Panel estimates of the wage penalty for maternal leave

Oxford Economic Papers

Volumn 61, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2009, Pages

  Buligescu, Bianca ^a   de Crombrugghe, Denis ^b   Menteşoǧlu, Gülçin ^b   Montizaan, Raymond ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; MATERNAL EFFECT; PANEL DATA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; WAGE; WOMENS STATUS; WORKING CONDITIONS;

EID: 65449126260     PISSN: 00307653     EISSN: 14643812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpn042     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Albrecht, J.W., Edin, P-A., Sundström, M., and Vroman, S.B. (1999) Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data, The Journal of Human Resources, 34, 294-311.
2. Beblo, M. and Wolf, E. (2002) Wage penalties for career interruptions: An empirical analysis for West Germany, Working Paper 02-45, ZEW, Mannheim.
3. Beblo, M., Bender, S., and Wolf, E. (2009) Establishment-level wage effects of entering motherhood, Oxford Economic Papers, 61 this issue.
4. Budig, M.J. and England, P. (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood, American Sociological Review, 66, 204-25.
5. Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data, Review of Economic Studies, XLVII, 225-38.
6. Dustmann, C. and Rochina-Barrachina, M.E. (2007) Selection correction in panel data models: An application to labour supply and wages, Econometrics Journal, 10, 263-93.
7. Dustmann, C. and Van Soest, A. (1998) Public and private sector wages of male workers in Germany, European Economic Review, 42 1417-41.
8. Heckman, J.J. (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475-92.
9. Heckman, J.J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47, 153-61.
10. Kreyenfeld, M. (2001) Employment and fertility in East Germany in the 1990s, Dissertation, Max-Planck lnstitute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
11. Kunze, A. (2002) The timing of careers and human capital depreciation, Discussion Paper no. 509, IZA, Bonn.
12. Kunze, A. and Ejrnaes, M. (2004) Wage dips and drops around first birth, Discussion Paper no. 1011, IZA, Bonn.
13. Kyriazidou, E. (1997) Estimation of a panel data sample selection model, Econometrica, 65, 1335-64.
14. Lundberg, S. and Rose, E. (2000) Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women, Labour Economics, 7, 689-710.
15. Mincer, J. and Ofek, H. (1982) Interrupted work careers: depreciation and restoration of human capital, Journal of Human Resources, 17, 3-24.
16. Mincer, J. and Polachek, S. (1974) Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women, Journal of Political Economy, 82 Part 2, s76-108.
17. Mundlak, Y. (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross-section data, Econometrica, 46, 69-85.
18. Olivetti, C. and Petrongolo, B. (2006) Unequal pay or unequal employment? A cross-country analysis of gender gaps, Discussion Paper no. 1941, IZA, Bonn.
19. Rochina-Barrachina, M.E. (1999) A new estimator for panel data sample selection models, Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 55/56, 153-81.
20. Semykina, A. and Wooldridge, J. (2006) Estimating panel data models in presence of endogeneity and selection: Theory and application, Discussion paper, Department of Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
21. Simonsen, M. and Skipper, L. (2006) The costs of motherhood: An analysis using matching estimators, Journal of Applied Econometrics 21, 919-34.
22. Spence, M. (1973) Job market signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-79.
23. Stock, J.H. and Yogo, M. (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression, ch. 5, in D.W.K. Andrews and J.H. Stock (eds) Identification and Inference in Econometric Models: Essays in Honour of Thomas J. Rothenberg, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Waldfogel, J. (1998) The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: Can maternity leave make a difference? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 505-45.
25. Wooldridge, J. (1995) Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 115-32.
26. Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.