Modeling Oral Reading Fluency Development in Latino Students: A Longitudinal Study Across Second and Third Grade

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 315-329

  Al Otaiba, Stephanie ^a   Petscher, Yaacov ^a   Pappamihiel, N Eleni ^b   Williams, Rihana S ^c   Dyrlund, Allison K ^a   Connor, Carol ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

English language learners; progress monitoring; reading development; reading fluency; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 65349159207     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014698     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Al Otaiba S., Kosanovich-Grek M.L., Torgesen J.K., Hassler L., and Wahl M. Reviewing core kindergarten and first grade reading programs in light of No Child Left Behind: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing Quarterly 21 (2005) 377-400
2. Al Otaiba S., and Torgesen J. Effects from intensive standardized kindergarten and first grade interventions for the prevention of reading difficulties. In: Jimerson S.R., Burns M.K., and Van der Heyden A.M. (Eds). The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (2007), Springer, New York 212-222
3. Artiles A.J., Klingner J.K., and Tate W.F. Representation of minority students in special education: Complicating traditional explanations. Educational Research 35 (2006) 3-5
4. Artiles A., and Trent S. Disproportionality in special and gifted programs. In: Reynolds C.R., and Fletcher-Jantzen E. (Eds). Encyclopedia of special education (2000), Wiley, New York
5. August D., and Hakuta K. Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda (1998), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
6. August D., and Shanahan T. Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
7. Barger J. Comparing the DIBELS oral reading fluency indicator and the North Carolina end of grade reading assessment (2003), North Carolina Teacher Academy, Asheville, NC
8. Buck J., and Torgesen J. The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCRR Tech. Rep. No. 1) (2003), Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, FL
9. Chou C.-P., Yang D., Pentz M.A., and Hser Y. Piecewise growth curve modeling approach for longitudinal prevention study. Computation Statistics and Data Analysis 46 2 (2004) 213-225
10. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
11. Crowe, E. C., Connor, C. M., & Petscher, Y. (in press). Examining the core: Relations among reading curricula, socioeconomic status, and first through third grade oral reading fluency. Journal of School Psychology
12. Deno S.L. Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children 52 3 (1985) 219-232
13. Deno S.L., Fuchs L.S., Marston D.B., and Shin J. Using curriculum-based measurement to develop growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review 30 (2001) 507-524
14. Donovan M.S., and Cross C.T. Minority students in special and gifted education (2002), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
15. Dunn L.M., and Dunn L.M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 3rd ed. (1997), American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN
16. Francis D., Rivera M., Lesaux N., Kieffer M., and Rivera H. Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: Research-based recommendations for instruction and academic interventions (2006), Center on Instruction, English Language Learners Strand, Houston, TX
17. Francis D.J., Shaywitz S.E., Stuebing K.K., Shaywitz B.A., and Fletcher J.M. Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 1 (1996) 3-17
18. Fuchs D., and Fuchs L.S. Respecting the importance of science and practice: A pragmatic view. Learning Disability Quarterly 21 4 (1998) 281-287
19. Fuchs L.S., and Fuchs D. Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review 21 1 (1992) 45-58
20. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Hosp M.K., and Jenkins J.R. Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 3 (2001) 239-256
21. Garcia S.B., and Ortiz A.A. Preventing inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education (NCBE New Focus No. 5) (1988), National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, Silver Spring, MD (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED309591)
22. Good R.H., and Kaminski R.A. Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. 6th ed. (2002), Institute for Development of Educational Achievement, Eugene, OR
23. Good R.H., and Shinn M.R. Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment 12 2 (1990) 179-193
24. Good III R.H., Simmons D.C., and Kame'enui E.J. The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading 5 3 (2001) 257-288
25. Hasbrouck J., and Tindal G.A. Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher 59 7 (2006) 636-644
26. Hedges L.V. Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs (Issue Brief No. WP-06-13) (2006), Northwestern University, Institute of Policy Research, Evanston, IL
27. Hox J. Applied multilevel analysis (1995), TT-Publikaties, Amsterdam
28. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487 (1997).
29. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
30. Jenkins J.R., Dale P.S., Mills P.E., Cole K.N., Pious C., and Ronk J. How special education preschool graduates finish: Status at 19 years of age. American Educational Research Journal 43 4 (2006) 737-782
