Phylogenetic structure of the grass subfamily Pooideae based on comparison of plastid matK gene-3'trnK exon and nuclear ITS sequences

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 405-424

  Schneider, Julia ^a   Döring, Eike ^a,b   Hilu, Khidir W ^b   Röser, Martin ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aveneae; Grasses; ITS; MatK gene 3'trnK exon; Poaceae; Poeae; Pooideae; Systematics

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; CHLOROPLAST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DNA; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GRASS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

AVENEAE; MELICEAE; NARDEAE; POACEAE; POEAE; POOIDEAE; STIPEAE; TRITICEAE;

EID: 65349181111     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.582008     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Álvarez, I. & Wendel, J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 29: 417-434.
2. Arber,A. 1928.Studies on the Gramineae V. 1. On Luziola and Dactylis, 2. On Lygeum and Nardus. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 52: 291-407.
3. Bailey, CD., Carr, T.G., Harris, S.A. & Hughes, C.F. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA: polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 29: 435-455.
4. Barker, N.P., Linder, H.P. & Harley, E.H. 1999. Sequences of the grass-specific insert in the chloroplast rpoC2 gene elucidate generic relationships of the Arundinoideae (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 23: 327-350.
5. Barkworth, M.E. 2007. Stipeae Dumort. Pp. 109-111 in: Bark- worth, M.E., Capels, K.M., Long, S., Anderton, L.K. & Piep, M.B. (eds.), Flora of North America North of Mexico, vol. 24. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
6. Barkworth, M.E. & Everett, J. 1987. Evolution in the Stipeae: identification and relationship of its monophyletic taxa. Pp. 251-264 in: Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell, C.S. & Barkworth, M.E. (eds.), Grass Systematics and Evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Baum, B.R. & Appels, R. 1992. Evolutionary change at the 5S DNA loci of species in the Triticeae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 183: 195-208.
8. Bayly, M.J. & Ladiges, P.Y. 2007. Divergent paralogues of ribosomal DNA in eucalypts (Myrtaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 44: 346-356.
9. Blattner, F.R. 1999. Direct amplification of the entire ITS region from poorly preserved plant material using recombinant PCR. BioTechniques 27: 1180-1186.
10. Blattner, F.R. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of Hordeum (Poaceae) as inferred by nuclear rDNA ITS sequences. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 33: 289-299.
11. Blattner, F.R., Weising, K., Baenfer, G., Maschwitz, U. & Fiala, B. 2001. Molecular analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphor- biaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 19: 331-344.
12. Bouchenak-Khelladi, Y., Salamin, N., Savolainen, V., Forest, V., Van der Bank, M., Chase, M.W. & Hodkinson, T.R. 2008. Large multi-gene phylogenetic trees of the grasses (Poaceae): progress towards complete tribal and generic level sampling. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 47: 488-505.
13. Brysting, A.K., Fay, M.F., Leitch, I.J. & Aiken S.G. 2004. One or more species in the artic grass genus Dupontial- A contribution to the Panarctic Flora project. Taxon 53: 365-382.
14. Cameron, K.M., Wurdack, K.J. & Jobson, R.W. 2002. Molecular evidence for the common origin of snap-traps among carnivorous plants. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1503-1509.
15. Catalán, P., Kellogg, E.A. & Olmstead, R.G. 1997. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 8: 150-166.
16. Catalán, P. & Olmstead, R.G. 2000. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Brachypodium P. Beauv. (Poaceae) from combined sequences of chloroplast ndhF gene and nuclear ITS. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 1-19.
17. Catalán, P., Shi, Y., Armstrong, L., Draper, J. & Stace, C.A. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of the grass genus Brachypodium P. Beauv. based on RFLP and RAPD analysis. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 117: 263-280.
18. Catalán, P., Torrecilla, P., Rodríguez, J.A.L. & Olmstead, R.G. 2004. Phylogeny of festucoid grasses of subtribe Lo- liinae and allies (Poeae, Pooideae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 31: 517-541.
19. Chen, S.L. & Phillips, S.M. 2006. 96. Littledalea Hemsley. Pp. 370-371 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. & Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 22. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
20. Chiapella, J. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic study of Deschampsia (Poaceae: Aveneae) inferred from nuclear ITS and plastid trnL sequence data: support for the recognition of Avenella and Vahlodea. Taxon 56: 55-64.
