Extinction of conditioned inhibition: Effects of different outcome continua

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 85-94

  Lotz, Anja ^a   Lachnit, Harald ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; REFERENCE VALUE;

CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; REFERENCE VALUES; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 65349187080     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: 15434508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.1.85     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AITKEN, M. R. F., LARKIN, M. J. W., & DICKINSON, A. (2000). Superlearning of causal judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 59-81.
2. BECKERS, T., MILLER, R. R., DE HOUWER, J., & URUSHIHARA, K. (2006). Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92-102. (Pubitemid 43283739)
3. CHAPMAN, G. B., & ROBBINS, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cognition, 18, 537-545. (Pubitemid 20291606)
4. COTTON, M. M., GOODALL, G., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1982). Inhibitory conditioning resulting from a reduction in the magnitude of reinforcement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 163-180.
5. DE HOUWER, J., BECKERS, T., & VANDORPE, S. (2005). Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena. Learning & Behavior, 33, 239-249. (Pubitemid 44698722)
6. KARAZINOW, D. M., & BOAKES, R. A. (2004). Learning about cues that prevent an outcome: Conditioned inhibition and differential inhibition in human predictive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 153-178. (Pubitemid 38483862)
7. KONORSKI, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. KONORSKI, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. LOBER, K., & SHANKS, D. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997). Psychological Review, 107, 195-212.
10. LOVIBOND, P. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1331-1352.
11. LOVIBOND, P. F., BEEN, S.-L., MITCHELL, C. J., BOUTON, M. E., & FROHARDT, R. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgments is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133-142. (Pubitemid 36343676)
12. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.
13. MELCHERS, K. G., LACHNIT, H., & SHANKS, D. R. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 25-53. (Pubitemid 38169973)
14. MELCHERS, K. G., WOLFF, S., & LACHNIT, H. (2006). Extinction of conditioned inhibition through nonreinforced presentation of the inhibitor. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 662-667. (Pubitemid 44884324)
15. MILLER, R. R., & MATZEL, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. MILLER, R. R., & SCHACHTMAN, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
17. MITCHELL, C. J., & LOVIBOND, P. F. (2002). Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 311-329.
18. PEARCE, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
19. PINEÑO, O., DENNISTON, J. C., BECKERS, T., MATUTE, H., & MILLER, R. R. (2005). Contrasting predictive and causal values of predictors and of causes. Learning & Behavior, 33, 184-196. (Pubitemid 44698718)
20. RESCORLA, R. A. (1979). Conditioned inhibition and extinction. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski (pp. 83-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22. STOUT, S. C., & MILLER, R. R. (2007). Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): A formalization of the comparator hypothesis. Psychological Review, 114, 759-783.
23. VANDORPE, S., DE HOUWER, J., & BECKERS, T. (2007). The role of memory for compounds in cue competition. Learning & Motivation, 38, 195-207.
24. WILLIAMS, D. A., OVERMIER, J. B., & LOLORDO, V. M. (1992). A reevaluation of Rescorla's early dictums about Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 275-290.
25. ZIMMER-HART, C. L., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1974). Extinction of Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 86, 837-845.