31. Kaminski R.A., and Good R.H. Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review 25 (1996) 215-227
32. Kim, Y., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Foorman, B. (2008, January). Growth trajectories of reading sub-skills and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Reading, Asheville, NC.
33. Klingner J., and Artiles A.J. English language learners struggling to learn to read: Emergent scholarship on linguistic differences and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 39 5 (2006) 386-389
34. Lee V.E., and Loeb S. School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers' attitudes and students' achievement. American Educational Research Journal 37 1 (2000) 3-31
35. Marston D., and Deno S.L. The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Research Rep. No. 50) (1981), University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, Minneapolis
36. Marston M. Bag the "Magic E.". The Reading Teacher 42 (1989) 339
37. Mathes P.G., Denton C.A., Fletcher J.M., Anthony J.L., Francis D.J., and Schatschneider C. The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly 40 (2005) 148-182
38. McCardle P., Mele-McCarthy J., Cutting L., Leos K., and D'Emilio T. Learning disabilities in English language learners: Identifying the issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 20 1 (2005) 1-5
39. National Center for Education Statistics. Language minority learners and their labor market indicators-Recent trends (2004), U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
40. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-Early Child Care Research Network. Does amount of time spent in child care predict socioemotional adjustment during the transition to kindergarten?. Child Development 74 4 (2003) 969-1005
41. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769) (2000), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Washington DC
42. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
43. Ortiz A.A. Learning disabilities occurring concomitantly with linguistic differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities 30 3 (1997) 321-332
44. Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., & Kim, Y. (2008, January). A comparison of oral reading fluency trajectories using equated and non-equated data from DIBELS oral reading fluency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Reading, Asheville, NC.
45. Puranik C., Petscher Y., Al Otaiba S., Catts H., and Lonigan C. Development of oral reading fluency in children with speech or language impairments: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities 41 6 (2008) 545-560
46. Raudenbush S.W., and Bryk A.S. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. (2002), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
47. Roberts, J. K., & Monaco, J. P. (2006, April). Effect size measures for the two-level linear multilevel model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
48. Rosenthal R., and Rosnow R.L. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (1984), McGraw-Hill, New York
49. Sanchez K.S., Bledsoe L.M., Sumabat C., and Ye R. Hispanic students' reading situations and problems. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 3 1 (2004) 50-63
50. Shaw R., and Shaw D. DIBELS oral reading fluency-based indicators of third grade reading skills for Colorado State Assessment Program (CSAP) (2002), University of Oregon, Eugene
51. Shepherd L.A. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29 7 (2000) 4-14
52. Shinn M., Tindal G., Spira D., and Marston D. Practice of learning disabilities as social policy. Learning Disability Quarterly 10 (1987) 17-28
53. Snow C.E., Burns M.S., and Griffin P. Preventing reading difficulties in young children (1998), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
54. Speece D.L., and Case L.P. Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 735-749
55. U.S. Census Bureau. Summary tables on language use and English ability: 2000 (PHC-T-20) (2003). http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t20.html Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t20.html
56. U.S. Department of Education. Key indicators of Hispanic student achievement: National goals and benchmarks for the next decade (2003). http://www.ed.gov/pubs/hispanicindicators/index.html Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/hispanicindicators/index.html
57. Vander Meer C.D., Lentz F.E., and Stollar S. The relationship between oral reading fluency and Ohio proficiency testing in reading (2005), University of Oregon, Eugene
58. Vaughn S., Linan-Thompson S., and Hickman P. Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children 69 (2003) 391-409
59. Vellutino F.R., Scanlon D.M., Sipay E.R., Small S., Chen R., Pratt A., and Denckla M.B. Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1996) 601-638
60. Vellutino F.R., Scanlon D.M., Small S., and Fanuele D.P. Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities 39 2 (2006) 157-169
61. Wagner R.K., Francis D.J., and Morris R.D. Identifying English language learners with learning disabilities: Key challenges and possible approaches. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 20 1 (2005) 6-15
62. Wilson J. The relationship of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Oral Reading Fluency to performance on Arizona Instrument to Measures Standards (AIMS) (2005), Tempe School District No. 3, Tempe, AZ