21. Choo, M.K., Soreng, R.J. & Davis, J.I. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among Puccinellia and allied genera of Poaceae as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 119-126.
22. Clark, L.G., Zhang, W. & Wendel, J.F. 1995. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 20: 436-460.
23. Clayton, W.D. & Renvoize, S.A. 1986. Genera Graminum: Grasses of the World. Kew Bulletin, Additional Series 13. HMSO, London
24. Clifford, H.T. & Watson, L. 1977. Identifying Grasses: Data, Methods and Identification. University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia.
25. Cummings, M.P., King, L.M. & Kellogg, E.A. 1994. Slipped- strand mispairing in a plastid gene: rpoC2 in grasses (Poaceae). Molec. Biol. Evol. 11: 1-8.
26. Cunningham, C.W. 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molec. Biol. Evol. 14: 733-740.
27. Cunningham, C.W. 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46: 464-478.
28. Davis, J.I. & Soreng, R.J. 1993. Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1444-1454.
29. Decker, H.F. 1964a. An anatomic-systematic study of the classical tribe Festuceae (Gramineae). Amer. J. Bot. 51: 453-463.
30. Decker, H.F. 1964b. Affinities of trie grass genus Ampelodesmos. Brittonia 16: 76-79.
31. Dolphin, K., Belshaw, R., Orme, C.D.L. & Quicke, D.L.J. 2000. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 17: 401-406.
32. Döring, E., Schneider, J., Hilu, K.W. & Röser, M. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in the Aveneae/Poeae complex (Pooideae, Poaceae). Kew Bull. 62: 407-424.
33. Duvall, M.R. & Morton, B.R. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics of Poaceae: an expanded analysis of rbcL sequence data. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 5: 352-358.
34. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
35. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
36. Fernández Souto, D.P., Catalano, S.A., Tosto, D., Berna- sconi, P., Sala, A., Wagner, M. & Corach, D. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of Deschampsia antarctica (Poaceae): insights from nuclear ribosomal ITS. Pl. Syst. Evol. 261: 1-9.
37. Gillespie, L.J. & Soreng, R.J. 2005. A phylogenetic analysis of the bluegrass genus Poa based on cpDNA restriction site data. Syst. Bot. 30: 84-105.
38. GPWG (The Grass Phylogeny Working Group). 2001. Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 88: 373-457.
39. Grebenstein, B., Roser, M., Sauer, W. & Hemleben, V. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic relationships in Aveneae (Poaceae) species and other grasses as inferred from ITS1 and ITS2 rDNA sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 213: 233-250.
40. Hall, J.C., Sytsma, K.J. & litis, H.H. 2002. Phylogeny of Cap- paraceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1826-1842.
41. Hilu, K.W. 1985. Trends of variation and systematics of Poaceae. Taxon 34: 102-114.
42. Hilu, K.W., Alice, L.A. & Liang, H. 1999. Phylogeny of the Poaceae inferred from matK sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 86: 835-851.
43. Hilu, K.W. & Wright, K. 1982. Systematics of Poaceae: a cluster analysis study. Taxon 31: 9-36.
44. Hipp, A.L., Hall, J.C. & Sytsma, K.J. 2004. Phylogenetic accuracy, congruence between data partitions, and performance of the ILD. Syst. Biol. 53: 81-89.
45. Hsiao, C, Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H. & Jensen, K.B. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of 10 grass species: an assessment of phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer region in nuclear ribosomal DNA in monocots. Genome 37: 112-120.
46. Hsiao, C., Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H. & Jensen, K.B. 1995a. Molecular phylogeny of Pooideae (Poaceae) based on nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 389-398.
47. Hsiao, C, Chatterton, N.J., Asay, K.H. & Jensen, K.B. 1995b. Phylogenetic relationship of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome 38: 211-223.
48. Hsiao, C, Jacobs, S.W.L., Chatterton, N.J. & Asay, K.H. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on the sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS). Austral. Syst. Bot. 11: 667-688.
