Developmental comparison of leaf shape variation in three Chamaedorea species

Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 210-221

  Nowak, Julia ^a,b   Nowak, Adam ^a   Posluszny, Usher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abscission like process; Bifid leaf; Chamaedorea fragrans; Chamaedorea seifrizii; Chamaedorea stolonifera; Leaf development

Indexed keywords

ABSCISSION; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; JUVENILE; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MONOCOTYLEDON;

CHAMAEDOREA; CHAMAEDOREA FRAGRANS; CHAMAEDOREA SEIFRIZII; CHAMAEDOREA STOLONIFERA;

EID: 65349177737     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-131     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bernal, R.G., Galeano, G., and Hodel, D.R. 2004. A new species of Chamaedorea from Colombia. Palms, 48: 27-29.
2. Deinega, V. 1898. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Blattes und der Anlage der Gefässbündel. Flora (Jena), 85: 439-498.
3. Eichler, A.W. 1885. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Palmenblätter. Abh Konigl Akad Wiss Berlin, 1: 1-28.
4. Grayum, M.H. 1998. Nomenclature and new species of Costa Rican Palms. Phytologia, 84: 307-327.
5. Gunawardena, A.H.L.A.N., and Dengler, N.G. 2006. Alternative modes of leaf dissection in monocotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 150: 25-44. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00487.x.
6. Henderson, F.M. 2006. Morphology and anatomy of palm seedlings. Bot. Rev. 72(4): 273-329. doi:10.1663/0006-8101(2006) 72[273:MAAOPS]2.0.CO;2.
7. Hodel, D.R. 1992a. Chamaedorea palms: the species and their cultivation. International Palm Society and Allen Press, Lawrence, Kans.
8. Hodel, D.R. 1992b. Additions to Chamaedorea palms: new species from Mexico and Guatemala and miscellaneous notes. Principes, 36(4): 188-202.
9. Hodel, D.R. 1995. Three new species of Chamaedorea from Panama. Principes, 39(1): 14-20.
10. Hodel, D.R. 1996. Two new species of Chamaedorea from Costa Rica. Principes, 40: 212-216.
11. Hodel, D.R. 1997. Two new species of Chamaedorea (Arecaceae). Novon, 7(1): 35-37. doi:10.2307/3392071.
12. Hodel, D.R., Castillo Mont, J.J., and Zuniga, R. 1995. Two new species of Chamaedorea from Honduras. Principes, 39(4): 183-189.
13. Hodel, D.R., Herrera, G., and Cascante, A. 1997. A remarkable new species and additional novelties of Chamaedorea from Costa Rica and Panama. Palms. 139: 32-44.
14. Kaplan, D.R. 1997. Principles of plant morphology. Vol 3. Odin Readers, Berkeley, Calif.
15. Kaplan, D.R., Dengler, N.G., and Dengler, R.E. 1982. The mechanism of plication inception in palm leaves: problem and developmental morphology. Can. J. Bot. 60: 2939-2975. doi:10.1139/ b82-355.
16. Naumann, A. 1887. Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Palmenblätter. Flora (Jena), 70: 193-257.
17. Nowak, J., Dengler, N.G., and Posluszny, U. 2007. The role of abscission during leaflet separation in Chamaedorea elegans (Arecaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168(5): 533-545. doi:10.1086/513489.
18. Nowak, J., Dengler, N.G., and Posluszny, U. 2008. Abscission-like leaflet separation in Chamaedorea seifrizii (Arecaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169(6): 723-734. doi:10.1086/588067.
19. Ruzin, S.E. 1999. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
20. Thomas, M.M., Garwood, N.C., Baker, W.J., Henderson, S.A., Russell, S.J., Hodel, D.R., and Bateman, R.M. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the palm genus Chamaedorea, based on the lowcopy nuclear genes PRK and RPB2. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38: 398-415. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.019. PMID:16249101.
21. Tomlinson, P.B. 1960. Seedling leaves in palms and their morphological significance. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 41: 414-428.
22. Tomlinson, P.B. 1990. The structural biology of palms. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.