|
Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2009, Pages
|
Etonogestrel implant as a contraceptive choice; patient acceptability and adverse effect profile in a general practice setting
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ETONOGESTREL;
LIDOCAINE;
3 KETO DESOGESTREL;
3-KETO-DESOGESTREL;
CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;
DESOGESTREL;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
ASEPSIS;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
BLEEDING;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE;
DEVICE REMOVAL;
DRUG TOLERABILITY;
DRUG WITHDRAWAL;
FEMALE;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
IMPLANT;
IRELAND;
LOCAL ANESTHESIA;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MOOD DISORDER;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SIDE EFFECT;
TREATMENT DURATION;
WEIGHT GAIN;
ADOLESCENT;
DIRECTIVE COUNSELING;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;
STATISTICS;
UTERUS BLEEDING;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
COHORT STUDIES;
CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR;
CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE;
DESOGESTREL;
DIRECTIVE COUNSELING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
IRELAND;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
UTERINE HEMORRHAGE;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 65349182424
PISSN: 03323102
EISSN: 03323102
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (10)
|