49. Hunter, A.M., Orlovich, D.A., Lloyd, K.M., Lee, W.G. & Murphy, D.J. 2004. The generic position of Austrofestuca littoralis and the reinstatement of Hookerochloa and Festucella (Poaceae) based on evidence from nuclear (ITS) and chloroplast (JrnL-trnF) DNA sequences. New Zealand J. Bot. 42: 253-262.
50. Johnson, L.A. & Soltis, D.E. 1994. matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s.str. Syst. Bot. 19: 143-156.
51. Johnson, L.A. & Soltis, D.E. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 149-175.
52. Kellogg, E.A. & Appels, R. 1995. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics 140: 325-343.
53. Kellogg, E.A. & Campbell, C.S. 1987. Phylogenetic analyses of the Gramineae. Pp. 310-322 in: Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell, C.S. & Barkworth, M.E. (eds.), Grass Systematics and Evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
54. Kellogg, E.A. & Linder, H.P. 1995. Phylogeny of the Poales. Pp. 379-414 in: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F. & Humphries, C.J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
55. Kellogg, E.A. & Watson, L. 1993. Phylogenetic study of a large dataset. I. Bambusoideae, Andropogonodae, and Pooideae (Gramineae). Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 59: 273-343.
56. Liu, F.R. & Miyamoto, M.M. 1999. Phylogenetic assessment of molecular and morphological data for Eutherian mammals. Syst. Biol. 48: 54-64.
57. Liu, L., Chen, S.L., Zu, G.H., Ammann, K.H. & Phillips, S.M. 2006.14. Tribe Bromeae. P. 370 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 22. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
58. Macfarlane, T.D. 1987. Poaceae subfamily Pooideae. Pp. 265- 276 in: Soderstrom, T.R., Hilu, K.W., Campbell, C.S. & Barkworth, M.E. (eds.), Grass Systematics and Evolution. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
59. Macfarlane, T.D. & Watson, L. 1980. The circumscription of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae, with notes on some controversial genera. Taxon 29: 645-666.
60. Macfarlane, T.D. & Watson, L. 1982. The classification of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae. Taxon 31: 178-203.
61. Mason-Gamer, R.J. 2001. Origin of North American species of Elymus (Poaceae: Triticeae) allotetraploids based on granule-bound starch synthase gene sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 757-768.
62. Mason-Gamer, R.J. 2005. The β-amylase genes of grasses and a phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1045-1058.
63. Mason-Gamer, R.J. & Kellogg, E.A. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae using the starch synthase gene, and a preliminary analysis of some North American Elymus species. Pp. 102-109 in: Jacobs, S.W.L. & Everett, J. (eds.), Grasses: Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
64. Mason-Gamer, R.J., Weil, C.F. & Kellogg, E.A. 1998. Granule-bound starch synthase: structure, function and phylogenetic utility. Molec. Biol. Evol. 15: 1658-1673.
65. Mathews, S., Tsai, R.C. & Kellogg, E.A. 2000. Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae): evidence from the nuclear gene phytochrome B. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 96-107.
66. Mejia-Saules, T. & Bisby, F.A. 2000. Preliminary views on the tribe Meliceae (Gramineae: Pooideae). Pp. 83-88 in: Jacobs, S.W.L. & Everett, J. (eds.), Grasses: Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
67. Nadot, S., Bajon, R. & Lejeune, B. 1994. The chloroplast gene rps4 as tool for the study of Poaceae phylogeny. Pl. Syst. Evol. 191: 27-38.
68. Nieto Feliner, G. & Rosselló, J.A. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 44: 911-919.
69. Pilger, R. 1954. Das System der Gramineae unter Ausschluβ der Bambusoideae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 76: 281-284.
70. Posada D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
71. Quintanar, A., Castroviejo, S. & Catalán, P. 2007. Phylogeny of the tribe Aveneae (Pooideae, Poaceae) inferred from plastid trnT-F and nuclear ITS sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1554-1569.
72. Quintanar, A., Catalan, P. & Castroviejo, S. 2006. Adscription ofParafestuca albida (Lowe) E.B. Alexeev to Koeleria Pers. Taxon 55: 664-670.
73. Razafimandimbison, S.G., Kellogg, E.A. & Bremer, B. 2004. Recent origin and phylogenetic utility of divergent ITS putative pseudogenes: a case study from the Naucleeae (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 53: 177-192.
74. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
75. Röser, M., Winterfeld, G., Grebenstein, B. & Hemleben, V. 2001. Molecular diversity and physical mapping of 5S rDNA in wild and cultivated oat grasses (Poaceae: Aveneae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 21: 198-217.
76. Seelanan, T., Schnabel, A. & Wendel, J.F. 1997. Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Syst. Bot. 22: 259-290.
77. Simmons, M.P. & Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369-381.
78. Smith, P. 1970. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the bromegrasses (Bromus L. s.l.). Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 30: 361-375.
79. Soreng, R.J. & Davis, J.I. 1998. Phylogenetics and character evolution in the grass family (Poaceae): simultaneous analysis of morphological and chloroplast DNA restriction site character sets. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 64: 1-85.
80. Soreng, R.J. & Davis, J.I. 2000. Phylogenetic structure in Poaceae subfamily Pooideae as inferred from molecular and morphological characters: misclassification versus reticulation. Pp. 61-74 in: Jacobs, S.W.L. & Everett, J. (eds.), Grasses: Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne.
81. Soreng, R.J., Davis, J.I. & Doyle, J.J. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in Poaceae subfam. Pooideae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 172: 83-97.
82. Soreng, R.J., Davis, J.I. & Voionmaa, M.A. 2007. A phylogenetic analysis of Poaceae tribe Poeae sensu lato based on morphological characters and sequence data from three plastid-encoded genes: evidence for reticulation, and a new classification of the tribe. Kew Bull. 62: 425-454.
83. Soreng, R. J., Peterson, P.M., Davidse, G., Judziewicz, E. J., Zuloaga, F.O., Filguelras, T.S. & Morrone, O. 2003. Catalogue of New World grasses (Poaceae): IV. subfamily Pooideae. Contr. U.S. Natl. Herb. 48: 1-730.
84. Stebbins, G.L. 1956. Cytogenetics and evolution of the grass family. Amer. J. Bot. 43: 890-905.
85. Stebbins, G.L. 1972. The evolution of the grass family. Pp. 1-17 in: Younger, V.B. & McKell, CM. (eds.), The Biology and Utilization of Grasses. Academic Press, New York.
86. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*; Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), vers. 4.0bl0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
87. Tateoka, T. 1957. Notes on some grasses. III. 5. Affinities of the genus Brylkinia. 6. Systematic position of the genus Diarrhena. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 70: 8-12.
88. Torrecilla, P. & Catalan, P. 2002. Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineages (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 27: 241-251.
89. Tzvelev, N.N. 1976. Grasses of the Soviet Union, vols. I and II. Nauka, Leningrad; English translation 1983. Oxonion Press, New Delhi.
90. Tzvelev, N.N. 1989. The system of grasses (Poaceae) and their evolution. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 55: 141-203.
91. Tzvelev, N.N. 2005. O proishozhdenii i evolyutzii kovyley (Stipa L.). Pp. 332-349 in: Geltman, D.V. (ed.), Problemy teoreticheskiy morfologii i evolyutzii vysshikh rasteniy. Tovarischestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, Moskwa & St. Peterburg.
92. Walker, J.B. & Sytsma, K.J. 2007. Staminal evolution in the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae): molecular phylogenetic evidence for multiple origins of the staminal lever. Ann. Bot. (Oxford) 100: 375-391.
93. Watson, L. & Dallwitz, M.J. 1992. The Grass Genera of the World, revised ed. CAB International, Wallingford.
94. Watson, L. & Dallwitz, M.J. 1992 onwards. The Grass Genera of the World: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval; Including Synonyms, Morphology, Anatomy, Physiology, Phytochemislry, Cytology, Classification, Pathogens, World and Local Distribution, and References, version: 23rd October 2005. Online source 〈http://delta- intkey.com〉
95. Whitten, W.M., Williams, N.H. & Chase, M.W. 2000. Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Or- chidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1842-1856.
96. Wu, Z.L. & Phillips, S.M. 2006.7. Tribe Stipeae. Pp. 188-212 in: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H. & Hong, D.Y. (eds.), Flora of China, vol. 22. Science Press, Beijing; Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
97. Yoder, A.D., Irwin, J.A. & Payseur, B.A. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50: 408-424.