Garland Publishing.
163. Patterson, L.R. (1968), Copyright in Historical Perspective, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
164. Patterson L.R. and Linberg, S.W. (1991), The Nature of Copyright: A Law of User's Rights, Athens, US and London, UK: University of Georgia Press.
165. Penner, J. (1997), The Idea of Property in Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
166. Phillips, C.P. (1863), The Law of Copyright in Works of Literature and Art and in the Application of Designs, London.
167. Phillips J. and Firth, A. (2001), Introduction to Intellectual Property Law, 4th edn, London: Butterworths.
168. Pinto, T. (2002), 'The Influence of the ECHR on Intellectual Property Rights', European Intellectual Property Review, 209.
169. Plant, S.A. (1953), The New Commerce in Ideas and Intellectual Property, London: Athlone Press.
170. Pollard, M. (1989), Dublin's Trade in Books, 1550-1800, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
171. Purday, C.H. (1877), Copyright: A Sketch of its Rise and Progress, London.
172. Putnam, G.H. (1891), The Question of Copyright: A Summary of the Copyright Laws at Present in Force in the Chief Countries of the World, New York and London: Putnam.
173. Ransom, H. (1956), The First Copyright Statute, Austin: University of Texas. Report from the Select Committee on the Copyright Acts (1818), 9 Sessional Papers 402.
174. Report from the Select Committee of the House of Lords on the Copyright Bill and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill (1898), 9 Sessional Papers 393
175. Ricketson, S. (1987), Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works 1886-1987, London: Centre for Commercial Law Queen Mary College/Kluwer.
176. Rose, C.M. (2003), 'Romans, Roads, and Romantic Creators: Traditions of Public Property in the Information Age', Law & Contemp. Probs, 89.
177. Rose, M. (1993), Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright, London: Harvard University Press.
178. Rose, M. (2003), 'Nine-Tenths of the Law: The English Copyright Debates and the Rhetoric of the Public Domain', Law & Contemp. Probs, 75.
179. Roworth, C. (1798), The Art of Defence on Foot, with the Broad Sword and Sabre, Uniting the Scotch and Austrian Methods into One Regular System, London: Egerton.
180. Royal Commission on Copyright (1878), Report of the Commissioners, London: HMSO
181. Rushton, M. (2002), 'Copyright and Freedom of Expression: An Economic Analysis', in Towse, R. (ed.) (2002), Copyright in the Cultural Industries, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.
182. Ryan. M. (1998-99), 'Fair Use and Academic Expression: Rhetoric, Reality, and Restriction on Academic Freedom', Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 541.
183. Samuels, E. (1993), 'The Public Domain in Copyright Law', Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 137.
184. Samuelson, P. (2003), 'Mapping the Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities', Law & Contemp. Probs, 147.
185. Schiffman, S.M. (1996), 'Movies in the Public Domain: A Threatened Species', Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts, 663.
186. Scrutton, T.E. (1883), The Laws of Copyright, London: Murray.
187. Scrutton, T.E. (1887), Commons and Common Fields, or The History and Policy of the Laws Relating to Commons and Enclosures in England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
188. Scrutton, T.E. (1890), The Law of Copyright, London: Clowes and Sons.
189. Scrutton, T.E. (1903), The Law of Copyright, 4th edn, London: Clowes and Sons.
190. Scrutton, T.E. (1921), 'The Work of the Commercial Courts', Cambridge Law Journal, 6.
191. Seville, C. (1999), Literary Copyright Reform in Early Victorian England: The Framing of the 1842 Copyright Act, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Sherman, B. and Bently, L. (1999), The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
193. Sherman, B. and Thomas, J. (1998), 'Introduction', Journal of Law and Information Science (Special Edition), 5.
194. Shortt, J. (1871), The Law Relating to Works of Literature and Art, London: Cox.
195. Simpson, A.W.B. (1975), 'Innovation in Nineteenth-Century Contract Law', Law Quarterly Review, 247.
196. Simpson, A.W.B. (1983), 'The Legal Treatise and Legal Theory', in Ives, E.W. and Manchester, A.H. (eds), Law, Litigants and the Legal Profession, London: Royal Historical Society.
197. Singer, B. (1909), Copyright Laws of the World, Chicago: Singer.
198. Siskin, C. (1998), The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain 1700-1830, Baltimore, US and London, UK: Johns Hopkins University Press.
199. Skone James, F.E. (1927), Copinger on the Law of Copyright, 6th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
200. Skone James, F.E. (1936), Copinger on the Law of Copyright, 7th edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
201. Slater, J.H. (1884), The Law Relating to Copyright and Trade Marks, London: Stevens and Sons.
202. Smith, Marlin H. (1992-93), 'The Limits of Copyright: Property, Parody, and the Public Domain', Duke Law Journal, 1233.
203. Spalding, H.M. (1878), The Law of Copyright, Philadelphia: Ziegler & Co.
204. Stephen, J., Sir (1878), Digest of the Law of Copyright, appendix to Report of the Copyright Commissioners, 24 Sessional Papers 2036.
205. Sterk, S.E. (1995-96), 'Rhetoric and Reality in Copyright Law', Michigan Law Review, 1197.
206. Sterling, A.J. (2003), World Copyright Law, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
207. Stevens, R. (1979), Law and Politics: The House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1800-1976, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
208. Stewart, R. (1986), Henry Brougham, His Public Career 1778-1868, London: The Bodley Head.
209. Stokes, S. (2003), Art & Copyright, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Stokes, S. (2005), 'Book Review', Entertainment Law Review, 41.
210. Stokes, S. (2005), Digital Copyright, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
211. Thompson, G.C. (1883), Remarks on the Law of Literary Property in Different Countries, London: National Press Agency.
212. Torremans, P.L.C. (ed.) (2004), Copyright and Human Rights: Freedom of Expression - Intellectual Property - Privacy, The Hague, Amsterdam, London, UK and New York, US: Kluwer Law International.
213. Torremans, P. (2005), Holyoak & Torremans: Intellectual Property Law, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
214. Towse, R. and Holzhauer, R. (eds) (2002), The Economics of Intellectual Property, Vols. I-IV, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, US: Edward Elgar Publishing.
215. Treadwell, M. (2002), 'The Stationers and the Printing Acts at the End of the Seventeenth Century', in Barnard, J. and McKenzie, D.F. (eds), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV, 1557-1695, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
216. Turberville, A.S. (1913), The House of Lords in the Reign of William III, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
217. Turberville, A.S. (1927), The House of Lords in the Eighteenth Century, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
218. Turberville, A.S. (1958), The House of Lords in the Age of Reform, 1784-1837, London: Faber & Faber.
219. Turner, S. (1813), Reasons for a Modification of the Act of Anne, Respecting the Delivery of Books and Copyright, London: Nichols and Son and Bentley.
220. Uhlir, P. (2003), Draft Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Public Domain Information, Paris: UNESCO.
221. Underdown, E.M. (1863), The Law of Art Copyright, London: Crockford.
222. Underkuffler, L.S. (2003), The Idea of Property: Its Meaning and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
223. Van Caenegem, W. (2002), 'The Public Domain: Scientia Nullius?', European Intellectual Property Review, 324.
224. Vaver, D. (1995), 'Abridgements and Abstracts: Copyright Implications', European Intellectual Property Review, 225.
225. Vaver, D. (2000), 'Intellectual Property: The State of the Art', Law Quarterly Review, 621.
226. Veeder, V.V. (1968), 'The English Reports, 1537-1865', in Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, vol. II, London: Wildy & Sons.
227. Vinje, T. (2000), 'Should We Begin Digging Copyright's Grave?', European Intellectual Property Review, 551.
228. Waldron, J. (1988), The Right to Private Property, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
229. Waldron, J. (1993), 'From Author to Copiers: Individual Rights and Social Values in Intellectual Property', Chicago-Kent Law Review, 841.
230. Weinstein, L.M. (1994),'Ancient Works, Modern Dilemmas: The Dead Sea Scrolls Copyright Case', The American University Law Review, 1637.
231. Whicher, J. (1961-62), 'The Ghost of Donaldson v Beckett: An Inquiry into the Constitutional Distribution of Powers over the Law of Literary Property in the United States - Part 1', Copyright Society of the USA, 128.
232. Wiese, H. (2002), 'The Justification of the Copyright System in the Digital Age', European Intellectual Property Review, 387.
233. Williams, J. (1998), 'The Rhetoric of Property', Iowa Law Review, 277.
234. Winslow, R. (1889), The Law of Artistic Copyright, London: Clowes & Sons. WIPO, 'Intellectual Property on the Internet: ASurvey of the Issues', available at www.ecommerce.wipo.org.